preview

Hubert Blumer's Theory Of Symbolic Interaction

Decent Essays

A student of social science is required to scrutinize the theories of many social scientists. This task can be abstruse without a framework with which to analyze those theories. Tom Campbell describes five parameters that can be useful when studying or comparing social theories. These parameters aren’t clear-cut categories, but ranges or areas within which an idea or theory can fall. Despite these ranges, Hubert Blumer’s theory of symbolic interaction can be said to fall somewhat more to one part of these parameters than the other. Symbolic interaction, as described by Blumer, is more of an idealist than a materialist, more descriptive than normative, more individualistic than holistic, more related to conflict than to consensus, and more accurately understood through an interpretive model than through a positivist one. This paper will endeavor to demonstrate that his views primarily fall in line with these parameters, even though there are aspects of each contained within his theory. Regarding the parameter of idealist to materialist, Hubert Blumer’s theory of symbolic interaction falls firmly on the idealist side of the range. He does spend some time discussing how the process of self-indication essentially turns what is observed into an object, which is then given a meaning. However, the significant part is not the object, but that the person doing the observing is interpreting the object being observed and giving it meaning. If the idealist is someone who believes that human society is known through thoughts, feelings and subjective experience, then Blumer’s theory, centering on the process of interpretation performed by an observer, is an excellent example of that parameter. Blumer uses his writing on symbolic interaction to describe what the theory means, to discuss work by Mead that it draws on, and examine how it relates to the study of human societies. At no time does he use his theory to consider how humans should act in a situation, or to explain why they should act in that way. Rather, he simply describes the mechanics symbolic interaction. He discusses how an individual performs the activities required for symbolic interaction, and how that individual’s actions extend to social interactions.

Get Access