Human Sexual Response Paper

An example of a romantic asexual would be an individual who identifies as hetero-romantic. These individuals are interested in romantic relationships with the opposite sex, but would prefer not to have a sexual aspect to that relationship (Scherrer, 2008). Another difference within the community involves masturbatory practices. Some Aces do masturbate for a variety of reasons, including tension relief or to experience an orgasm. Others, however, have absolutely no motivation or desire to masturbate. Many asexuals do not see masturbation as a sexual event for them, however (Scherrer, 2008). There is even variation in how asexuals view sex. Some Aces understand sex but are not interested in having it themselves, while others are disgusted by the act (Carrigan, 2011). There are asexuals who will have sexual intercourse with a romantic partner who identifies as sexual because it makes their partner happy, and there are others who would never consent to sex (Carrigan, 2011).

Contemporary understandings of sexuality are not the same as back in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. Understandings and terminology in the past hold multiple differences and similarities than our current contemporary understandings.

This assignment will help you explore the way a topic in human sexuality is covered in two very different sources: 1) a scholarly journal; and 2) a popular media source.For more information to help you understand the difference between those sources, please use this link to the APU library http://apus.libanswers.com/a.php?qid=5312. You will summarize a scholarly article (peer-reviewed, evidence-based, original research) and one popular media article on your topic. Once you see how the topic is covered in each source, you will write a paper:

Human sexuality is a common phrase for all, and anything, pertaining to the feelings and behaviors of sex for the human race. Sexuality has been a topic that has been discussed and studied for as far back as 1000 years B.C. and is still being studied today. As the discussion of sexuality has progressed through history, theories have been created based on research and experiments that scholars have implemented, based on their own perceptions of human behavior. Out of the many theories that pose to explain sexual behavior, Sexuality Now explained ten that are seemed to be the most overlapped, and built off of theories. Of these theories, two that were discussed in the text were the behavioral and sociological theory. These two theories cover some of the basic ideas of what could possibly influence a person’s sexuality.

Albert Kinsey helped change the American Public’s preconceptions on sexuality by publishing two bestselling books from 1947 to 1953 on the topic. Titled “American Sexual Behavior” and “Sexual Behavior in the Human Female”, these books both confirmed and challenged the generally held beliefs dealing with marriage, sexual gratification, and sexual orientation. Sex was deemed important for a healthy marriage, adultery was frequent and homosexuals weren’t weird anomalies.

If sexual orientation is something that we can’t change or choose, then how are these specific preferences such as heterosexuality and homosexuality created? How does one person progress to either heterosexuality or homosexuality? Studies showed that there were genetic factors linked to influencing sexual orientation in males before they were born by increasing the female reproductive capacity in mothers during multiple births. (Iemmole, Ciani, 2008: 393) Though that doesn’t mean that there technically is a “gay gene” that has been discovered, just that several human genome studies has suggested promising areas of research that are pointing to that direction. (Iemmole, Ciani, 2008: 393) With more

It is clear to see how social values have influenced research on sexuality in the past. Not only did society dictate what was right and proper for a scientist to study, but it condemned those who sought answers for the “improper” areas of study to career damnation. Even more discouraging is the way in which modern day society still puts limits on the research done in sexual physiology. In an era so tolerant and open-minded, one would assume that any researcher in honest quest for truth would be welcomed (and funded) with open arms. Unfortunately, this is not the case. In an article titled Long After Kinsey, Only the Brave Study Sex, Benedict Carey describes such limits on a study attempted in 2003, “In July 2003, for instance, Congress threatened to shut down several highly-regarded sex studies, including one of emotion and arousal, and another of massage parlor workers. And last summer health officials refused to finance a widely anticipated

Although we may find it simpler to think our sexual behavior, attractions, fantasies, and identities are all consistent and aligned, the reality of our world is that they are not consistent for many people.

Resistance to sex research has caused large misunderstanding about our human sexuality. This resistance has been shaped by our society’s moral views. Our society’s perceptions have greatly influence the type of sexual research conducted and the funding that has gone towards sexual research. This has overall influenced the outcome of sexual research has had.

In the early 1800’s Victorian True Love was a union of non-erotic actors (men and women) that viewed sex as a form of procreation. True Women were defined by their distance from lust and True Men who were less in control of their lusts, aspired the same freedom from sexual desires (Ferber, Jimenez, O'Reilly Herrera, & Samuels, 2009). In 1892, heterosexuals were defined as individuals that had abnormal urges in both sexes, while

Sexuality is a fundamental aspect of being human all through life and includes gender identities, sex, and sexual orientation, roles, eroticism, intimacy, pleasure, and reproduction (Chapman, 2008). Sexuality is expressed and experienced in thoughts, ideas, fantasies, desires, manners, values, behaviors, roles, relationships and practices. Though sexuality can encompass all of these aspects, not all of them are for all time experienced or demonstrated (Hunter, 1992). It is influenced by the interface of biological, social, political, psychological, ethical, economic, cultural, historical, legal, spiritual and religious factors (Simoni & Walters, 2001). There

I remain completely open-minded to heterosexual activities such as engaging in sexual activities before marriage, opposite sex arousal, for reproduction, and simply just for pleasure. This course contributed to the in-depth knowledge that I have gained toward heterosexual behaviors. Another area of the attitude questionnaire where my scores did not alter was within the masturbation/erotic subscale. Personally, engaging in masturbation as a sexual outlet whether in a relationship or not, is acceptable. Though this course I have learned additional reasons to why masturbation is a suitable technique within various situations, such as relieving stress, going to sleep, when ones’ partner is unavailable, and merely for pleasure. Now, after taking the Trueblood Attitude Questionnaire again at the end of the semester, I have realized that my attitudes towards my own and others’ sexual behavior have not necessarily changed, but they have broadened. I have learned to appreciate the different views towards sexual

Sexual health is a concern that continues for all adults regardless of age. Assumptions about aging, intimacy and sexuality are constantly a challenge because the desire for closeness and sexual contact are lifetime necessities (Rheaume & Mitty, 2009). Current research on sexual activity has suffered from inadequate population descriptions within different cultures, education and financial status. Findings are therefore limited leaving health care

1.The Masters and Johnson model of sexual response has four different phases: excitement, plateau, orgasm, and resolution

Throughout history there has been speculation about what influences sexuality in men and woman. Is sexual orientation biological or cultural in nature? There is a common misconception that sexual identity operate in parallel with gender roles( Sell, 2005 as cited in Wilkinson & Roys, 2005, p.65). Scholars have not came to an agreement regarding what actually comprise a person’s sexual orientation, however a sexual orientation has been deemed a cumulative experience and interaction of emotional and sexual feelings towards one or both genders (Wilkinson & Roys, 2005, p.65). The paper provides provides some clues as to what factors influence sexual orientation in men and woman.