Human Interaction Utilizing A Comparative Frame Work

The beauty of creativity is that it is abstract, yet ubiquitous: in art, music or how one decides to compose an essay. However, creativity has recently been declining among the human population. According to an article, named, “The Creativity Crisis,” by Newsweek.com in July 2010, authors, Po Bronson and Ashley Merryman, state, “the Torrance Test … indicates that the public’s “creativity quotient” has steadily crept downward since 1990” (Prompt 1). Bronson and Merryman report that the test, which evaluates one’s creativity, had been dispensed to myriads of people across the globe, and have concluded that creativity has been slowly diminishing. Kyung Hee Kim, professor at the College of William and Mary, also comments that this is most prevalent and grave among students from kindergarten through sixth grade (Prompt 1). Consequently, society, or in this case, the world fears that current students and future generations will not be nourished with the creativity required to thrive as individuals, affecting the world as a whole. Ultimately, this poses the question whether a creative thinking class, which solely focuses on the education of creativity, should be taught in the school. This school should impose a creative thinking class, due to the fact creativity is a vital element for the future and is the solution to the creative crisis.

In the context of creativity’s stated definition, we will proceed to group our arguments into three themes of factors: cognitive ability, expertise training, and environmental conditions. The human brain is highly adaptable and can continue to develop new cognitive abilities, even past adulthood (Norman, 2015). Proper cognitive expertise and training can help workers produce and operate in ingenious ways (Ginamarie, Lertiz & Mumford, 2004). Finally, the working environment can both motivate or stifle creative output. Managers can influence all three components: expertise, thinking skills, and motivation (Amabile, 1998).

In Creativity on the Brink the Arthur, Arlane Starko, explains of his trip to china. While there he encountered many questions from fellow educators that all asked the same question, how to teach creativity. The areas that he visited were known for having very high test scores, but the educators knew that high test scores won’t be enough to help in the future. The Chinese are masters of test taking yet their creativity level is almost nonexistent. China has become the example that Yong Zhao points out, “every choice we make about

S. I. Hayakawa wrote and published an article named "What lt Means to Be Creative". This article challenged how a creative person could be defined and identified. In Hayakawa’s essay he presents several points of view an individual could be characterized as being creative. His writing forces you to contemplate on how a person’s aptitudes are categorized. Hayakawa tests your ability to be opened minded and makes you visualize how a person could be described as a creative individual but may discredited themselves due to society’s standard of this word. After reading his writing, I believe I can summarize his analogy.

Creativity is often more about the process rather than the end project, it is useful for many reasons:

Boon, R 1997 Cultural creativity: the importance of creativity in organizational and educational contexts [s.l.] : [s.n.], viewed 18 April, 2012, via eReserve

Creativity within relationships is vital for a seemingly healthy relationship. Creativity is ‘often associated with imagination and inspiration in the arts.. also vital for problem solving and development of new ideas’ (Taylor and Turner 2016a). Psychologist’s see creativity important because of it’s economic and cultural importance; Mihaly Csikszentmihaly suggested that ‘being creative involves a state of concentration and total involvement’ (Csikszentmihalyi, cited in Taylor and Turner 2016). Some psychologists assume that creativity is a characteristic only few hold, where as it is now argued that anybody can be creative given the right pathway. Taylor and Turner have split creativity into three frameworks; creative contexts, creative collaboration’s and creative groups and cultures.

Recent theoretical and empirical developments in psychology have brought the field to the point where researchers need to be mindful of the generalizability of Western findings to other cultural contexts (Heine & Norenzayan, 2006). Another shortcoming of psychological research is the majority of most influential research giving focus to comparisons of North Americans and East Asians. It is perhaps logical that North Americans specifically and Westerners more generally have usually served as the point of comparison in these studies, due to the majority of psychological theories did in fact arise from such samples. Nevertheless, this ought not to be the case. Heine and Norenzayan (2006) calls for cultural psychological research to go beyond only comparisons of East Asians nations with Western nations. At present, despite the growth of cross-cultural research, very little is known about the psychological processes of the majority of cultures of the world. Another shortcoming of psychological research is that it has largely been limited to explorations of the extent to which concepts and occurrences that have been developed and identified in the West generalize to non-Western cultures.

The conclusions derived from the researches help the argument that creativity requires both masculine and feminine components. Bem notes that “people with access to both masculine and feminine abilities or qualities also might have access to several strategies when confronted with various problems” (Jonsson and Carlsson, p. 273). The traditional masculinity is often associated with being rational, strong, and independent while the traditional femininity is associated with being emotional, sensuous, and imaginative. Combining those traits helps one to think of various strategies in a given problem. Runco articulates gender and strategies:

The term creativity is used for the purpose of describing the ability that is concerned with the process of creating something new or valuable. This ability allows a person to surpass the rules, practices, methods, forms or similar kind of activities that the traditional society may be performing at that time. Creativity is one of the most important things that have allowed the people of the society to move forward and urge for development. All the development that has been made in various aspects of human life can be directly connected with the creativity. All the industry leaders of the world have secured this place because of the level of creativity and innovation that they showed. They used this creativity for creating something new that has allowed them to develop completely new methods for this purpose.

As I plan to become a Forensic Psychologist and primarily work as a profiler, different cultures could directly affect my analysis of any specific individual and their behavioral patterns. Because different cultures promote unique behavioral traits and social routined, acknowledging and understanding these distinctions could become key to properly resolving the case at hand. Although certain behaviors, such as facial expressions and some body positions, are universal and extend throughout most cultures, the slight differences in behavioral normalities greatly changes the overall appearance and personality of an individual. As a result, understanding and applying specific cultural norms would increase the chances of success in my chosen career

Culture is fundamental to understanding human experience. It makes the world inspiring, entertaining, enables effective communication, and influences most factors of modern life, so it’s no surprise that psychologists are interested in the impact it has. Sociocultural psychology and cross- cultural psychology are two different approaches that explore cultural experience. The two disciplines, though different in their definitions of cultural impact, share many of the same goals and ideas, and can arguably offer great insight to the other approach. The potential for collaboration between the two disciplines to garner a rich insight into personal and social cultural influence means that the two approaches are by no means incompatible, and their compatibility can offer a wealth of positive contribution to psychological research.

One of the most important cognitive skills is the ability to solve problems. It is manifested through the capability to find solutions to complex issues. By comparing two theories of child development, namely, the Piaget 's approach to cognitive development and Vygotsky 's social constructivist perspective, it will become clear that the nature of epistemological beliefs held by teachers might influence the development of children. This in turn suggests that problem-solving abilities in children can be influenced and improved by contextual factors. The similar pattern of influence has been observed in research on creativity in adults which have demonstrated that the context in which the individual is placed in improves one 's creative processes. If we assume that the problem-solving ability depends, at least partially, on finding novel solutions to complex issues, creativity would play a key role in finding such solutions and thus, can be improved by the contextual factors. On another hand, there are certain factors such as individual differences and cultural background which play an important role in creative processes. Personality type is usually quite stable throughout the lifetime and thus, difficult to change by changing the context. Traits such as openness or schizotypy has been found to correlate with creativity thus acting against the idea that creativity can be improved by mere contextual changes. By describing the evidence for and against the notion that

Undoubtedly the practice of innovation and creativity has started back years ago, before the advent of globalization, through which scientists, doctors, physicians, authors and philosophers came up with innovative and creative ideas, solutions and new items etc…

According to the ethnographic approach defined by Papen and Tusting (2006, p.312-359), creativity refers the production of something ‘new’ and ‘original’. In written language, creativeness should not be perceived as a decontextualised, individual activity or as being entirely shaped by context. It should be seen as being dependent on and emergent from the creative literacy practices through which texts are constructed because they are shaped by people, who in pursuit of their own