preview

Howard Roark Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document

Howard Roark is the personification of the phrase, “I do what I want.”. He doesn’t do anything other than for his own reasons. He is expelled from college in his third year for refusing to complete the assignments as directed. He is fired from multiple architecture firms, for refusing to bend his ideas or refusing to reach a compromise of any kind. He refuses to take on projects where he will not be given complete creative freedom to design his buildings. He lives to make himself happy, designing buildings as he envisions them makes him happy, and so he does nothing else, he plays no political games, he plays nice with no man, and he concedes nothing. This is the embodiment of Objectivism. Roark’s entire life is based on Objectivism, but the …show more content…

First, he presents the idea of the creator as the tortured soul. He mentions Prometheus being punished for bringing fire to mankind, he mentions the inventor of the wheel, being torn apart, with his own invention being used against him, consequently generating the feeling of sympathy for creators. Next, the creator is painted as superior, he relies on no man, for man had rejected him, the creator works for himself, and for his craft. This puts every man in the room in the position of the inferior. It is now understood throughout the courtroom, that Howard Roark is the superior, and he demands to be listened to. Following this, he speaks of individuality, he preys on the fears and the hopes of the average, renouncing the masses, for the masses have never loved a creator. Sequently, Roark speaks of altruism, and it dangers, it’s harms, in a time with Hitler in power, a war being fought in the name of democracy and peace, this would be especially effective; everyone in that courtroom probably knew someone who had died for the altruism he spoke of. He then speaks of the purity of the creator and the self, “The creator is not concerned with disease, but with life.” (Rand 682). He talks of independence and dependence, and its influence on humanity. Then he introduces the idea of the parasite, the second hand, the rulers, and explains that they are the destroyers of the ego. Finally, …show more content…

Roark comes to Dominique’s country home and rapes her. After this, it is explained that supposedly without any verbal communication what so ever, that they both understood what the other wanted out of the sexual encounter. This sets the precedent for the entire relationship, one based off of power exchanges. Dominique explains that she wants to be Roark’s totally and completely but that she will be working against him the entire time. For the duration of this part of their affair, Dominique thwarts Roark’s attempts to obtain commissions giving them instead to Peter Keating. This can be seen as both an up and a down of their relationship, however, it was mutually discussed and agreed upon beforehand, so no matter how odd or wrong it seems, to them, this behavior was acceptable. Next, Dominique poses for a statue, and then testifies for Roark at his first trial, afterwards, deciding she must leave him. After this part of the affair, they part ways after professing their love for each other, Dominique is going to marry Peter Keating as a twisted form of self torture and a test of her character. This part of the relationship, doesn’t make any sense, Howard Roark, who does what he wants, and what makes him happy, the same man who raped Dominique because he wanted to, would not have let her go, it conflicts with the idea of Objectivism and his personal goals. Nevertheless, Dominique leaves and marries Peter.

Get Access