Hrm 531 Week 3 Stock Paper

Marketing is often thought of as advertising and selling, but marketing encompasses more than just selling a product or service and advertising it to entice customers to make a purchase. Perrault, Cannon, and McCarthy (2009) defined marketing as "the performance of activities that seek to accomplish an organization’s objectives by anticipating customer or client needs and directing a flow of need satisfying goods and services from producer to customer or client" (p. 6). However, Kotler and Keller (2009) stated one of the shortest definitions is "meeting needs profitably" (p. 5). The author's definition of marketing includes all of the activities a business

Portfolio Return of a portfolio with two stocks (Stock A and Stock B) is given by following formula:

In the overall industry, Starbucks is above the industrial average. While, the industry grew at 6.20%, Starbucks saw an 11% increase in earnings growth from 2015 to 2016 (Starbucks Corporation Stock Research - Analyst Summary). Consensus recommendation indicates a current strong buy; the environment is ripe for buying Starbucks stock (Starbucks Corporation Stock Research -

Imagine trying to balance having a large family, having a job, and being the leader of a large scout troop. There are many important jobs and tasks that have to be done for each of these responsibilities. These are just a few of the many important jobs that Mr. Stock has to do in his daily life. I admire how he is able to balance all of these things. Mr. Stock has many kids to take care of. He has a job to be able to support his family. Like that all was not enough for him, he is also the leader at my scout troop. Overall he is a very hardworking, persistent, and kind individual.

When looking at the 2004 DuPont analysis, you see that not only has profit margin increased every year, but it is more than 2% better than the industry average. That being said, Krispy Kreme does not utilize its assets as efficiently as its competitors. This potentially troubling because of the fact that they have gone through aggressive growth in stores recently. Is this an indication that these stores are not generating the sales necessary to justify the investment, or at least as well as its competitors might be able to? Finally the equity multiplier comes in below the industry average. To us this means that Krispy Kreme does not utilize its leverage as effectively as the competition. Perhaps it would be to Krispy Kreme’s benefit to increase leverage and invest in order to increase growth and earnings in a similar manner to its competition. Overall, we believe that Krispy Kreme is moderately

To justify this claim, during the past twelve months, Yum received a revenue figure, according to Reuters, of $9.56 billion. This number was a 5.05% increase compared to the previous year number. While this increase in margin was a bit below the average year-to-year increase of 6.58%, the difference in growth decline was only a 23% difference. Other companies like Brinker saw a 43% deceleration during this same time period. In addition, while some investors may critique the industry 11.31% growth in sales during the past to Yum's lower numbers, it is also important to realize that Yum supports the seconds highest sales figure in its industry, and appreciation of revenue growth will be much difficult than smaller-capitalization companies to come-by. This is in addition to the fact that many lower-revenue companies in this industry are actually seeing negative sales growth (not deceleration) during the same time frame as the aforementioned analysis. With these thoughts on sales at hand, these numbers can be used at the broadest of levels to illustrate that the steady increase and influx of money into Yum over its career has aided in the appreciation of its share price. Since 2003, not once has Yum seen a calendar year decrease in price. This comes with a 25% appreciation in 2006 and a 12% escalation so far in 2007--despite the recent economic turmoil. These sales and share price indications illustrate that Yum will fair very

Starbucks is known for their Frappuccino’s; unfortunately they are on a downward spiral in sales due to competitors such as McDonalds. In 2008 Starbucks admits to its losses due to their competitors. “Company executives now freely admit that such thinking is largely to blame for the woes that led to Tuesday’s announcement that Starbucks will close 600 U.S. stores and eliminate thousands of jobs. The coffee giant’s missteps have come at a spectacularly bad time, hitting as the economic slump deepens and consumers are seeing their discretionary spending eaten up by rising gas prices and grocery bills (Linn).”

About everyone at some age, at some point or another, and in some country has gotten a sample of American's symbol for fast food through the golden arches of McDonald's. This report will attempt to analyze the external and internal sectors that affect the company's success. The external analysis will provide opportunities and threats while the internal analysis will show indicators of strength and weakness. It will then follow up with critical issues, strategic alternatives, recommendations and implementation. The case studied is found in Appendix 2 of Mary Coulter's "Strategic Management in Action" book.

Starbucks financial statements were analyzed for the fiscal year ended September 27, 2015. Like all public companies, annual and quarterly financial statements are required to allow regulators and other interested parties to analyze the financial status and management decision making of the company. This analysis focuses on the results of Starbucks most recent published annual report containing their balance sheets, statement of earnings and cash flows. These statements will be analyzed against the results of one of its competitors, Dunkin Donuts, to investigate how the two companies compare to each other. It was noted that Starbucks and Dunkin Donuts do not have corresponding fiscal year ends. The data therefore is not directly comparable since the reports do not reflect the same time period of data but should provide additional insight. The paper will attempt to provide a brief analysis of Starbucks operations in terms of its liquidity, leverage, activity, profitability and growth ratios used by analysts in the industry.

The restaurant industry “operates restaurants and other eating places, including full-service restaurants, quick-service restaurants, cafeterias, buffets, and snack bars” (Restaurants). The fast food sector has a number of popular companies like McDonald’s and Wendy’s. Fast food chains earn the majority of their success by offering quick, inexpensive meals made uniformly around the world (Nath). This project will be focused on comparing the financial ratios and statements from McDonald’s (MCD) and Wendy’s (WEN). The analysis will take an unbiased approach when comparing the companies. The comprehensive analysis will include: the company’s financial statements, including the balance sheets, income statements, and statement of cash flows, calculating the financial ratios, deciding which external factors could influence the company’s profits, and finally making a recommendation on which stock will have a positive effect on a potential investor’s portfolio.

Starbucks’ shares have grown more than 1500% over the past decade. Financially, it has been an oak tree in an ever changing economy with customers that have ever changing demands. However, there has been increased concern for the financial viability of the coffee shop a recently announced plan to close down over 600 stores that were said to be underperforming domestically. That means that more than 1,000 jobs will be eliminated. As scary as that is on the local front to top management, the executive staff feels that it is the only way to recover from it’s shocking $108.7M loss for the 2nd quarter this fiscal year.

Thesis: While Starbucks has been an industry leader in the specialty coffee market, rapid overexpansion and current economic conditions have caused it to lose its market dominance. Is the company strong enough to recover?

I have chosen the company named by Mc Donald’s for my assignment topic as it is a worldwide and well-known fast food company covered in Asia and Europe countries .

The determinants of Starbucks profitability over time are variable costs and fixed costs. “A variable cost is a cost that change in direct proportion to a change in the level of activity (dict). Variable costs for Starbucks would include labor, coffee beans, dairy, and plastic products. A fixed cost is indirect costs of business expenses that remain unchanged (dict). Fixed costs for Starbucks include rent, taxes, and insurance as well as advertising. In the figure below (fig 1) we have Starbucks financial data in millions for the year of 2015. This includes their operating expenses, net revenues, such as company-operated stores, licensed stores, CPG, food service. It also includes their total net revenues and their balance sheet. As we can see “Operating costs dropped in the fiscal year

Another stock I bought was Yum Brand, which has a ticker symbol YUM. I bought 21 shares. Each share was $75.41. Yum Brands operates fast food restaurants in the United States and internationally. The fast food places are Taco Bell, KFC, and Pizza Hut. I chose this stock because I had Taco Bell a few days ago.