How is identity formed, a look at some of the theories

Assignment #1 February 12, 12 Do you agree with the following statements? The theory of primordialism best explains the formation of all identity groups (based on nation, race, ethnicity, or religion) or identity politics (groups tied to a nation, race, ethnicity, or religion and who get involved in politics in order to achieve certain goals for one’s identity group) within countries. Furthermore, identity groups within a country always engage in violence with each other on a grand scale and

Anarchy is a significant concept in international relations theory (IR), and is commonly understood as the absence of global governor in the international system (Donnelly 2000:9). Both constructivism and realism agree that the international system is anarchic, but share wide differences on the meaning and understanding of anarchy and how it is affected by the international system. This paper is first going to look at the meaning of social construct, realism approach to anarchy and then constructivism

understand family dynamics, one must understand family theories. Eight family theories were discussed in our book. Each person who studies family theories tends to truly understand several of the theories while showing favoritism towards a particular theory. The two theories I best understood are symbolic interaction theory and social exchange theory. Social exchange theory will be the theory that I will critique. The symbolic interaction theory states that individual’s act based on symbolic meaning

Throughout our lives, we often look ahead to the future, waiting in perpetual anticipation to see what we will become. Alas, what we

the theory stating that social categorization reflects individual information such as race, gender, age, etc., while also having a concern for information about the relationship between groups (Fitzsimons & Shah, 2009). In addition, Reicher and Hopkins (2001) shed light on the possible dangers of taking categories for granted, by

much easier to feel the self than to define the self’ (Allport, 1961, p.128). This could be due to self and identity being understood differently by both traditional and critical social psychologists. Critical social psychologists view the self as reflexive and intersubjective, whereby an individual observes and responds to their own behaviour (Mead, 1934). This approach views self and identity as being socially constructed through social interactions (Stainton Rogers, 2011). Traditional social psychologists

enemies and conflicts. The inner circle is the majority of one’s social interactions, especially at a young age, when they are the most impressionable, these social interactions are a quintessential part of forming their identity. Where and how one lives also greatly influences how they develop, it can decide many

Karl Marx’s Theory Karl Marx was one of the many sociologist who was trying to look at society and how it can function in a new way. Marx’s was a German social philosopher, cultural commentator, and was political activist. He developed the terms “Conflict Theory” and “Marxism”. To start off with conflict theory is defined as a paradigm that see social conflict as the basis of society, social change and emphases a materialist view of society. Social inequality which is the unequal distribution

Symbolic interaction offers a dramaturgical perspective of how people identify and create their social self through social interaction. Many social theorist studies social interaction/ self as a function to our society. In addition, microsociology develop the idea of applying social interaction on a smaller sample size within the society. Therefore, there were an increase in the study of human interaction and the self. Mead develop his idea through symbolic interaction and social psychology of

figure out what is going on with clients and how best to help them. Erikson provides a clear and accurate perception of the various transitions in a person 's psychosocial development. Erik Erikson was born in Frankfurt Germany in 1902, where he was raised by his mother and stepfather. Erikson never had a relationship with his real father and felt his stepfather did not treat him the same as his biological children. Erikson struggled with his own identity and later in his life started researching