Human Testing Vs Animal Testing Research

Animal testing is not only beneficial to human but also animals, at least to those who are not used in the experiments, such as pets and endangered species. Along with researching for new treatments and medicines for

Animal testing is a common practice in current life that is necessary to ensure the safety of the humans that will be using the tested product. There are many good and bad aspects of animal testing, but the pros clearly outweigh the cons. Animal testing has been around since ancient times when animals were dissected to gain knowledge about the body and organs. The animals killed from animal testing make up a tiny percentage of the total animals killed every year. When just considering the animals used for food compared to the animals used for testing, testing animals make up a mere 2.6 percent of that number. Public safety far outweighs the lives of the small amount of animals killed.

One reason that animal testing is bad is that it doesn't do that much good to humans. For example less than 2% of diseases found in animals are actually found in humans. This means that when animal testing it doesn't help that many people out. Also 92% of the drugs

There are some good things about animal testing but also bad things. The bad things of animal testing is that it can either kill animals or cause them long lasting harm. If the animal gets hurt during animal testing then it could heal but sometimes that’s not the case and some animals will suffer from permanent damage. That permanent damage might even be painful. The tests done on the animal may be painful as well. Some of the drugs and products that pass animal testing aren’t necessarily safe. Animals are also very different from people. The animal testing can also mislead researchers to ignoring potential cures and treatments for diseases and illnesses.

animal testing is the reason we are still alive today with all the medical advances we have now.

In conclusion, animal testing is wrong and it needs to stop. These animals are dying from things that can easily be avoided. The animals that are tested on don't always bring accurate results. People have talked about their experience with being tested on, yet we continue to use animals. These animals are innocent and most of them only know life I'm the testing facility. That is no way the

Supporters of animal testing might say that the tests help find new research that gets us one step closer to curing many diseases but they are misguided. Research shows that animals have different structure when compared to human beings making them poor test subjects. Animals have significantly different anatomic, metabolic, and cellular differences that make it hard to compare to humans. This fact proves that animal testing will get us nowhere in curing or helping humans in any way. Studies have shown that it creating an animal model that mimics the human model is nearly impossible . This statement is also false because animal tests may mislead researchers into ignoring potential cures and treatments.If it misleads the researches then it does not make sense for animal testing to still exist. One example of this case is chemicals that are proven harmful for animals but proven beneficial for humans. One case of this incident is aspirin where it seemed to cause liver failure for animals but benefits

Animal tests are bad because they can kill animals that they test on. Animal test can be good to because they can really help us if we get some thing that is supposed to work.animal tests are bad really bad because they can kill the animals and hurt our economy; the test subjects could die and then they would have to quit testing to go get another test subject so they could continue testing and that hurts our economy.

The debate about animal testing gains more and more attention every day. It is questioned whether it is ethical to test on living animals or not. Ethical or not, animals are the closest living organisms that have very similar structures to the human body. Animal testing has had a major impact on the improvements of finding drugs and treatments for our health and medicine. Both drugs and cosmetics are by law ought to be tested before being distributed out to the market. This law was established in 1938 when the U.S law passed the Food, Drug and cosmetic act. While searching to discover if my everyday facial cream is tested on animals I found that effectively it is. Knowing that the Neutrogena the #1 dermatologist recommended acne wash is being tested effectively gives the consumer relief of

Animal testing is good. If we didn’t test on animals then we wouldn’t know if our medicine worked or not. If we couldn’t test our medicine then we could give a human it and they could die.

Many people believe animal testing is very beneficial and necessary for human advancement. Due to improvements

25 million mice, alone out of 100 million animals, are used for testing annually. Animal testing is extremely harmful to different types of species. The Animal Welfare Act is a helpful way to begin to stop the testing. This act was signed as a federal law in 1966, this does not cover every animal used for different activities like farm animals used for fiber or for food and more (“Welfare”, 2017). Animals should not be used for human purposes. Animal Testing should be banned because this is a gigantic problem, animals become harmed in the worst way possible, and there are different ways to stop animal testing like donating to charities.

In conclusion to me animal testing is not ok for me because i don't like how they kill them feed them with drugs and injected with chemicals, This is just dirty way to treat all the animals like this and the government should stop the drug animal testing before they do any damage to the environment where they

According to Hajar (2011), animal testing prevents human tragedy such as killing people from a drug unsafe for humans. Because of animal testing, we have multiple life-saving cures and vaccines such as a vaccine for Hepatitis B (ProCon.org, 2016). Another good reason for animal testing is that animals are similar to us; in fact, chimps and mice have a close DNA match to humans (ProCon.org, 2016). Animals are a more suitable alternative than human test subjects when the tests could put a human in danger; it is preferred to harm the animals than the humans (ProCon.org, 2016). Another positive aspect of animal testing is that the animals could benefit from the test themselves; as an example, chlamydia vaccines have slowed down koala extinction

First off, animal testing is unethical, it debases the humankind. Animals don not willingly sacrifice themselves for further advancing of humans