Human Enhancement : The Questionable Evolution For Humanity

Savulescu in "Genetic Interventions and the Ethics of Enhancement" suggests that we have an obligation to enhance. His core argument can be interpreted as threefold: The right thing to do to enhance, the consistency that comes with the enhancement, and there is no difference between enhancement and treating diseases.

of some sort to the general human gene pool, enough to be considered a different

Human evolution is the biological and cultural development of humans. A human is any member of the species Homo sapiens, meaning "wise man." Since at least the Upper Paleolithic era, some 40,000 years ago, every human society has devised a creation myth to explain how humans came to be. Creation myths are based on cultural beliefs that have been adopted as a legitimate explanation by a society as to where we came from.

The morality of genetic enhancement (GE) differs from person to person. The stance Michael J. Sandel’s takes is that eugenics and GE has no morality. He states in his work, “The case against Perfection”, that manipulating ones genes makes one less human; since, humans are not perfect which is what makes one human and by designing a perfect person one is taking away their humanity. He thinks eugenics are morally problematic in the cases of abortion; in which the mother would be free to determine if she would like to abort the baby by looking at its genes for illnesses, physical appearance and sex, this would test and even change ones moral values. Sandel is opposed on the quest of perfection due to the fact that one is not looking at the big picture, human life is a precious gift. He argues that one’s faults and quirks are what makes one unique from the other seven billion people on earth. And if one takes away what makes one who they are and becomes the perfect person there will be no originality since many would want to also become perfect. Imagine how many parents would want their child to become the next Einstein or Shakespeare. The freedom to become one’s own person would be taken away. For example, a boy that was GE to love soccer and no other sport and a boy that gets to pursue whatever he chooses, the other boy never had the opportunity or liberty to choose what sport he would like he was programed to love soccer for the rest of

The evolution of technology has been hand in hand with the human subjugation of earth, but the question persists, when does the use of technology go too far? Advances in medical science have increased the average human lifespan and improved the quality of life for individuals. Medical science and biology are steadily arriving at new ways to alter humans by the use of advanced genetic alteration. This technology gives rise to the question of how this new technology ought to be used, if at all. The idea of human enhancement is a very general topic, since humans are constantly “enhancing” themselves through the use of tools. In referring to human enhancement, I am referring specifically to the use of genetic intervention prior to

When you look at society today, it is plausible to say half of the population is affected by cancer or disease. Now based on the millions of people on this earth, this assumption is not one to be proud of. Day by day and year by year medical advancements have been in affect and so far helping decrease the number of deadly cases of disease. Recently researchers have made a major breakthrough in the field of medicine. Technology has become so advanced that physicians are able to detect disease present in genes inside a fetus before it is completely developed. Because they are now able to identify the gene, it brings up a whole new topic of altering specific genes upon our children to physically enhance them. In most cases, parents would choose to enhance these genes to have athletic or musically talented child. Now whether you think this is ethical or not is up to you however, I will be evaluating three articles on this topic and presenting the argument for each one.

1. What ethical issues are being debated in the podcast? The ethical issue being debated is selling organs. This podcast discusses all five sources of ethical standards utilitarian approach, rights approach, common good approach and virtue approach..

One of the most astonishing things on earth is the human body. They consist of many organs that work together to maintain the person alive. The humans body composition is complex, but what was the origin? How did we become who we are today? These are the questions that intrigued me, and allowed me to understand how the human body evolved over the years. By the examination of our ancestors, and our body we will understand how we look today.

Prosthetic limbs have been around for centuries, but what is one thing they all have in common? They have all been a nuisance. In recent years technology of the modern day Prosthesis has ventured to new heights, but they have not perfected an artificial limb yet. With the amount of people in need of prosthetic limbs, the demand for a perfect prosthesis is tremendous. The perfect prosthesis shouldn’t feel or even look like an artificial limb. Prosthetics should go unnoticed throughout the rest of the amputee’s life.

Within the last 100 years or so scientists have many valuable discoveries that have benefited mankind. These discoveries include the discovery of genes. Scientists have discovered what makes humans so unique from one another. However, with this newly gained knowledge of the function of genes comes the ability to alter or change them. Just imagine in the not so near future, you and your partner want to start a family together. You travel to your local gene councillor to pick the physical and characteristic traits of your child. That’s right. With the knowledge that has been gained about genes, scientists can “create” the perfect child genetically. The thought is scary. Nature has always taken us down the right path but are we really ready

Different ways of enhancing the human body have been used for decades in order to get a certain edge on other competitors. Pushing the human body can be a dangerous thing to do, but some competitors are willing to take this risk. On the contrary, the drugs that these competitors use to enhance their bodies can be the same drugs administered by doctors worldwide. Rules and regulations have been created to restrict and prohibit the use of many performance enhancers like steroids by different organizations such as the World Anti-Doping Agency and the International Olympic Committee. Organizations with the popularity and influence on sports, consult a large board of reliable health experts. Although the number of committees and organizations supporting

Some religious people are worried if implanting artificial organs into a human body is a form of playing God. Others are only concerned about the extremely high prices that could cause problems for low-income people. Amongst those apprehensions, people fear that scientists would soon use artificial organs for the sake of human enhancement (i.e: replacing bones with stronger, artificial ones). Also, if the treatment happens to fail, who would be held accountable for it? Would it be nobody or the surgeon? There is no correct way to answer how ethical artificial organs are. After all, how could one answer such a question full of different possible choices?

In a video about genetic engineering for human enhancement, on JasonRezaJorjani’s page, some of the possibilities of genetic engineering are listed along with how easy it is to clone humans. In the video it says, “Human cloning could happen now. All you need to do is spilt an embryo and freeze one of the identical twins and implant it. And some years later you’d have two genetically identical individuals of different ages.” and that is a scary reality knowing that people able to change human nature itself, in order get ahead in life, remake themselves so that they can be more ideal, or even clone themselves so they can have “eternal life”. All of these things unnatural and wrong and even adds an unfair advantage to those that are already ahead

There are many advantages and disadvantages to having a metal prosthetic limb. Although the metal has amazing durability, it costs a lot to build, and weighs significantly more than any plastic. To have a 3D-printed metal prosthetic limb it takes a larger and more advanced mechanical and technological 3D-printer. The 3D-printing using metal components requires specialized equipment and a component cannot easily be corrected. A metal prosthetic is not the best route for most circumstances.

Human evolution according to research started over 6 million years ago. The outcome of the evolution process is the current human beings. Scientific studies have revealed over the years a remarkable affinity between the chimpanzees/Apes and human beings. Even though this reality is not a definitive prove that human beings evolved from apes, it does show that the human beings are in one way or another related to other primates. Scientists suppose that the humans and the primates shared a common ancestor. The subject of what makes humans what they are and their origin has been the exclusive purpose leading to many scientific studies globally (Coolidge & Wynn, 2011). Studies believe that Africa was the origin of evolution millions of years ago. Fossil remains have been discovered in different parts of Africa as well as other regions of the world. Different hominins have been discovered around the world in the last 1 million years. Thus, the different discoveries have led to comparisons between the various species of hominins to clarify on their similarities as well as differences. This essay seeks to explain whether they were distinctively different species or regional versions of the same species.