Human Security

Human rights based approach to risk management: responsibility balancing; advocacy; direct payments; personalised services; person centred planning, support planning

Describe how a human rights based approach supports an individual to make decisions and take risks

The opportunities people are given allows the great people of our country to do and change what happens throughout our population. We can inspire people of make thing, to change things, and to become inspired for our country. These rights are unalienable rights, the right to life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness. (Doc B) We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

I intend to discuss these issues while also discussing why it is important for these issues to be highlighted in this document. Firstly, the issues of personal rights are acknowledged at the beginning of the document. “Men are born and remain free and equal in rights. Social distinctions may be founded only upon the general good” . At this time, to be equal meant the end of legal differences.

“Humanity will not enjoy security without development, it will not enjoy development without security and it will not enjoy either without respect for human rights.” - UN World Summit, Outcome Document 2005. There have been many conflicts in the world that have affected

Human rights and justice-oriented framework. How does the social problem and social policy response reflect social, economic and environmental justice and human rights concerns?

The author, Mr. Paul Kennedy reports that both the actions needed to protect human beings, as well as report environmental issues, and world wide record keeping efforts have soared both in requests for services and the needed manpower to deliver these services. Continuing, the world is crying out for the kinds of services that could protect all humans. Ideally, an international police force that could serve and protect people in all corners of the world- would be a strong deterrent toward these acts of terrorism that we see each night on the world news scene (Human Rights).

This paper considers two issues: firstly, human rights in the developing world and secondly Canada’s responsibility of humanitarian assistance. Both issues are of grave importance and are mutually exclusive - as nations lacking strong human rights standards are more likely to require the greatest humanitarian assistance. Additionally, the need for humanitarian assistance will increase as global crises become more frequent, due to climate change insecurity (Adger, Huq, Brown, Conway & Hulme, 2003). The example of climate change will be utilised throughout this paper to explore the disparaging links between climate justice and human rights. In defining humanitarian assistance this paper will take Jamieson’s (2004) definition that humanitarian assistance is a response to crises via support in the short term to overcome disasters such as earthquakes and tsunamis. Whereas, development assistance considers the longer term issues in developing countries. By defining the two main types of assistance this paper will propose that greater investment into development aid may reduce the need for humanitarian aid as nations become more capable to support themselves. The body of this paper will consider key arguments concerning humanitarian assistance and human rights, including: Canadas humanitarian response in the developing world, the increasing need for global crisis response, human rights as a global responsibility and lastly the move from humanitarian to development assistance. In

The Operations Superintendent would have OPCON and TACON as well. Making small changes to how we operate as an organization to become more effective in daily operations would be TACON. The flight chief is the best example of TACON as they run the flight who is conducting the daily operations. They are told to conduct guardmount, but they are not told in what order they conduct their briefings or what type of information needs to be briefed every day. They also assign who gets posted at each location for the day. OPCON would be the post priority chart that tells the flight chief which posts are the most important and require the most manpower. TACON is used when the flight chief decided who will work the most important post and who will work the gates. Below is a flow chart to help you understand how OPCON and TACON blend together (Figure 1-1). ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROL (ADCON) Administrative Control is the direction or exercise of authority over subordinate or other organizations in respect to administration and support, including organization of Service forces, control of resources and equipment, personnel management, unit logistics, individual and unit training, readiness, mobilization, demobilization, discipline, and other matters not included in the operational missions of the subordinate or other organizations. ADCON is mostly the responsibility of the Service Chiefs and Secretaries. However, some functional areas can also utilize ADCON. CONCLUSION Understanding

Since the events of December 8, 1941 and September 9, 2001, there has been an immense change in the ruling of our national security and personal freedoms. The debate between the two is an intricate affair. Our national security has a direct effect on the lives of every citizen in this New World. America has yet to figure out how to retain both without a monumental problem occurring. National security is protecting against all national crisis, which demands taking away some civil liberties from the people. Having said that, a mass amount of people are not willing to give up those personal freedoms for the betterment of our nation because they feel that the government has taken it too far. National protection of the citizens

The readings this week focused on the development programs and assistance regarding fragile states. Most of the articles focused on different eras of security development and fragile states and practical examples such as Afghanistan while the last article, by Stephen Baranyi and Themrise Khan, stepped away from Afghanistan and focused on other fragile states. There were many themes this week, but the ones I want to address in my paper is the western centric approach to stability and security and the disconnect between policy and on ground action due to bureaucratic barriers to securitization. Though there were other themes present in the articles, these three stood out to me as being the most relevant.

In most of the cases opposing the concept of human rights to national security is erroneous and unreasonable construction because the national security is the concept which precludes the physical and mental security of all members of the society, and therefore includes and predetermines the possibility of exercising human rights and freedoms. Without security the well-being is impossible.

The author discusses the problems of a blurred distinction of internal and external security. As the world has become more globalized, complex issues that cross both internal and external

are critics of the concept of human security which claim that if all the components of well-being are

The traditional security paradigm is focused on physical and external security threats to states. It promotes that security should be state centred and national security is primary over other securities, such as human security. States must defend their territory and authority from external, foreign threats, by physical means, such as increasing the military or