Human Nature And Nature

Human beings are part of the animal kingdom, and therefore part of nature. If that is true, then everything they create or destroy is by default "natural". I agree with the statement.

Many researchers have tested the theory that humans are naturally war-loving. A fair viewpoint, from the article “Evolutionary Life”, is that “human nature is not one thing, neither 'good' nor 'bad' overall. People in general have been genetically endowed by evolution with a wide variety of tendencies and capacities that respond to -- but are not necessarily controlled or determined by -- their environment" (Atlee). With this, it’s fair to draw a line between how humans were “made” to act and how they act today. In the earliest stages of human life through the present, humans have fought, hunted, and killed their way through life. Today’s difference to the past is not much different besides the means we use to go about the deeds. Businessmen, politicians, and numerous other professions utilize harmful tactics in order to get what they desire. For example, a politician exposes the underlying “evils” of another candidate in order to gain votes, much like how the infamous Salem Witch Trials were pursued in the late seventeenth century when others cried witch in order to avoid being tortured and killed themselves. While one may argue that cavemen were, in some aspects, biologically different than we are today and that they were not exposed to as much as we are, one cannot argue that we are not still instinctively caveman-like. We hunt and gather food; we create new and improved ways of killing enemies or food source; and when we don’t like how or what someone else is

In Young Goodman Brown and Other Short Stories, Nathaniel Hawthorne develops his characters based on the belief that all humans were evil beings. From this, his view of human nature is revealed: all humans are immoral because of their sins. Though he created these personas through this idea, he also leaves them with a bit of humanity. In a way, Hawthorne presents many of his characters with the same traits said by an English novelist and author, Graham Greene: “Goodness has only found a perfect incarnation in a human body and never will again, but evil can always find a home there. Human nature is not black and white but black and gray.” Human will only show temporary acts of kindness because of a person’s natural tendency to sin. As a result of these actions, no one can achieve the title of being “white,” or truly pure and innocent. Overall, from the perspective of both authors, human nature is often viewed as “black,” or evil and “gray,” or a combination of good and evil.

The concept of human nature focuses on the distinctive natural characteristics of humans, namely the ways we feel, think and act, regardless of external forces as well as influences. Within the study and discipline of Philosophy, this fundamental nature of humans and our existence is scrutinized. Philosophy involves a continuous search and lookout for an accurate understanding of the underlying traits of humankind that are deemed to be common among all humans. Starting with the ancient philosophers and ending with the contemporary thinkers, a bridge of suppositions that seemingly define human nature has been established, despite the fact that there are vital differences. Numerous conjectures and theories have been put forward by

unable to define a simple term like human nature? Over the course of history, many important philosophers and scholars, while trying to define human nature, have come up with theories that have helped shape the way countries are governed and led. Psychologists and philosophers have taken different sides when it comes to determining what kind of intentions humans are naturally born with. Are humans inherently born evil or good? People have used philosophy, religion, and even science to find the answer to this question. There are valuable arguments that have been made from people who think humans are born inherently good, and from people who think humans are born inherently bad. Another belief is that humans are born inherently good, and then due to civilization, humans turn bad. Human nature is a debate that could go on without end, however, is worth researching about.

The will, in its simplest form, is the ability for one to control one’s own actions. Through the will, the morality of the action is entirely decided by the doer. Augustine professes the will simply permits the doer to do evil. In Socrates’ assertion, free will is contingent on self-control because without it, one can find oneself enslaved to a material thing or desire. Based on reading and prior knowledge, it can be deduced that the only thing that can truly keep one from vice is free will.

The brain is believed to involve two different views of human nature, the first states that it is a flexible organ that adapts in order to gain new information. The second view indicates that the it is formed by evolution in order to learn to perform different functions (Splleke, 2007) This essay will aim to understand these views by discussing and comparing Spllekes (2007) ‘core knowledge’ theory, and Gopniks (2004) ‘The scientist in the crib’ theory, the two main modern approaches to developmental cognitive psychology.

By observing and analyzing the context of previous time periods, anthropology was certainly not created by accident or mistake. At the end of the 18th century, the Enlightenment period was occurring. This produced two products during the time period. First, humans were able to possess a newfound understanding of general principals in which the world works. They wanted to know all about universal human nature, such as why all human beings are alike. Secondly, out of the Enlightenment, we have an intellectual ability to understand the world through science. Defined, science is an empirical methodology in which accurate descriptive data is logically analyzed, resulting in defensible, logical conclusions. The dilemma with answering the

Human nature is complicated. In our everyday society, it is not hard to see people hurt each other due to various reasons. Reminiscing history, genocide is perhaps one of the worst and tragic outcome of people hurting one another. In order to look at why people hurt each other and how genocide happens, we need to understand it from social psychologist perspective by analyzing methodology, person and the situation, subjective experience and application of the above issue.

An author, introduced as a phycologist has revealed that human nature is unique and are easily influenced by each other which help them to shape and built social practices, to create different ambience to follow belief as well as to have suggestibility which can induce a normal person. Human beings are not only effected by other’s behaviour but also by all those social sciences which have been observed and been practised. As a citizen, an individual should focus on their study to show themselves as the best human being from their role on the society and their contribution for the place where they live in.

The features of what it means to be human and the fundamentals of human behaviour and reasoning are things that have been heavily debated and considered across generations and cultures. Although there is no real answer to the question of the definition of human nature or proof of its existence at all, every individual’s idea of it is slightly different and is greatly influenced by the things that they are surrounded by. In my eyes, the idea of human nature involves the intrinsic characteristics of the human person, or the things that truly make a human a human and not any other animal. Though humans are similar at a physical level, human nature is almost like the criteria for building a human soul or a human spirit - it goes beyond what is

Humanitarian behavior and attitude towards the appearance and the perspective through which they understand things differs from one individual to another. These impacts can be characterized by psychological nature of an individual, current situation in nature, the physical appearance of a person, incapability amongst others. Such factors act majorly and determine a lot on how people behave and think towards each other. This scenario makes it hard for an individual to examine his/her own life but rather criticize those of others. They tend to see another individual as being incomplete therefore need to be reformed. In Nathaniel Hawthorne’s “The Birthmark”, he argues that in his article, if there were ways and mechanism to create a perfect human then that would be done without delay.

Man kinds biggest question in life is about our purpose and place on earth. Human civilizations throughout time have struggled with understanding nature and society’s purposes in nature, which often stems from responsibility, coexistence, and population control concerns for humanity as well as animal kind. Several wolf species have faced persecution and sever lost of habitat because of humans. Man kind’s treatment of varying wolf species clearly stems from people’s attempt to balance responsibility, coexistence, and population control, but failing miserably. However, human civilizations recently begun to intensely attempt to be responsible with nature, coexist with other inhabitants of nature, and ethical population control for animals with the use of education and advancements in technology. Human civilization’s technologies have a purpose and place on earth in which humanity is morally and ethically responsible for the environment and animals of Earth that require coexistence and ethical population control intervention from mankind.

Human Nature, the basics of character in every human being, morals which are not all good and not all bad, but somewhat in the middle. This arises from English author James P. Pinkerton in, “Absolute Power Corrupts Absolutely” when he describes the malevolent morality of humans. David Brooks, author of “Conservatism and Evolution” opens the idea of good nature. All of which is followed by British author William Golding in “Lord of the Flies” showing a happy medium of all.

Natural selection is a cornerstone of the theory of evolution, although many experts would agree that it is no longer viewed the same way that natural selection was originally theorized. Ultimately, it’s the concept of phenotypic differences in various living organisms determining (to a very debatable extent) which organisms survive and reproduce. For most living organisms on this planet, the proliferation of human existence has greatly impacted the scheme of natural selection however. Human beings pollute exponentially more than any other species on the planet and significantly change virtually every environment in the world gradually; consequently, the rules of natural selection for most of the world are determined by human existence itself.