Essay on Human In Vitro Testing

The Draize Irritation Test is another type of test that a cosmetics companies should not use in the cosmetic industry. Michael Balls explained how the Draize rabbit skin irritation test is used in Alternatives to Animal Testing, “the skin is often exposed, either intentionally or unintentionally, and therefore a risk assessment regarding the potential cause to irritation of the skin is before marketing”(Balls et al. 103). During the Draize test, rabbits are immobilized, the test substance is put

Animal Testing: Necessary Procedure or Outdated Experiment? Picture yourself applying your favorite make-up or taking medicine prescribed to you by your doctor, and ask yourself, how do you know its safe? Have you ever wondered what goes in to make sure that makeup or medicine isn’t lethal? A majority of making sure if things like drugs and make-up are safe is done by testing the drugs and cosmetics on different kinds of animals (Abbott 1). Animal testing once saved many lives (“Animal”, par.7)

Alternatives in animal testing has been a huge controversial debate around the world for years. Many researchers and scientists try to stray away from the term “alternatives” because to them, it suggests that no animals whatsoever can be completely replaced. 1 The CAAT, the Center for Alternatives to Animal Testing, is based on the principles of the ‘3Rs’: replacement, reduction, and refinement. Replacement basically means the way it sounds, the animals are replaced by other methods not involving

For centuries humans have dedicated their time and research to animal experimentation. A large number of these animals are being utilized and taken from their homes involuntarily. They are abused, mishandled and harmed for our own benefit to create products such as cosmetic supplies, vaccines, and medication. Without a doubt, these animals are in pain. They whimper out of fear and struggle to survive in the conditions they are forced to undergo. Many of them are even put into isolation and sedated

isn’t lethal? A majority of ensuring items such as medicine and cosmetics are safe to use is done by testing the medicine and cosmetics on a multitude of different kinds of animals (Abbott 1). Animal testing saved many lives in the past (“Animal”, par.7) but as science bred new methods, much like in vitro, which uses human cells cultivated in a lab, the potential for a replacement to animal testing arose (Abbott 1). Whether or not one is more effective than the other has been a hot topic for years

Animal testing has been practiced since the early 1920s. Animal research is used to ensure the safety of a product before it reaches the general public.These products can range from vaccinations, to the soap in your bathroom. Science has evolved drastically since the 1920s and with that evolvement there are now more cost-effective and relevant alternatives to experimentation that no longer call for the suffering of animals, and do not interfere with animal rights. Animals are entitled to their

of animal testing probably evokes images of animals being viciously injected or force fed pills. This is because it is the reality of what animal testing has been for the previous decades. Testing on animals for the benefit of humans is cruel and hurtful to the animals being tested upon. Animals feel the same level of pain that a human does, so why does it make it okay to test unknown substances on a lab rat just because it is smaller and weaker?  In recent years potential animal testing alternatives

rabbits, and monkeys, are being subjected to animal testing on products that could potential benefit a person’s complexion. Such animals are often chosen, because their DNA is genetically very similar to humans, and thus could be used for testing. The extensive procedures to testing various merchandises could potentially harm the animals during the process, because there are multiple trials to see whether or not the product is safe to use on humans. Of these trials, many animals suffer from intensive

toxicological testing data, the data often do not include assessment on reproductive and developmental

injuries in humans (Becker). Often times, scientists perform procedures on animals and take those results, to then attempt to connect the results to humans, in order to better understand how the human body operates. Although it is very important, some do not believe that animal experimentation is vital in medical research. Because animal experimentation has extensive benefits to humans, the procedures that scientists perform for medical treatments should continue to be used, and testing on household