How To Write A Persuasive Letter To Native Americans

There are hundreds of Native American tribes and millions of people that are within North America that identify themselves as Native Americans. Each tribe has their own unique customs, language, and myths. However, within the confines of this paper I will take a broad view with regards to Native American customs and traditions from a small sample of tribes that were observed prior to the vast expansion of colonizing the west.

From as early as the time of the early European settlers, Native Americans have suffered tremendously. Native Americans during the time of the early settlers where treated very badly. Europeans did what they wanted with the Native Americans, and when a group of Native Americans would stand up for themselves, the European would quickly put them down. The Native Americans bow and arrows where no match for the Europeans guns and cannon balls. When the Europeans guns didn’t work for the Europeans, the disease they bought killed the Native Americans even more effectively.

Had refusing the treaty that America tried to force on them hurt the Plateau Indians severely? Did retaliation cause them to almost come to complete annihilation? My position is that yes, the Plateau Indians made a bad decision when they refused the treaty by the United States, and that more of the Indians would have survived if they’d just moved on to the reservation like they were asked. None of the Yakima Wars would have happened if the Indians would’ve just extinguished their pride, and went peacefully onto a reservation where their people did not have to worry about fighting the whites. The main cause of this conflict was the desire of the United States citizens to move west. If they hadn’t believed in Manifest Destiny, and had the

We took their land, gave them almost nothing, grouped them amongst their own kind, tried to civilize them, and tried to change their culture to benefit the white people. The Shawnee tribe and mostly the Cherokee Indians fought again this for their freedom and to retain their lands against the white settlers. Whites need it to grow cotton, tobacco and staple crops and use slaves as the work force. The Indians did not speak the English language, or hold a Christian based religion, so they could not be of the same race, so it lead to the thought that if they could be converted from hunters into farmers, it would be to the benefit of the white settlers of the western lands that belonged to the Native Americans. Convert them to the colonist living style and make them white-brown men and they would not need the lands and the white people could prosper even

In fact the modern-day group The United Nations is saying, that the US should release some of the stolen land back to Native Americans. The reason for the referral to the land as stolen, is due to the fact that even though Native Americans hardly ever attacked the American wagons moving west, the government decided to continue to restrict Native territories eventually leading to future

With the settlement of the American West, I discern that it was not nice to force Native Americans off their land onto reservations. There was a treaty given to the Sioux for the rights to the Black Hills until gold was discovered in the area. The white miners flocked to the territory to get the gold. I don’t think it was right that with the treaty the U.S. government still ordered the Native Americans back to their reservations. With the conflict that occurred between the U.S. Government and the Native American Indian in Battle of the Little Bighorn, also called Custer’s Last Stand, marked a significant victory for the Native Americans and unfavorable for U.S. Army’s defeat. The Native Americans would have to remain in government-controlled reservations.

Native Americans are entitled to the same Constitutional protections that guard other citizens from federal government infringement. Plenary power and the accompanying seizure and use of indigenous land bases have violated the rights of Native Americans and demonstrated the inability of the federal government to manage Indian affairs. The United States should give ownership and control of original, non-privately owned land bases back to tribes. This course of action would end treaty violation, compensate tribes for land takings, prevent bureaucrats from implementing policies that obstruct the ability of Native Americans to participate in their

In 1832, the Indians signed a treaty which stated that the federal government would provide them with suitable western land and would protect them until they moved. But, with the onslaught of white settlers, the War Department backed down on it’s promise (pbs.org). Also in 1833, a small faction of the Cherokee were tricked to sign an illegal removal treaty, also known as the “Treaty of New Echota.” Led by Chief John Ross, over 15,000 Cherokees signed a petition in protest of this new treaty, but the Supreme court ignores their demands and instead ratified the treaty in 1836 (pbs.org). In all, the Indians shouldn’t have been forced to move since the Americans had cheated them in treaties and trades many times

The Indian Removal Act took place in 1830 by order of president Andrew Jackson to relocate Native indians to the west. In his speech called “On Indian Removal”, he explains how Indian Removal is beneficial to both the Indians and White Americans. Another writing about Indian removal is a personal story about a young boy being relocated with his clan and traveling on what is known as the Trail Of Tears. Though these two readings discuss the same topic, they use very different language to get their point across and to describe their view on Indian removal. Between the two pieces of writing, there are differences in the description of the situation, sentence structure, and tone. The differences in language between Jackson's "On Indian Removal" and Rutledge's "Samuel's Memory" show that Indian removal was viewed differently by different groups of people, and affected them in various ways.

The land was the Cherokee's, to begin with before the whites came to America. The United States had no right to force the Cherokee to move. In the Cherokee letter, they stated about the land that, "It is our father's gift. It is the land of our origin and the land of our intellectual birth." When the whites came to America the land already belonged to the Cherokee. Their fathers had given it to them as children and they took care of it. The Cherokee fathers had died on their land. The Cherokee should not have to move to the west away from their homeland. The land was theirs, to begin with. Therefore, the United States should not have taken away their land.

The American Indians who lived on that land were removed after the deal was made. They didn’t even know of the purchase and being removed from the land where they lived hundreds of years is just wrong. Jefferson also didn’t have the right to buy the land. According to Document 10, it states that “Let’s ignore the fact that an Executive cannot purchase land.” This shows that even though the Executive isn’t allowed to purchase land, Jefferson did it anyway and citizens were against it. The Louisiana Territory wasn’t allowed to be

approached evacuating the locals wasn't right. I trust that as President, Andrew Jackson needed to do what U.S. subjects and government authorities needed with the goal that he could remain in power. I feel that the Indians had a feeling this was seeking a while as far back as the principal pilgrims came to North America. I really feel that Americans cut the locals in the back. The locals helped the settlements survive, they battled in the upheaval. They were partners with America, and America completely pivoted and mishandled them. Simply contemplating a higher power kicking myself and my family out of my home and into outside region is alarming. I give the locals kudos for holding fast and not having any desire to leave but rather, at one point they needed to leave unless they needed war to break out. I believe that the Assembled States approached showing them out the wrong way. I mean the Indians are doing the U.S. some help, the minimum they could do will be do it calmly and separately. Simply thoroughly consider 46,000 Indians passed on out, those passings are blamed on the U.S. government for making them take off. That is my supposition on the subject and I firmly put stock in

The United States government should give the Native American back their land.The natives were not bothering the people so why should they take their land. The government should give back their land because their ancestors grew the land for the Natives. The natives having their own land they were able to live how they wanted and the way they were taught from their ancestors. My reason they should get back their land is because of their ancestors, the natives were their first and they deserve their land.

Their problem was in not recognizing the indigenous peoples’ prior claims to the land. Instead, they invaded Native space and set themselves up as the dominant group.

The Sioux war was fought over gold that the U.S. government found in the mountains occupied by the Sioux Indians, and it ended with the Indians being forced to live on reservations. In 1861, settlers wanted land that Indians occupied, so that led them to move them to the Sand Creek reservation. The local whites in the area ended up massacring 400 Indians that were under protective custody. Apparently even the Indians that were supposed to be protected by treaties were not safe from the wrath of the U.S. government. The Song “One Tin Soldier” by Coven describes the discovery of gold in the Black Hills and shows just how far the United States would go to gain wealth at the expense of the Indians. The Natives wanted to live in peace, but the whites wanted the treasure that was buried there. “Now the valley cried in anger, mount your horses, draw your sword. And they killed the mountain people, so they won their just reward.” This describes the situation that was faced when the whites found a valuable resource on Indian territory. The whites usually bought out the Indians and when they couldn’t they killed them and got what they wanted. Among the most famous of the men who massacred Indians for the benefit of the whites was General Custer. He had no problem with massacring women and children to help the government gain money. However, the whites were not always successful in pushing the Indians around. In the Battle of Little Bighorn, General