Hugo Chavez

One reason Cesar Chavez was an effective leader was because he created a union known as the United Farm Workers. Chavez’s goal was to organize the farmers to receive better pay and better working conditions. He was not the first to attempt, others have tried but failed due to the power of growers. He was different, he gained support through encouragement. His exact words were “si se puede”(Doc A) meaning “it can be done”. He encouraged his supporters to seek their rights as farmers. “ The strongest act of manliness, is to sacrifice ourselves for other in a totally nonviolent struggle for justice”(Doc C). Chavez along

Chavez was a Latino farmer. He migrated to Arizona. Cesar Chavez was working in the South in hot fields and vineyards. After his forceful speech, he was known as a religious and spiritual person. From Chavez’s background, he understands the hard workers

Cesar Chavez was a Latino civil rights activist, born to Librado and Juana Estrada Chavez on the thirty-first of March in the year 1927. During The Great Depression, he was obligated to move to California with his family to work in the vine fields. After moving to California as a young man he joined the United States Army serving two years during World War II. He later married Helen Fabela Chavez and together they had eight children. Chavez later passed away on April twenty-third 1993 in San Luis, Arizona, he was able to achieve the Presidential Medal of Freedom in 1994 for his civil rights movement. Therefore Cesar Chavez is certainly a hero, he improved the life of many Latino immigrant workers during the Great Depression by promoting non violence protesting, improving working conditions, and creating an organization.

Chavez did not like school because he did not speak English very well and Spanish was forbidden in the school he was attending at the time. All of his teachers spoke English. He would get punished with a ruler to his knuckles for speaking Spanish. In 1942 Chavez had graduated the 8th grade. He could not attend high school because he had to work for his family to earn money, so instead he became a migrant farm worker. People today want their children to learn about Chavez so that the generations to come might live their lives like his. The significant event that impacted Chavez to become the person he was, was his own experience as a farm worker his whole life. The people that made a significant impact on his life included Martin Luther King Jr. that had said, “As brothers in the fight for equality I extend the hand of fellowship and good will and wish continuing success to you and your members” (cesarchavezholiday.org). Also Gandhi had agreed with Chavez’s act of

He did his best to bring an outcome to better improvement. For instance the author of the article of “Chavez,Cesear” by Jaime Cardenas mentions that Chavez “went on hunger strikes to express his deep commitment to the cause” ( par.3). It’s the thought that counts what he did, however he is not just determine and dedicated he is also hard working. The way Chavez expressed hard work is by “a series of fasts and strikes” (Cardenas par.2). Hard work is put into these events to move forward with volunteers and resources. Within time Chavez fought through hard times for this people because he understood the poverty, the ongoing racism, and the unfair treatment to these people as it included him. Additionally he succeeded through “nonviolent resistance” (Cesar Chavez: Champion of Migrant Farmworkers par.1) and were recognized for the importance of all the farm workers’

Cesar Chavez international hero who helped farm workers obtain better working conditions in the California; in addition, he was often thought as the Hispanic Martin King Jr. His accomplishments ended up changing millions of lives for the better, he would give farm workers the future they hoped and dreamed of. Realizing the struggles his parents went through gave Chavez the inspiration to change farm worker's lives.

He spent the early 1960s traveling among migrant workers trying to lay down the groundwork for organizing them. He knew that migrant workers incomes average a thousand dollars yearly and that they had poor living and working conditions, so along with Dolores Huerta, he co-founded the National Farm Workers Association in 1962. The main purpose of this association was to form a passively resistant union for all farm workers with the consideration of their social and economic situations, two months after the formation of this union I heard of it and immediately followed this Martin K. like leader. I remember my first strike with C.Chavez, it was against the rose growers of Mcfarland, CA, which proved to be successful. It was an honor to stand by such a great man’s side who before I met my hopes of a successful movement were coming to an end as I have tried so many different organizations on so many different periods of time yet no one succeeded uplifting out

Simon Bolivar, a Venezuelan, an aristocrat, an orphan, a slave owner, a widow, these words describe how people could portray a man of such power and influence, but most of them call him the Liberator. Bolivar is known for his role as a revolutionary leader against the Spanish forces that occupied most of South America and helped liberate six countries that would not have been around if not for his constant pursuit for justice. Even today as his story is almost 200 years old, Bolivar still makes an impact in South America by the means of representing the fight for people of all ethnicities, all the people that have been denied justice, and as their perfect and imperfect leader.

As I said before, many critics agreed that Hugo Chavez has been able to diminished Venezuelan democracy to convert it to a competitive authoritarian regime. Chavez has controlled the country and stills does, in a way in that using populism and his policy of clientism he gets the masses and specially the poor to support him and agreed with him in many of his reforms and actions. Allying himself with leftist countries like Bolivia, Ecuador, Nicaragua and especially Cuba, Chavez has implemented what he calls a “Bolivarian Revolution”, revolution that allows him to have a complete control of the country. Furthermore, Chavez has been using the oil revenues not only as a method of getting international support for his ideas and type of regime but also, for his own personal enrichment

Transformational Leadership can be defined as a style of leadership in which the leader identifies the needed change, creates a vision to guide the change through influence and inspiration, and

Simon Bolivar was an amazing leader. He fought for people to be free from dictatorship and showed mercy to people who renounced crimes of the past.

"Democracy is impossible in a capitalist system, capitalism is the realm of injustice and tyranny of the richest against the poorest' (Chavez, 2000) – This statement was made by Hugo Chavez president of Venezuela in a BBC1 interview. The president of Venezuela from 1999-2013 leader of the ‘Bolivarian Revolution' a socialist political program leading the fight for independence for Latin America. Chavez vision was to free the interference of foreign power with revolutionary Marxist ideology. Chavez strived to create a Latin American alliance to expel U.S. influence to compete politically and economically with the European Union. Chavez died on 5th March 2013 at the age of 58. Throughout his rain, Venezuelan people were deeply divided with the

The first leader of Venezuela, Hugo Chavez was not known for much. He was a huge disgrace for Venezuela. Chavez made life hard for the Venezuelan people with his bad policies. He made prices go up by twenty-three percent a year for more than ten years. This brought a lot for hardship for the Venezuelan people, causing to fall behind because they couldn’t afford anything. He made too many big, state owned companies but there were not enough people to work there. and less people to work them, which made the production fail.(Dolack)

Transformational leadership are classified into four components which are pointed out by Bass (1990, p. 28), ‘charisma, idealized influence, inspirational motivation, intellectual stimulation and individualized consideration’. Apart from these basic roles, charisma leadership, a collection of personal characteristics, has its own role of literature since it has similarity with transformational leadership and they are contribution to each other (Bertocci, 2009, p. 43; Judge & Piccolo, 2004, p. 755). Leaders’ behaviour reflects them being role models for their followers. Followers respect, admire and trust their leaders who have charismatic effect on their followers to an extremely high grade are willing to take risks

The three types of leadership I will be comparing are Transformational, Servant, and also Authentic leadership. Authentic leaders are self-actualized individuals who are aware of their strengths, their limitations, and their emotions. They also show their real selves to their followers. They also don’t hide their mistakes or weaknesses out of fear of looking weak. Authentic leaders are able to put the mission and the goals of the organization ahead of their