Human Traits Are Biologically Pasted Down By Parents

The nature versus nurture debate is a controversial issue questioning whether or not human behavior is a result of biology. Nature is the idea that genetics and biology determine an individual’s behaviors and thoughts. The scientific study of how behavior is affected by biology is known as sociobiology. On the other hand, nurture is the idea that human thoughts, feelings and actions are the result of society and culture. In this argument, human behavior is learned through the influence of society, thus can be changed as societies change. In recent times, most scientists support gene-culture evolution. They believe that biology and culture are interrelated; biology is shaped by culture just as culture is shaped by biology. This means

“You inherit your environment just as much as your genes.” (Rich, 2015) In 1869, the phrase “nature vs. nurture was coined by an English polymath named Francis Galton. There are two sides to this debate, each with their own pros and con’s. Nature is the side that argues that the DNA and genotype humans are born with determines who they are and what personality and traits they will have throughout their lifetime. Whereas the nurture side of the debate argues that humans are born with sponges as minds, and through interactions and experiences while we grow, the knowledge and understanding of life is gained and this is how our personalities are sculpted. Many people have studied this debate through multiple schools of thoughts; each with their own arguments to which side they believe prevails. Yet, to this day, there is no proof to say which side of the debate if correct. Based on the psychological, sociological, and epigenetic schools of though, it can be validated that when it comes to the nature vs. nurture debate, nurture will always prevail and remain most relevant.

The historical debate regarding nature and nurture has been going on for years and is still unresolved. Many theorists believe what we have inherited and our genes, makes us the way we are and how we develop. Other theorists believe it is the way we are brought up and our experiences, that make us the way we are and how we develop.

A debate between psychologist, scientists and philosopher thinkers on the spectrum of ‘nature vs. nurture’ arose concerning human development. In the nature versus nurture debate, the term "nature" refers to the genes we inherit while the term "nurture" refers to our outside environment (Nature vs. Nurture: Twin and Adoption Studies). This debate of ‘nature vs. nurture’ has existed for centuries and up to now it is still a topic of major discussion although at present time. Human development is the scientific study of age-related changes in behavior, thinking, emotions and personality (Boyd & Bee, 2005). In order to understand cognitive, emotional, physical, social and educational growth that everyone experiences from

The old question about nature versus nurture has made a lot of different opinions in the world. Some people think that everything that they are, is because genetic. However, other persons think that the environment makes who they are. In my opinion nature and nurture make people’s life different, depending what factor people take to develop the differences between nature and nurture, it can explain if all human behavior are learned or is part of it inherited.

We know that our eye color, hair color, and height can be attributed to our genes. But what about our emotional or behavior traits? There has been an ongoing debate about whether nature or nurture matters more in determining the traits an individual will have. Nature is influenced by our genes and other biological factors. Nurture is the influence of external factors after conception, such as environmental factors and learning experiences such as our childhood experiences or social relationships. People know that both nature and nurture influence how we live, but how much of our traits are determined by this.

For many years, there has been on the ongoing debate that is referred to as nature vs. nurture. It poses a question that many theorists have contested. Do human personalities and behaviors relate to our genetic makeup, or are we directly influenced by the environment and people that we are subjected to? What is more important, genes or environment? While some theorists take either one side over the other, some believe that both nature and nurture play an active role in human development.

The human body and mind, when it deals with the nature and nurture aspects, hearing the word nature and then hearing the word nurture, someone might have to think about which one is which. Plus, which one contributes the most to what kind of person someone will end up being? The overall, nature cannot be changed and nurture can have such a universal variance of inputs that it would be difficult to distinguish which one had the greater influence.

Nature versus nurture has always been a big topic for discussion between scientists. To take a look at this further I took a look at a couple articles: “A Thing or Two About Twins", “Nature vs Nurture in Psychology" and the book “As Nature Made Him: the Girl Who Was Raised as a Girl” by John Colapinto. The case generated is that nature is the reason that humans are the way we are. Nature meaning genetics and heredity, while nurture is focused more on the environment. This case is significant for a study because it helps us understand how we as humans grow and develop into the individuals that we are. In the book David Remier, also known as Brenda was the test subject of the nature versus nurture debate with psychologist John Money conducting

This is an ongoing debate and understandably so. I do believe that both nature and nurture play apart in development. Nature in my opinion I 'd suggest that one of the reasons that people believe in the nurture effect is that

However, both of the articles talk about how environment and genes do not act independently. In article one it says, “The majority of experts believe that both nature and nurture influence behavior and development.” In Article two it says,“Both nature and nurture are essential for any behavior, and it cannot be said that a particular behavior is genetic and another is environmental.” They say it is none more than the other and we should start to ask the question, In which ways do nurture and nature interact with each other? Rather than which one is more

The nature vs. nurture debate has been a debate that has lasted through the ages about what the effects of biology as well as social influences has on a person and their behavior. The “nature” side of the debate argues that people are genetically predetermined to behave and react to situations in a certain way. The “nurture” side of the debate argues that our participation in social life is the most important factor in determining who we are and how we behave. Each side of this debate has very good points to argue its validity, making hard to decide whether a person's development is predisposed in their DNA, or a majority of it is influenced by life experiences and their environment. Today, we know that both nature and nurture play important

The nature-nurture debate has been around for decades. It is one of the oldest and most popular topics in the history of psychology asking what makes people who they become and how they behave and develop the way they do. What makes the debate more interesting is that now scientists are asking if personality traits and even sexual orientation can be determined by what is in already there from conception. Bodies are built up of chromosomes which contain genetic information. Many of these are inherited from parents and relatives. The nature side of the debate states the way people are is predominantly from inherited genetics and other biological factors not so much the environmental factors. The genes humans have in their bodies play a huge role to many aspects of who they are and who they become. For example, hair colour, eye colour and height are all predetermined by genes. Unchangeable. This is natures way. The argument stands to decide whether most attributes do stem from nature, genes, or if they can be affected by the environment and the way people are nurtured as they have grown. The nurture side of the argument believes although humans do have the genes and traits with which they are born, most personality traits are being made up of environmental factors. For example, being loved and cared for as children, if parents or carers were positive role models and if those people were taught in ways which provided them with discipline and respect for others. Where nature

Nature vs. Nurture The relative contributions of nature and nurture are an apparent part of human development which makes us ask the question, are heredity and environment opposing forces?(Sternberg 100) The question of nature vs. nurture can be examined and can be attempted to be comprehended in many ways. Our stand on which theory is the correct one is obviously a matter of opinion and makes us wonder if only one of them is truly correct. Nurture seems to be the explanation that holds the most tangible evidence to support it as existing in our everyday life. In psychological attempts to conduct experiments of genetic influences on personality and behavior in the environment psychologists have come to the conclusion that the best way is

The nature nurture debate through research is now viewed as a collaborative relationship between an individual's genes and environment through the process of development. This perception reveals gaps between perception and research to a certain extent as many people believe that development is a solely the responsibility of nature or nurture and not a combination. In regard to the relationship between nature and nurture, "the environment is very similar for many individuals, and that the genes, in effect, rely on the existence of that environment for their expressions" (Slee & Shute, 2015). This therefore stresses the idea that in order for an individual to thrive during development, their surrounding environment must be