Throughout history trade has been a huge help with the creation of societies. Artifacts have been traded between a large quantity of societies and people, such as the vikings. Trade has been conducted in number of different ways as well. Trade also has a huge effect on how societies today culturally diffuse through the use of trade. In many societies, such as Ghana, Songhai and Mali, trade has played a huge importance in their development. There are also many people that have encourages cultural diffusion throughout the world. Tade can also have an effect on stock markets throughout the world which could change the way trade occurs in the future.
Since the beginning of human history, the use of trade has had a great deal of effect on the societies cultural habits. Many methods have been used to trade between societies. One of the methods societies traded with was by boat. The Vikings were a group of people that traded and fought throughout most of Eastern Europe. The Oseberg Viking ship was a primary example that trade was used by ship long ago. Many of the things they traded may include clothing, tools and pottery.
Even though the Vikings traded mainly through Eastern Europe, trade has occurred in many other places throughout the world. One of these places includes Africa. Many kingdoms such as Ghana, have traded throughout Africa for many decades, along with other societies such as the Mali empire and Songhai empire. These kingdoms have traded with each other throughout
Ermentarius, a Frankish writer comments that “Everywhere [Christians] are the victims of massacre, burning and plunder. The Vikings overrun all that lies before them…” (Source 2, Viking raids in France.) The Vikings were known for their barbaric reputation however they were also sophisticated and technologically advanced. The Viking reputation is one of bloodthirsty seafaring warriors, repeatedly plundering the Christian monasteries throughout the Middle Ages. Nevertheless examples of advanced Viking civilization was their seafaring skills and their complex social hierarchy. ) Thesis statement. This essay will discuss the Viking trading methods and their social hierarchy.
“No nation was ever ruined by trade.” This quote was said by Benjamin Franklin in the late 1700s. These words are so simple, and it seems like anyone could have said them. However, this quote has a bigger meaning in that throughout world history, trade has been so important to so many countries and it has led to many empires successes. It has occurred for a very long time, and it has progressed dramatically. Trade has changed a lot, but some parts of trade stayed the same over a long periods of time. In the era between 300 CE and 1450 CE, trade between Eurasia and Africa changed because the empires and kingdoms in power were replaced and their control over trade differed;
Throughout time every society has had to address enduring themes with different results. One of these enduring themes is cultural diffusion and trade. This is particularly apparent during the 1500s When Europeans arrived in the new world. It is also apparent when slaves were brought to the New World during the Atlantic Slave Trade. Although cultural diffusion was negative in that it caused the death of many Native Americans overall cultural diffusion was positive in that it increased communication between the New World and the Old World and it brought new crops and raw materials to the Old World.
In the empire Ghana, they worked with iron, and traded it for gold and salt. Because of trading iron for salt and gold, the empire prospered. The empire of Mali prospered from trade and that was one of their key accomplishments. In Songhai, a key accomplishment was that it was the largest empire of West Africa. You can infer that because Songhai was the largest empire, trade was very important to Songhai.
Trade has greatly impacted the world in many ways. Trade is the exchange of goods. People trade because they want to better themselves with things they need or want. People can also trade ideas and religions. Sea routes and land routes were most important to be able to trade.
Africa is one instance where there was a very large trading system, but it caused negative results. The main thing traded in Africa was the slaves. These slaves were treated brutally, with conditions like hundreds of people crammed onto a single, small ship. While on these ships, millions of Africans died due to mistreatment,
In order for trade to work effectively there must be communication on all sides. From a social aspect, trade encourages socialization because communication is at the core. However, in certain cases trade does not always benefit all participants. Populations can be wiped out, which hurts socialization within their community.
Even though these aspects describe the ways that change occurred with trade between Afro-Eurasia, one important part did stay the same. North Africa was consistent and always a key part of trade between the continents of Europe, Africa, and Asia. In 300, North Africa was the only area that traded with the Mediterranean. In the time of the gold-salt trade, European venders and Islamic merchants arrived in North Africa. North African merchants still traded even when Europeans started to shift the balance of trade to the Americas starting from the mid-1400s. This is how trade systems between Africa and Europe stayed the same between the years 300-1450.
The Olmec traded with people who lived hundred of miles away from them. They traded celts,masks,figurines, and small statues. As a result of their trading the Olmec Culture spread through much of Africa. That is what they mainly were known for their trading.
Interregional trade in Africa also caused the diffusion of cultural aspects throughout the continent. Trading promoted
They had trade route practically everywhere places like Russia, The Middle East, Northern India, China. The result of having such luxurious and flowing and well developed trade routes were that very expensive income came in. that kept Viking controlled places going and flowing. Without the use of trade the Vikings and their territory would have or could have stumbled and then crumbled and just fell apart. They developed market towns that needed people to work in them. So, jobs came into play along with the concept of currency. With invasions and war in or near the towns; the language was affected like the American language
If there was ever an important period historians, and people could put a finger on, this would be it. This is the important period where the world’s countries, kingdoms, and dynasties established trade routes. This is the period where countries were made and countries were destroyed because of the importance of trade and the importance of building a fundamental, religious, and economical way of life. This paper will discuss the goals and functions of trades, and traders, and a historical analysis of world trade. This paper will also get into world trade patterns, of The Americas, Sub-Saharan Africa, The Indian Ocean, The Silk routes, China and The South China Sea, Europe and The Mediterranean, and The Atlantic Exploration.
For example, individuals would trade food with a sheep, so they can use wool to make clothing. Additionally, trade expanded techknowledge. People learned how to produce variety of costumes. They started using distinct patterns and embroidery and developed different
Today’s world is shrinking. Not literally of course, but the advances in technology make it easy to span thousands of miles of land and sea, so people can immediately communicate with each other. The internet has connected the world instantly, and planes make traveling from one side of the world to the other a piece of cake compared to the long, dangerous sea voyages of the past. People move and migrate constantly, all the while exchanging ideas and goods. Trade has always played an important role in human history. Whether the swapping of an apple for an orange, or $12 million dollars for a new dam, the fluid movement of goods and services from one to another is how humans have been able to receive things they might not have had
The new trade theory began to emerge in the 1970s when a number of economists pointed out that the ability of firms to attain economies of scale might have important implications for international trade (Wickramasekera, Cronk & Hill 2013). This theory is based on two major concepts that are economies of scale and first-mover advantage. To elaborate: