How to Acquire Knowledge

The CPCAB model underpins all CPCAB’s qualifications. It consists of three parts, which together form a working model of the counsellor. The first two parts also provide a working model of the helper.

| The study of knowledge: What constitutes knowledge, the nature of knowledge, and whether knowledge is possible

Identify and explain how one could gain access to the people and places where this knowledge can be learned? - 2-3 sentences

I belief that saying that a person can be taught to have knowledge is the same as saying a person who already beliefs in a topic or subject has a opinion. Which we know that opinion can be taught, but so can knowledge because you are teaching an opinion that soon will become a piece of information in a person's mind and that is what the definition is for knowledge. In other words, by learning an Opinion then they also will be receiving knowledge. Again like Socrates explains what Daedalus had told him about how we all will always have knowledge but our true opinion can be lost and maybe never be thought again. For a true opinion to stay in our minds we need to practice and think about the idea or a fact and turn it into an argument.

There is no doubt that knowledge has undeniable value in todayworld. As society tends to say, education is the key to success. And since education gives birth to knowledge, knowledge must be a priority. True in many regards. But lets take a closer look at how knowledge relates to advances in science. Lack of knowledge will keep our world at a standstill. We need to know, even the basics, of how to do something before anything can be accomplished. However, when the knowledge is acquired, it is the human factor that comes into play. It is taking that knowledge and putting it to a functional use.

Knowledge is based on what is, or truths. The only established truths are the forms. The forms represent true, eternal, unchanging, or facts. Knowledge stems from the idea of forms. One who has knowledge must understand the forms. Only a

In order to properly explain my interest in “How to Learn Anything Instantly,” and subsequent review I feel as if I need to explain that I am a recent septic shock survivor. Many survivors find knowledge and abilities that once came easy are now much harder or completely gone. Most doctors will say this is either because of the oxygen deprivation to corresponding areas of the brain and the information and abilities will forever be lost or is a result of the trauma, very similar to PTSD and the skills may or may not come back, if the patient is dedicated enough to put up with the failures and let downs along the way. I am stubborn and refuse to believe I can not retrain my brain and be the person I once was, so books like this always catch my eye.

needs to have conforming dimensions and facts to have an understanding of the knowledge of

Knowledge can be produced using a variety of different methods. However, in the natural sciences sense perception through observation is used primarily. This can be seen through the work of researchers who often observe the results of experiments and trends in order to analyze different phenomena and perspectives. While there are many scientific methods based on scientific thinking using logic and predictability, the idea that

Knowledge is a simple two syllable word that can have an infinite amount of branches extending above the truck of a tall Susquehanna Tree and an infinite amount of roots extending below the tall Susquehanna Tree. Knowledge is the main stronghold to an infinite amount of ideas, thoughts, and theories. Knowledge is the main stronghold to the network of ways of knowing, just like how the trunk of a tall Susquehanna Tree is the main stronghold to the network of branches and to the network of roots that extends from the trunk of the tree. Without the trunk of the tall Susquehanna Tree, the existence of the long beautiful branches will be eliminated, along with the beautiful green leaves. Also without the trunk of the tall Susquehanna Tree, the roots of the tree will rot and no longer provide life source to the main trunk, which effects other Susquehanna Trees surrounding the main Susquehanna Tree, because the roots of all the trees connect, so if one dies, the whole forest will be extinct. This can relate to knowledge if it is to be not existing because there would not be any ways of knowing and without the ways of knowing, then there is no area of knowledge. Knowledge is like the trunk of a tall Susquehanna Tree in the middle of a forest, it is the base for a sign of nature and a sign of life. Knowledge and education, go hand in hand about information, facts, and skills that are also obtained through awareness or recognition. Knowledge is acquired by ways of knowing, which are

Knowledge, as we all understand, can be general or specialized. We are able to gather knowledge about certain aspects of reality, branches of science, skills, traits and phenomena observable in nature. But there is another kind of “knowledge”, which is the sum of every subcategoric, specific knowledge. This knowledge is what we know about the “world” - how knowledgeable we are, how well can we navigate the seas of reality because of our knowledge about its currents, flows and hidden reefs.

Knowledge is defined to be facts, information, and skills acquired through experience or education. There are two categories that fall under knowledge; personal knowledge and shared knowledge. Shared knowledge refers to what “we know because.” It can also be defined as communicated and constructed knowledge; within culture, social norms, and semiotics. Personal knowledge refers to “I know because.” An expanded definition of personal knowledge refers to personal experiences, values, and perceptions. Shared knowledge changes and evolves over time because of methods that are continuously shared. It is assembled by a group of people. Personal knowledge, on the other hand, depends crucially on the experiences of a particular individual. It is gained

Knowledge lies at the foundation of everything in society. While it may not always be noticed, it is always present. This knowledge is used in an array of processes such as creativity, experimentation, analysis, and so much more. From process to process, or area of knowledge to area of knowledge, all knowledge incorporates the processes of both transformation and description in order to evolve as justifiable beliefs. Transformative knowledge includes the product of an individual’s implementation of their personal cognitive processes to challenge traditional perspectives, while descriptive knowledge results when individuals utilize the new perspectives, allowing fresh outlooks to be perceived. While all areas of knowledge incorporate the use of both processes, some may primarily use one or the other. This can be seen in the areas of art and natural sciences. Knowledge in arts seems to primarily describe the world, while knowledge in natural sciences seeks to transform it through innovation and much more.

The scope of Natural Sciences is to create principles, theories and laws about the natural world. Natural Sciences theories and laws are based on a scientific methodology (hypothetico-deductive method ). The scientific method always tries to connect theory and observation, this is one manner to consistently organize our observation of the natural world . Experiments are often used in order to replicate aspects of the world in which we are interested. In fact, following this method before stating something to be true scientists needs first to arrange an hypothesis then make some tests in order to prove the theory and finally make up the law. Doing that we can say to acquire a proof and, therefore, good knowledge.

Knowledge can be defined as information gained through sense perception, emotion, language and reason, while it is defined by Plato as “justified true belief.” The claim that knowledge takes the form of a combination of stories and facts is however not accurate in history and biology. First, it brings up the questions of what are stories and what are facts. Stories are accounts of past events from somebody’s perspective, while a fact is the truth. When looking at the two areas of knowledge, they each favour one side of the combination over the other. For example, knowledge from history mostly takes the form of stories, while knowledge from biology mostly takes the form of facts. This distinction between the different types of knowledge leads to the knowledge questions of “How do we obtain knowledge in the different areas of knowing?” and “To what extend is knowledge in certain areas of knowledge subjective or objective?”