How to Arm the FDA Essays

Its seems obvious that the organization with food in its name, the Food and Drug Administration, should be in charge of our country's food safety and food labels. This agency has the experience and knowledge to devise a labeling standard that incorporates all pertinent information. I have confidence in the FDA.

As children, we rarely look at the back of our chocolate bar or care what elements are in the french fries we indulge in. Whilst getting older, we become more conscious of what is going into our food, and what we put in our bodies. We are more aware of the places that we go to eat, and are constantly looking at reviews. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is a government federal agency whose purpose is to ensure our safety as consumers. There are various factors that the FDA oversees, thus requiring a substantial budget. Last year, the over-all spent was 4.8 billion dollars, which is generally made from taxes and user fees from the drug industry. They regulate food consumption,

"A formal written Food Defense Plan has been developed and implemented (includes vulnerability assessment and broad and focused mitigations as appropriate based on risk; vulnerability assessment clearly covers key activity types such as bulk receiving/storage, mixing, and secondary ingredient handling etc.). Observation: The current approved Food Defense Plan is approved by Quality and this process does not include Site Director signoff at this time. The current approved plan does not cover key activity types/vulnerabilities with matched mitigation strategies. The site has a drafted Food Defense Plan using the FDA Plan Builder, currently unapproved.

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) are government agencies that coordinate with one another to ensure the safety of our nation’s food supply. For instance, the FDA is responsible for protecting the public health by assuring safety, effectiveness, quality and security of human/veterinary drugs, vaccines, and medical services. In addition, the FDA is also responsible for all cosmetics and dietary supplements, tobacco and products of radiation. There is a law in place, which has been recently signed by President Obama on January 4, 2001 called the Food Safety Modernization Act. This reformed food safety law is over sighted by the FDA agency to ensure that the U.S. food supply is safe, by focusing on ways to prevent contamination from previously reported

Before the Pure Food and Drug Act, food was produced and sold in a manner that left holes in information necessary for consumers health. Food that today would be considered toxic was sold to everyday consumers. After the Industrial Revolution, it became common for people to buy their food from large food suppliers instead of family farmers. Many consumers weren't aware of the conditions of large industrial factories, but many people's opinions changed once their food’s real quality surfaced to the public by muckraker journalists. The Pure Food and Drug Act was the most perpetual aspect of the Progressive Era: the act offered consumers reassurance of what they ate and took as medication, prevented a great deal of illnesses, and led way to

In Zinczenco’s view “I'd say the industry is vulnerable. Fast-food companies are marketing to children a product with proven health hazards and no warning labels. They would do well to protect themselves, and their customers, by providing the nutrition information people need to make informed choices about their products” (Zinczenco, 2002.) In making this comment, Zinczenco urges fast food

The Food Drug and Cosmetic Act contains a labeling law for any positive and negative “material” changes to the nutrition of food. For example, trans fats are labeled because they are related to cardiovascular disease (Murphy). Products containing peanuts and other allergens are required to be labeled due to the potential adverse health effects if eaten by individuals with nut or other allergies. In 1992, the Food and Drug Administration addressed the labeling of GMOs in a policy statement amended to the act. The policy states that foods developed by genetic

There are many aspects of the Food and Drug Administration’s current regulations that are of great concern to many. For instance, the regulation of GMOs, or genetically modified organisms, is a largely debated subject, especially in relation to genetically modified food, or GM food. As described by nongmoproject.com, “GMOs, or “genetically modified organisms,” are plants or animals that have been genetically engineered with DNA from bacteria, viruses, or other plants and animals. These experimental combinations of genes from different species cannot occur in nature or in traditional crossbreeding.” Most of the American population may not even realize this, but according to nongmoproject.com: “In the U.S., GMOs are in as much as 80% of

Food quality has emerged over the past decade as a top concern for consumers leaving many large food brands struggling to adapt. Growing concern over the rate of obesity, genetically modified organisms (GMO), and overuse of antibiotic are the most significant drivers leading consumers to purchase healthier food. New companies are successfully targeting this demographic using terms such as “Non GMO”, “Gluten – Free”, and “Organic.” Meanwhile revenue continues to decline for legacy food companies including, General Mills, Kellogg Co, and Kraft Foods Inc. struggle to adapt to changing consumer preferences. Large traditional food companies are seeking to counter these trends by acquiring existing health food companies, developing new products,

To begin we will be discussing the federal Agency called food and drugs administration better known as FDA. As a federal agency the FDA has a lot of responsibility with regulating food and drug safety. The FDA works to provide good medical services and insured food products. The FDA works to support our country so that we can live peacefully and healthily but they don't just stop there they wish to help other countries and have even expanded there work to other countries such as China and Costa Rica. So the FDA holds a big part in our society and we as citizens need to be aware of this.

2. the second failure of the U.S law from the movie is overlooking health of the country by allowing big corporation to produce cheap processed food. The movie show different case of health concerns that resulted from eating cheap processed food. From Kevin’s case of dying with E. coli from eating burger and the husband family who have diabetes because of eating cheap food. Government failed to help the families that were looking apologies and justice from big corporations. I would think agency like FDA in charge of the safety of domestic food would assess potential exposure and health risks of cheap processed food before they can be on the market. However, as we saw in the movie, the lobbyists for the big food corporation can help them to bring their commodity on the market with or without assessment of the health risk of their products. Count words: 142

The FDA is moving in a direction of the food industry that they don’t need to regulate. The FDA is moving its mission as established by the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act of 1938, heritage Foundation research fellow Daren Bakst writes “into novel areas that are unrelated to the food-safety issues that the law is designed to regulate, it would do so by regulating nutrition and diet through limiting food choices.” What the FDA is doing is combining nutritional and dietary well-being with safety and this doesn't work. Something such as an ingredient that causes health problems is one thing for the FDA to address seeing that it is in their job descriptions. Consumers can take control of their own diet and their trans fat consumption. The FDA

A very important story that has been hidden from the public is the story of a family from Vermont who used to milk sheep and sell the milk. This incident happened prior to the change of law in 2011. Up until 2011 farmers were allowed to sell up to 1,120 quarts of milk per week directly to the consumer in the state of Vermont (Agency of Agriculture Food and Markets). The FDA who claimed that the sheep were ill with mad (Linda Failace)cows disease harassed the family; this disease has never been found in any sheep prior or surrounding this incident. The sheep had been imported from the Netherlands and Belgium, before they left the country they were held in quarantine for 2 months and upon arriving in the U.S. held for another month (Farmageddon). In both sessions of quarantine the same tests were given, including testing for mad cows disease, and everything came back with flying colors. After the family had successfully built their sheep farm and were doing well, enjoying their life and contributing to their community, the FDA started telling them that their sheep were under quarantine again. They threatened the family not allowing them to tell anyone what was happening. They were able to secure a court date and flew in the scientists from the Netherlands and Belgium to confirm that the flock the sheep came from were not ever diagnosed with mad cows disease and showed no sign of being ill. The family confirmed that the sheep had never been fed feed made with ground up cows, which is how mad cows disease spreads, despite the efforts of the family and all the evidence they provided, the FDA still seized their sheep and took them to Iowa to kill for a disease that never existed (Farmageddon). While the FDA claims to be there to help people, they have really only caused more problems for the

1) “Preventive Control”, this is the first time the FDA have a legislative mandate to require comprehensive, science-based preventive controls across the food supply. This mandate includes: mandatory preventive controls for food facilities, mandatory produce safety standards, and authority to prevent intentional contamination. Mandatory preventive controls for food facilities means food facilities are required to implement a written preventive

Nutritional Foods Inc., a company that manufactures healthful products, has a major problem to address. Some of the company's products are allegedly responsible for a number of acute food poisoning cases. The problem has escalated from just a few cases of food poisoning to dozens of other reported cases. The company's chief executive, Fred James, has convened an emergency meeting comprising of members of the Crisis Action Committee. The key agenda of the meeting is how the situation that is threatening to get out of hand should be handled.