Javert Quotes

Jean-Jacques Rousseau was a philosopher, writer, and composer born in 1712 who believed in that a government should be run by the people and citizens , who are equals, and not a small group of the powerful and rich. He has many qualities; including being optimistic, idealistic, talented, creative, and faithful. Rousseau is an optimist and is positive because he believes that humans are inherently good and that they will work together and make the best decisions for everybody and how communities should operate. On the other hand, Rousseau could be considered Idealistic because of his views. The philosophy that people are naturally good and will work together to make the right decisions can be considered very unrealistic and a romanticized

Here are my thoughts on if human nature is naturally good or bad. My first point is that i believe human nature is inherently good. Also, one reason for this is that humans will depend on others to progress and produce in society, therefore humans should always try to be good to each other. In Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde it says “his friendships seemed to be founded in good nature”.

Good versus Evil is an important concept. Evil sometimes overcomes our good but never exceeds good. The difference between evil and good is that good is an ability to have empathy and compassion towards other people. Evil is people who are selfish, self-absorbed and don’t have empathy towards others. Literature plays a vital role in developing concepts of good and evil and effectively portrays the morals of its time period. In the novels Dracula and The Strange Case of Dr.Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, the authors explore the human nature of good and evil in men from different perspectives of Dracula, Mr. Hyde and Dr. Jekyll.

A straightforward question. Are humans naturally good or evil? A simple question that has many of different answers and a question that may require deep thinking. For me, both sides I was drawn to. My household is christian, so I thought of the religious answer, but I also thought that people are born good and their environment and decisions can cause them to be evil. This is what I came up with.

For centuries many philosophers, as well as most individuals, have pondered on the question what is good and what is evil. More-so philosophers of all ages have also stumbled upon a more in depth question which is if the intuitive knowledge of man's nature is good, or if it is evil. Many have claimed to have an answer to these puzzling questions yet most of their answers were found to be incomplete and inadequate at a later date. Religion also tried to provide a solution but to my understanding only caused more of an entanglement if anything.

In Genesis the word of God leads humanity in the direction of self preservation, urging them to procreate, to ”Be fruitful and multiply” (Genesis 9:1), and to minimize hostility and violence among people. As Freud asserted, “Besides the instinct to preserve living substance and join it into ever larger units, there must exist another, contrary instinct seeking to dissolve those units and bring them back to their primeval, inorganic state” (Freud 77). Genesis exemplifies the struggle between the two opposing human instincts, with God acting as a moderator between them. Forms of justice are put into place in an attempt to control these drives, one example being the proclamation that “Whoever sheds the blood of a human, by a human shall that person’s blood be shed” (Genesis 9:6). The ethics and laws that develop throughout Genesis seek to “prevent the crudest excesses of brutal violence” but are unable to control “the more cautious and refined manifestations of human aggressiveness” (Freud 70). Since they cannot be completely eradicated, the scriptures instead play into the more negative aspects of human nature, especially narcissism, and manipulate them into a force for conservation rather than annihilation.

Human nature by essence has been the cause of many entrepreneurial paths, all follow to known the essence itself behind of what we conceive as life. Moreover it’s righteous description and abstract content, that many great man has humbly studied and that for centuries have made a path closely enough to the understanding of it, yet far from the light, it seems to be and unsolvable question that gives us a “Raison d'être” to our existence in this world.

Thanks Alicia, I appreciate your thoughtful and informative response to my post. I'm sorry if you found the term “mid level provider” offensive. I honestly, hadn't viewed the term as derogatory until you shed light on the origin and true meaning. I also, believe most people are inherently good, however as you stated there are those few that discredit this notion. Yes, I have dealt with situations in my nursing career that made me question another individual’s integrity. I have no issue confronting another provider or peer if I discovered unsafe or unethical practices within the

While standing over the recently departed body of his inventor, Victor Frankenstein’s creature reflects that he “had cast off all feeling, subdued all anguish, to riot in the excess of [his] despair.” The creature uses his anger to dispel the pain of his rejection from society to purge himself of morals, finishing that “evil thenceforth became [his] good” (220). What constitutes “good” and “evil” for the creature, however, is rather hazy, and what constitutes good and evil for the rest of humanity is even less clear. Nonetheless, through Frankenstein, Mary Shelley implies that humans are predisposed to strive for goodness, which is defined by health and compassion, but that despite this, humans are inclined to act in self-interest.

Victor Hugo’s works discuss many themes; forgiveness and compassion, justice, and the need for political change, among many others, and much of the time, adhering to these themes take precedence over obeying the law. Hugo was elected to the Parliament in 1848 as a conservative, yet when he started making progressive speeches, was forced to break with the conservatives. It was when Napoleon III came into power that Hugo stood up for his views, declaring Napoleon III a traitor to France, and was exiled from France for nineteen years for this. Hugo’s sense of morality defied law; he refused to obey and paid the price for it. Hugo continued to publish novels and anti-Napoleon III material while he was in exile in Guernsey. Some of Hugo’s most powerful

My philosopher is, Jean Jacques Rousseau, his life was pretty simple, He was a political theorist, (one who forms an explanation or theory on a subject based on careful study) A philosopher, (seeker of wisdom) and a composer, (writer of music) his childhood kind of sucked, his mother died, his father fled the country to avoid imprisonment, and his job sucked. once he got older his life got better he wrote two operas and wrote a book. from then on he become more and more well known.

Humanity is interesting in that humans can be evil or good. Examples can be seen in the news, which tells of the kindness of strangers, but also tell of the merciless slaughtering of innocent people. This leads to the question that many ponder, is human nature inherently good or bad? Human nature is bad, and the main elements of human nature include selfishness, cowardice, and violence.

a question that has been asked since the writing of Confucius’ Analects. Are human beings inherently good through human nature? Or are people selfish beings who solely rely on others and require a good amount of law, order, and social expectations. The well known Chinese philosopher by the name of Hsun Tzu worked as a teacher and architect of Confucius philosophy.

Whether human beings are instinctually good or evil in an elementary natural state is a question that has been boggling the minds of even the greatest philosophers. There is a spectrum of theories that support both good and evil within the human race, each with valid points that explains the range of our interests, being either for ourselves or for others. However, my personal stance is the sensible theory of Altruism. Past experiences and observations allow me to take the stance, and support the argument that humans are caring and genuinely good individuals and have the will and desire to help those around them.

In his novel, Les Miserables, Victor Hugo identifies the principle social evils of French society through the actions and qualities of his characters. By depicting each of his characters’ struggles through destitute and oppressed measures, Hugo is able to identify the social errors of 19th century France. The fact that characters such as Valjean, Javert, Fantine, and Cosette, attempt to rise above poverty and redeem themselves indicate that such inequalities did, and still do, exist to this day. Through the use of feminist ideals and the criminal injustice system, Hugo attacks the principle social evils that each of his characters face in Les Miserables.