Hugo Film and Literature Adaptation

I much preferred the movie version to the novel. For me, author William Kennedy’s style of writing is needlessly vague and difficult to follow, yet he did a wonderful job adapting

Normally, when a movie is made about a story in a book the two stories are not exactly the same. The movie is adjusted by adding small details or leaving out some parts in order to make the story more

There are many similarities and some minor differences between the movie, directed by Claude Chabrol, and the short story it is based off of, written by Guy de Maupassant. The plot, setting, and characters are all highly similar in both the story and the film. In both, the plot follows the same scheme, it is set in Paris in the 1880’s, and all of the main characters are the same. The major difference that stood out to me is how these aspects are displayed at the beginning of the narrative.

The plot and the setting of book and movie are very similar. There was a lot of thins borrowed from the book, but there was a lot changed as well. The movie followed the plot of book very closely and portrayed the setting of the book very well. A lot of the dialogue was borrowed and spoken directly as it was in the book.

The book and movie are completely different. It 's like comparing apples and oranges. (I 'm assuming that you used the newest version with Guy Pierce). The biggest difference is probably the ommision of Haydee and Maximillien and Valentine (three of the main character) and the addition of Jacapo. Jacapo does is in the book, but he is never a large character.

The novel and the movie were both very suspenseful. The main characters are both the same in the book and in the movie but are a little bit different then their counter partners in the novel/movie. In both the movie and

Foremost, it is very recognizable that the overall flow of the story is same, but most of the plot events are not the same. Though, there were same events happening in both novel and the movie. For example, in both

When we saw the movie and the book and saw the movie, there were a couple of thing that they did not mention or did in the movie. In the movie they cut out some thing from the book. They did not really put everything they said in the book into the movie. They also did not really get some people personal feature. Here are something that were different from the movie, than what it said from the book.

The actor choices from the film compare to what the book envisioned, but also contrast. The character of Daisy is not similar in the film to what the book

There is an important scene at the start of the film that sets the plot for the audience that shows the significance of the film and the relationship between the characters. There isn’t much difference in the transition from the novel to the film, which helps the reader to understand the book better. Alistair MacLean’s writing is a page turning, cliff hanging style. The simple novel cover appealed to me and the interesting blurb

Behind every great movie, comes a storyline that is derived from a book however, most of the books to the movies have a great number of deviations. The screenwriters and other staff members to include the director come up with these deviations to enhance the plot in the attempt to make it a more interesting film to which in turn can make a better profit. The majority of differences that is found in films main objective is to enhance the mind. For example, when a scene has the ability to get a particular feeling out of a viewer, it is imperative to be able to understand the reasons for those feelings. The dialog and the visual effects of a scene sets a tone that differs from that of the book that it was taken from. Also, screen writers and

Soren Gordhamer once wrote on mashable.com, “...social media, likely more than anything else, has significantly impacted most of our daily lives.” However, social media would not have been so influential back when it did not exist. So what were the influences on the greatest people of the nineteenth century? French poet, novelist, and dramatist of the Romantic movement, Victor Marie Hugo is considered one of the greatest and most renowned French writers of all time, specifically for his innovative brand of Romanticism developed over the first decade of his career. Considering Hugo’s popularity amongst readers everywhere, it is not surprising that many sources can be found on Hugo and his works. Many of these sources focus specifically on Hugo’s most famous work: Les Misérables. Certainly, Victor Hugo’s Les Misérables was heavily influenced by people and events of the time period.

Throughout the film there are many notable alterations. Often in the case of films, there will be slight variations to the novels which is dependent on the different styles used. The party scene described in the book and shown in the movie differ. In both, the parties are large and grand, but the novel gives the feel of a party in the 1920's. In the movie, the parties are given a more modern day twist, with additions such as the rap and pop music heard in the movie.

HUGO IS CHARACTERIZED BY his unmoving resilience and sharp wit. There is rarely a situation where his peers would see him give up. He grasps onto the fringes of high society with the readiness to adapt—changing to the world around him. Despite being a youthful shifter, Hugo is wise beyond his years. He knows that he isn’t an invincible force to be reckoned with. Nor is he the smartest individual in the world. He understands that he can become emotional, make mistakes, and bleed. There are moments when he’ll recognize his limits and that is what sets him apart from the many. Hugo identifies his own faults and finds ways to work around them. Frankly, the shifter sees himself as a survivor. With that being said, his realistic views don’t always stop him from making stupid mistakes.

Hugo is the adventurous story of an orphaned boy that lives in a Paris train station. The main character is on a search to repair a broken automation. He pieces together stolen parts and collected info to bring his project to life. Immediately, the film reminds me of a wild goose chase, a treasure hunt, combined with an assortment of interesting characters. Like most main characters, they are often paired with other characters that add excitement and twists to the storyline. While falling in love with his idea to bring the automation to life, Hugo also falls for a young lady that he meets. Their union is puppy love at its finest. One may see him as a thief, while another might see him as a hopeless dreamer. But, I describe Hugo as an intelligent,