Human Resource Management | | |
* Historical perspective of Human Resource Management – From personnel management to Human Resources Management * Human Resource Management and Social Justice for Welfarism * Human Resource Management and Bureaucracy * Human Resource Management and Union-Negotiation * Human Resource Management and Organization * Human Resource Management Perspective
A) Historical perspective of Human Resource Management – From personnel management to Human Resources Management
Human resource management has changed in name various times throughout history. The name change was mainly due to the change in social and economic activities throughout history.
Torrington et al identify six
…show more content…
Human resource management is the basis of all management activity. Management is about effective utilization of the organization’s people to make things happen in a productive and efficient way so that the organization prospers and the people thrive.
Managing people is a complicated field of activity which requires the application of a wide range of knowledge and skill. It is a well known fact that committed employees are key factors in a company’s development and economic success. Torrington (2005) proposed the following evolutionary stages for the development of human resource management: * Social Justice: In the late 19th and 20th century, some large employers began to appoint welfare officers to manage new initiatives designed to make life less harsh for their employees. The results were higher productivity, improved retention of the work force and a bigger pool of applicants for each job. The more obvious welfare initiatives promoted by employers today include employee assistance schemes, child care facilities and health screening programmes. * Human bureaucracy: This marked the beginning of a move away from a sole focus on welfare towards meeting various other organizational objectives.
C) Human Resource Management and Bureaucracy
Two contrasting human resource management models, bureaucratic and strategic, are represented by polar configurations of the
Human resources management was defined as ‘a strategic, integrated and coherent approach to the employment, development and well-being of the people working in organizations’ by Boxall and Purcell (2003). Noon, 1992 (as cited in Armstrong, 2014 a, p6) drew ‘doubts of whether HRM was a map, a model or a theory. But it is evident that the original concept could be seen as a philosophy’. The human
The history of human resources goes all the way back to the early 1900s. While human resources management was on the rise, new positions in the field were created. Various types of specialists were created during this time.
The need for human resources evolved as a reaction to the authoritarian structure of the classical organizational theory. Neoclassical addressed many of the problems inherent in classical theory. The most serious objections to classical theory are that
Prior to the elaboration of the Thesis topic, it is necessary to explain the Human Resources Management is. There is no common definition by scholars, therefore we are not providing one single definition, but we will rely on the book of Torrington et al. on his explanation of the term Human Resources Management. According to them, this divergence is due to the fact that HR is commonly used in two ways. On the one hand HR is used to describe the body of management activities covered in books such as this. In this way HRM is really no more than a more modern and supposedly imposing name for what was long labelled ‘personnel management. (Torrington et al. 2011). On the other hand the term denotes a particular approach to the management of people which is clearly distinct from ‘personnel management’. Used in this way HRM signifies more than an updating of the label; it also suggests a distinctive
In conclusion, Human resource management is the advanced version of Personnel management. Human resource management basically deals with developing Personnel management skills. It is Human resource management that develops a team of employees for an organisation.
Human Resource Management as a concept was formalised in the USA in the late 1970s and early 1980s, encapsulated in two famous textbooks (Beer et al. 1985; Fombrun et al. 1984). These approaches varied but both differentiated HRM from personnel management and argued that the former involved more integration of personnel policies across functions and with the corporate strategy (with HR being the downstream function); a greater role for line managers; a shift from collective to individual relationships; and an accent on enhancing company performance.
This article discusses the foundations of the modern human resources department and covers the three historical periods of development to where modern human resources has evolved. There are three main historical periods that are discussed including - pre-industrial, bureaucratic, and high performance. All three of these periods have played a vital role in the field of Human Resources. The pre-industrial period ended with the revolutionary war. This time period saw a lack of human resource management due to “inequality, inflexibility and misalignment that would be unimaginable today.” Slavery and indentured servitude were common throughout the American colonies and the only means to learn a trade were through apprenticeships which
The perspective on managing human resources in any organizational structure that I have today writing this essay is far more different from what I thought it was before I took up this subject. Human resource is a very intriguing concept that today carries utmost importance in maintaining a healthy work culture. All through the various readings in the course work not limiting to 2.1 to 2.7 project the importance of human resource management in a wide spectrum. Man, has evolved into a superior being in the ecological niche because of the ability to think, emote and analyze that sets us apart from rest of the species. These very characters in my opinion form grounds to learn on how to manage our own selves or
Human Resource Management is a practice of bringing people and organizations together so that the goals of each are met. It is the part of the management practices which is concerned with the management of human resources is an organization. It tries to secure the best from people by winning their whole hearted co –operation. It may be defined as “the art of procuring, developing and maintaining competent work force to achieve the goals of an organization in an effective and efficient manner. “
Human Resources can find it roots by looking no further than the purchasing department. From the beginning, hiring and firing people, the traditional core of Human Resources functions, was done by the purchasing agent. The thinking behind this was that purchasing agents procured the land, equipment, materials, and as a extension of this the people to ensure proper functioning of the business. To an extent of this attitude that people where to be purchased, unions arouse to protect the interest of the worker. To negotiate with the unions, companies adapted by having their own representatives, giving rise to the labor relations function within HR.
Due to that finding, as (Nkomo, S., 1988) noted, a significant amount of attention had now been taken to the strategic aspect of human resources, as it has been regarded as a way to link organisational goals and strategies to the human resource objectives and programmes. (Lengnick-Hall, C. & Lengnick-Hall, M., 1988) confirms this by stating ‘achieving competitive advantage through human resources requires that these activities be managed from a strategic perspective.’ It can be concluded that it was at that
Human Resource Management (HRM) is fundamentally another name for personnel management. It is the process of making sure the employees are as creative as they can be. HRM is a way of grouping the range of activities associated with managing people that are variously categorised under employee relations, industrial/labour relations, personnel management and organisational behaviour. Many academic
Human resource management entails the management of the people working in an organization. These are the people who are entrusted to help meet the organizations objectives. They start from the lowest level employees to the top management. Human resource management therefore, encompasses the entire workforce who help to uplift and grow the company into the great multinational corporations they are from their inception to date. The significance of the human resources in organizations has become more evident over the years as more managers discover the relationship between organizational performance and employee retention and satisfaction. Therefore, they must strive to gain the best employees to represent their interests in the market. People who will work together to meet the organizations objectives and people who will make the organization have a competitive advantage over all others in the market. The human resources approach to management emphasizes the importance of human capital in the organization. This paper describes the role of human resource management in an organization. It also analyses the differences between personnel management and human resource management as well as the phases of human resource planning. The second part of the paper analyses the factors involved in the recruitment of employees, and factors pertaining to employee payment, job evaluation and cessation of employment. The third part of the paper focusses on employee motivation and the
Prior to World War II, Human Resources, often called Personnel or Human Relations, served a primarily administrative purpose. Tasked with operational duties of hiring and training employees and bookkeeping responsibilities regarding payroll and benefits, human resource managers often reported directly to line managers (Groysberg, McLean, & Reavis, 2006, pp. 1-2). In addition to administrative duties, human resources assumed bureaucratic and operational roles as well. Bureaucratic management involves drafting and implementing policies that affect the workforce. Human resource managers use
In the 21st century, human society has undergone tremendous changes, it began to change from the industrial economy to a knowledge economy era. Economic globalization and improve the level of global competition, organizations have had to make full use of all their resources to ensure its survival and development. As an important resource organization human resource organization also attracted more and more attention. Effective human resource management has become a key organizational development and success. In 1991, the United States, IBM and Tower Perrin consulting firm jointly nearly 3,000 senior human resources manager and chief executive officer (CEO) were investigated. As a result, 70% of the human resource management as organizational success the key, more than 90 percent expect to HR 2000 will be an important sector enterprises. In the field of management, human resources management has become an important subject, which also attracted more and more attention to academics. After we determine the human resource management and its importance must be accompanied by the development of the history of today 's human resource management theory and practice to do a retrospective, which recognize the role of human resource management and organizational development of its profound significance. This chapter of human resources management, the predecessor of personnel management history dates back to explain the emergence and evolution of human resource management