How to Conduct Search for Voter ID Details through SMS?

Voter ID laws in the United States have begun to create controversy since the beginning of its adaptations in the early 2000’s. Voter ID laws in the United States is a law that requires U.S. citizens to have a special form of identification in order to vote in an election. The idea with Voter ID laws is that the state must make sure that the laws do not pose any sort of burden on the voters. These laws have been proposed in order to stop voting fraud. However, the institution of Voter ID laws have made trouble in states, including Texas, regarding to the various amount of identification requirements needed.

Democrats, who almost unanimously oppose voter identification laws, strongly feel that minority groups of voters, who tend to vote Democratic, are more likely to not have the resources, knowledge, or means to have or obtain the necessary identification requirements for the polls. In a research project developed by Matt A. Barreto, Stephen A. Nuño, and Gabriel R. Sanchez, testing was conducted to “determine the rates of access to valid photo identification among voters and non-voters in Indiana, with an eye towards specific demographic groups, such as the elderly and racial minorities” (Barreto, Nuño, and Sanchez 112). Indiana was selected because of its strict voter identification law and for the ability to closely assess specific segments of the electorate under such a law. Their research method, using a random telephone survey of 1,000 registered and 500 non-registered voters, was conducted in a way that was unbiased and provided the most reliable and accurate results possible (Barreto, Nuño, and Sanchez

The county chooses several voting locations to have an in-person early voting. Arriving at the poll site, voters must possess an acceptable form of identification; this includes a driver’s license or non-driver’s identification card, tribal government issued identification, long-term certificate or a voter’s affidavit. For voting on election day North Dakota voters must include on their identification their name, their current street address and their date of birth. North Dakota utilizes photo-identification at the election, but it is not the only acceptable form of identification; whereas, Pennsylvania only require an acceptable form of identification for first time voter. Some examples are a Pennsylvania driver’s license, student ID, United States passport, etc. Pennsylvania not having an in-person early voting is beneficial to the citizens because the state holds numerous amounts of citizens compared to North Dakota; it would be a hassle to hold multiple days for election instead of just one day. Pennsylvania may not be tough on photo identification because it is a competitive state, whereas North Dakota is not a competitive

So instead of jousting over the voter ID laws, should we come up with state of the art ways, so that citizens can get free ID’s, and ways for those that can’t do it themselves to possibly have a mobile service, so that all voters have an equal voting ground. A 2012 study, by Pew Center on the states, found that 2.8 million voters had

Consequently, voter ID laws were enacted around the country. The laws require eligible voters to produce government-issued identification before casting a countable ballot at the polls. Voter identification, categorized between strict and

The topics discussed in this research paper are some of the political issues that the people of the United States face everyday. Starting with the Voter ID laws, which were first enacted in the 1950’s by South Carolina (1). Since than it has been a method used by registered voters to present some type of formal identification before voting at there local government poll. This created a way to insure that residents of the united states did not vote multiple times and that the actual resident registered to vote was being represented. Although the disadvantages of the Voter ID laws are also endless, by enforcing identification to be present during the time voting period people who did not have the proper documentation were not allowed to vote. This created a demising situation between people who were legally registered to vote but did not have the proper identification document to vote therefore creating less votes in the voting process.

According to the National Conference of State Legislatures, such proposals were considered by 34 states in 2011, and in 32 states in 2012# . Nine states now have laws in place that require citizens to show government-issued photo identification before casting a valid ballot.

There are thirty states in the United States that require some form of official identification in order to register to vote and to vote for federal, state, and local elections. Voter identification laws ensure the integrity of elections by deterring impersonation fraud at the polls. Requiring a government-issued ID to vote will prevent voting under fake names or under the names of deceased voters, which according to The Pew Center of the States “more than 1.8 million deceased individuals are listed as voters”.

The necessity or redundancy of voter photo identification is a prominent topic in the news as the presidential election approaches. Multiple states in America require proper photo identification in order to vote, but not all agree with these laws. “Why New Photo ID Laws Mean Some Won't Vote” by PBS argues that photo identification laws prevent millions of Americans from voting due to the often difficult process of obtaining one. “Voter ID Should Be Required for Voting” by Chris Freind supports the opposite view, believing that photo identification laws ensure only American citizens are allowed to

Have you ever thought about how many illegal immigrants can cross the border and easily vote because no photo ID is required? There is definitely voter fraud in this country, which has a huge effect on the presidential election. If the congress would make it a law, then only eligible voters can vote. Photo ID is very important for voting, if Americans want to stop voter fraud, then they need to make it a requirement for all states.

There has been a recent surge of voter ID legislation around the country in Republican concentrated states. The rise of voter ID laws is also contributed officials wanting to decrease identity fraud in the polls. Voter ID laws have been passed as early as 1950 in South Carolina which voters needed a document with the voters' name. Since then gradually states adopted voter ID laws, but voter ID laws became an issue in the 2000s.All the states except for Rhode Island with voter ID laws are primarily Republican.

As of February 2016, 33 states enforced voter identification requirements. The voter identification law is a law that requires specifics identification in order to avoid fraud during the election. Under the Voting Rights Act, states and localities with a history of racial discrimination needed to get permission from the federal government to enact any changes to their voting laws, in a process called “preclearance.”

The best way to fix this problem is to stop requiring photo ID at the polling booths which would allow anyone to go vote. There are ways to identify voter fraud instead of requiring a photo ID.

“Minority registered voters were 20 percent more likely to lack DMV-issued identification, and therefore effectively disenfranchised by the new law,” the release said. “ In the same case, it will be nearly impossible for one to have a photo identification card if they do not have a birth certificate, which is always the primary form of identification, making them vulnerable to the system.”

No ballots can be misplaced and there is no need for poll workers to help a voter out by looking over the voters shoulder, then making changes where necessary (Voting Technology Project). People are looking to protect their privacy and make sure that there vote is one of the votes that really count. The problem is that it is not safe to have a paper or receipt type thing printed out for a voter, this type of thing could lead to a wide spread buying of votes by the separate sides. Buying votes is obviously something neither side wants to see happen.