Homework Assignment Covering Chapters 1 thru 3 Part 1 – Environment of Human Resource Management Chapter #1: Human Resources Management in Organizations Case HR, Culture, and Business Results Success at Google, Scripps, and UPS Question : How does the integration of HR with the organizational culture contribute to the success of Google, Scripps, and UPS? To find ideas, go to the corporate website for each of these companies and search for additional insights. (I’ve provided answers to this question for you to get an understanding what I’m looking for when grading your answers. You don’t need to answer this question! It’s an example for you to follow on answering the other homework …show more content…
The Occupational Health and Safety Administration also known as OSHA is the primary agencies which enforce labor and safety laws that basically ensures that all employers will provide a safe working place and provide workers with all PPE (personal protective equipment) to do their jobs. Chapter #3: Equal Employment Opportunity Case Religious Accommodation? Question #3: What is the legal basis for the EEOC to hold that JBS-SWIFT had violated the employee’ civil rights? The EEOC determined that JBS-SWIFT had violated the employee’s civil rights of those Somali Muslims it employed by displaying patterns and acts of discrimination, which included harassment and a hostile working environment. Additionally, SWIFT disallowed religious accommodations such as prayer time that resulted in a walked out when told they could not break for a certain prayer time of the day. Chapter #3: Equal Employment Opportunity Contract the solutions to the Tyson situation and the SWIFT situation. Question #4: Which is likely to have the greatest positive impact on the company and why? Tyson’s quest to better the situation to accommodate the Muslim’s religious holiday was to ensure that all its employee were satisfied and there was no favoritism being displayed to either a person religion. By doing this company added a “personal holiday” which a person can use freely to accommodate a persons birthday, or a special religious day such
In “Working it Out” by Diana Eck, she writes about religious oppression in the workplace. The examples she gives on the many ways people have been fired, or the ways in which people's faiths have been compromised, reiterates that the amendment that states freedom of religion in the United States, is
In this particular case, Mr. Maalick received very clear and convincing racial and religious discrimination from both his supervisor and from his co-workers. The employees of Treton blatantly violated the Civil Rights Act and the Equal. Employment. Opportunity Commission. These acts do not allow, under any circumstances, discrimination based on the idea of race, color, sex, religion or age (The Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission | National Archives, n.d.).
Federal law and corporate governance prohibit discrimination and harassment, and Maalick, a minority with a unique religion, encountered inappropriate behaviors in the workplace. It is clear that the Treton office in Chenworth, Kansas had a prolonged atmosphere of ridicule, mistreatment, racial harassment, and religious discrimination. Contrary to protections afforded in Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, office personnel openly displayed inappropriate workplace behaviors and defied corporate policy and federal law (Gomez-Mejia, Balkin, & Cardy, 2016). With Title VII regulating adverse actions against a person based on race and religion, workers perpetuated religious mocking and ridicule with head nodding and laughter to Maalick’s new religion.
Osha is the Occupational Safety and Health Administration an agency of the United States Department of Labor. Osha requires employers to provide their employees with safety from all known dangers. Osha was created December 29, 1970, and it was signed by president Richard M. Nixon.
This case study discusses the employment history and ultimate denial of a promotion for MarShawn DeMur, referred to by his legal name Maalick in this paper. Maalick filed a formal complaint of religious discrimination and racial harassment with the Director of Human Resources, EEO and Diversity Compliance Officer as employed by Trenton Communications Incorporated (TCI).
It is somewhat surprising that employers continue to violate employment laws dealing with discrimination. One case, Catterson v. Marymount Manhattan College, litigated and settled in 2013, was especially egregious. According to the EEOC (2013), the college had refused,
This case is followed by the laws and regulations of OSHA. OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Act) is an organization that has been put into place to ensure the safety of employees while on their jobs. These regulations are put into place to help reduce the number of on the job injuries and deaths.
In our company’s case the former employee alleges that enforcement of company’s new shift policy is discriminatory because the policy requires employees to work on a religious holy day.
When the employee asked why her religious beliefs to wear a hijab was different from another employees belief to wear a cross were difference, the response she received was that it would ruin the image the company is trying to portray. Never in the conversation did the employers mention how wearing the hijab could maybe place herself or others in a dangerous situation working with equipment, instead they insisted that
Businesses have been the heart of economic growth since the beginning of the United States. Not only has businesses been at the center of this nation but also freedom of religion as well. In this case, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc., its how the business (Abercrombie & Fitch), denies Samantha Elauf the job at that store because she wore a head scarf because she was a practicing Muslim.
This religious discrimination not only demonstrates the cultural problems that are present at the Midwest facility, but for the entire corporation. Even though Martra Ford handled the situation correctly and effectively once she was aware of the problem, other changes must be made to Treton’s EEO training and reporting procedures. Ideally, Maalick’s formal complaints will be dealt with quickly and disciplinary actions distrusted accordingly. Once this issue is resolved Judith Dixon and Martha Ford should determine how to solve the underlying issues that this scenario
According to Jackson & Schuler’s theory; “a variety of macro-level environmental characteristics influence the adoption of particular organisational HR practices, policies and philosophies.” (Hartel et al., 2006). Therefore macro-level environmental factors such as: laws and regulations, politics and culture all need to be considered by the HR department or HR Professionals as these factors will ultimately influence the organisation’s performance and overall success. Jackson and Schuler’s model indicates how aspects such as the organisation’s size, structure, strategy, technology and life cycle stage determine what and how information is interpreted, how
Religion in the workplace can bring up some of the most difficult issues employers have to face. Resolving these issues requires understanding the law and balancing the business's needs with an employee's desire to practice his or her religion. One of the most contentious conflicts is between an employee's desire to take time off and the potential reduction in productivity and profitability. In ruling on Title VII religion cases, the courts have held that employers aren't required to accommodate employees' religious activities when it involves increased financial costs, transferring supervisory personnel or employees from other departments resulting in inefficiency, or discriminating against other employees or violating seniority systems. Accommodations that don't constitute undue hardship to the employer include voluntary substitutions or employee "swaps," flexible work schedules, floating or optional holidays, staggered work hours, and allowing employees to make up lost time. Transfers and job changes also are options if they don't cause reduced efficiency or
To work in the Human Resource management field you must maintain and improve the company by planning, implementing, and evaluating employee relations and human resource policies, programs, and practices. It is a challenging and yet rewarding field to work in. However, just like every business field, people who work in the human resource department face many challenges when it comes to discrimination.
Facts of the Case: In 2008, Samantha Elauf applied for a job at Abercrombie & Fitch, Inc., who as part of their “Look Policy” prohibit the use of caps. Elauf, as part of her religious practice, wore a headscarf to the interview. She was interviewed by assistant manager Heather Cooke, who gave her a score that qualified her to be hired. Cooke, however, was worried that Elauf’s headscarf was against the store’s policy and called her district manager Randall Johnson. She informed Johnson of her belief that Elauf wore her headscarf because of her religion, and Johnson replied that headwear whether it was religious or not violated the “Look Policy” of the store. Elauf with the help of the EEOC sued Abercrombie on that Abercrombie did not want accommodate Elauf’s religious practice.