Human Vs Robotic Space Missions Essay

The article, “Robots on Earth” by Jerry West, explains that although robots may be evil in movies and books, they help us more than people may think. In the article, West discusses how the opinions of the media are quite different than the jobs that real robots perform. Humans have many difficult jobs that must be done for the good of the population, which is why we have robots to complete these tasks. Chores such as welding, and working in factories harm our health; so, robots do these jobs to keep us safe. Robots in space may do simple missions so that astronauts can focus on more important duties. Also, astronauts use robotic equipment; such as treadmills; to stay healthy while in space. Other robots are used for people with disabilities

This claim is not necessarily true being that robots cannot get the experience of space like humans can. In Kennedy’s speech gives an example by stating, “An instrument recently developed to record automatically the impact of acceleration upon an astronaut’s eyes will also be of help to small children suffering miserably from eye defects…”. The robots are incapable of experiencing the physical change when leaving Earth and entering space so we are unable to observe these changes when using robots. Secondly, robots do not have the desire to search for more like humans. Robots do not contain the same drive and want to learn the possibilities of space so it is pointless to consider sending them.

Robots have been useful to humans since the past. They’re made to make human life easier. Since early times people have been dreaming of making robots and different people have made different kinds of robots. Robots has been useful in the past, they’re now useful in present-time, and they’re going to be useful in the future.

It is not true that human space travel is cheaper in any sense; life support systems, places to sleep and work, manual control systems all take up room, and most importantly, cost fuel. However, when it comes to planetary exploration, humans can get the job done better. They adapt to the situations they’re put into. A robot can only do everything it was told it was supposed to do, but programmer bound to the Earth will only think to program so many things, even if they are very thorough. Robots movements encompass a narrow set of navigable terrains whereas a human with mobility equipment can explore much further to garner samples or collect data (Crawford). A human can also think on their feet, which is essential in many mission scenarios. Far from the earth, where communication is severely limited by the distances involved, robots lag the humans watching. Events that occur for only a few minutes, like storms and novel hazards like rockslides or avalanches, may be completely missed by a rover and can even compromise the mission. When delay inhibits data collection and the safety of crucial components, this is where on-site humans can shine. Specifically, Crawford (2010) outlines five areas where human travel is necessary, which for brevity has been condensed into four. The focus is mainly on why humans are essential for these types of missions.

The author's purpose of this essay is contemplating whether or not laws should be made protecting robots. Throughout the essay he uses evidence from scientists who have dones tests, and it shows how people act.

These robots can be sent into space to bring extraterrestrial items back. For example, one of the main reasons they made the robots is to have a robot based mission. The main object of the mission is to find minerals and mine them on different asteroids. Many of the minerals on earth are from meteorites hitting Earth. One of the biggest minerals is gold. Gold controls money, which if we were to mine asteroids then we would be bringing money back with

On the contrary, the majority of space missions have been conducted by robots. The robotic method of space exploration is superior than human space flight. These robotic missions are a fraction of the cost of human missions, can go much farther away from Earth, are much safer than any human mission, and can conduct more research than a human space mission. First, the cost to spend another rover to mars would be around two and half billion dollars and the estimated price of a human mission to mars is fifty billion dollars.

Nevertheless, If NASA were to cut back on sending humans and instead send robots, they could save bundles of cash, and possibly, in some cases, lives (Etzioni, Amitai). Because of the vast expanses of space and the mystery that it contains, along with the action-packed movies made about space that captivate America even beyond their opening weekends, such as Star Wars, BattleStar Galactica, the humorous Space Balls, etc, and the simple fear of not knowing what, or who, is or is not out there, every person has some amount of curiosity in them in regard to the dark skies surrounding our earth. It is simply human nature to want to discover the unknown (Boucher, Marc p.2).

Space. Possibly the most unforgiving place possible for humans, and yet we desire to go there. We desire to travel to distant planets, new galaxies, and to know all that there is to know. We want all of this, and yet the mission to mars, and the first missions to the moon, we sent robots. There are many reasons for this and why we didn’t send humans, but the main reason we haven’t sent as many humans to space, is cost. It is extremely expensive to travel to space. So, robots are just cheaper. However, we want to send humans. We want to explore space ourselves. Therefor to accomplish our goals of sending humans into space, we need to make it cheaper to go to space.

As humans, we always push to explore for new discoveries, it is in our blood to explore and push scientific boundaries. Space exploration has allowed us to expand our technology, foster a curiosity in humans, discover new worlds, and most importantly push even further to discover life in a new planet. With the advancement of new technology and innovators, there has been a significant discussion whether sending humans with the support of robots is the most efficient method. However, there are great arguments made that sending exclusively robots on space exploration is the best strategy. There is

For Example the Curiosity rover cost 2.5 million dollars. This exploration was one million dollars over budget. This technology helps us though instead of having people die going to different planets we can explore the space without sending people. It also gives our society new technology from these explorations. Another difficult aspect of space exploration is the time it takes to find a possibly habitable planet.

Such as basic human resources of water, food, and shelter. Plus, all the logistics of organizing water and food supplies before launch for long destination missions such as Mars would be tossed out the window. With only relaying on robotic missions it will save the country millions per mission. Pertaining to the orbiter launches in 1998, it costed $420 million dollars per launch which was the most public campaign to space. The fact that the orbiters were headed to the same low earth orbit the experiments done on each launch was already similarly done with previous launches. Many groups claimed that with the $420 million dollars it could have paved the way for two unmanned missions to other places beyond (Rahls). Now after the shuttle program got cancelled it was calculated that each launch costed about $750 million. Which equivalently those could have gone to two to three robotic missions. With those missions, we could have made progress to understand why the universe has accelerated expansion (Rahls). Most of the million-dollar cost comprised primarily the ability to sustain human life when travelling in a hostile zero gravity environment. Even then with as much planning and supplies the mission will have a deadline whereas robotic missions will continue if people are available at ground station and if the rovers are

Imagine if you would not need to help Mom and Dad, carrying stuff for them or cleaning up after them! You can have a robot help you with your daily activities such as cleaning your room, washing your car, and even wiping for you once you are done using the bathroom. A robot is a machine designed to complete or carry out multiple tasks when programmed to do so. Robots play a huge role in discovery, such as Mars Curiosity Rover, that is used to observe Mar’s surface and environment. We have used Robots to study the moons surface to see what it is like and to learn more about space. We use robots today in military by using them to disarm bombs and find enemy locations. Robots will have a positive impact on our future, because robots will help us to discover more in the ocean and space, help us save lives, and aid in the military.

Introduction: For years robotic technology has depicted fictional humanoid robots in movies and television, consequently peaking our imagination of artificial life forms. No longer are humanoid robots fiction, but reality as roboticists have been developing them not only with an appearance based on a human body but with humanlike sensory and movements. Moreover, humanoid robots are performing human tasks from industrial to service jobs and can survive in any kind of environment. The advancement of robotic research involves the fields of science, cognitive science, programming and engineering (Cheng). Some people consider humanoid robots a threatening force because they feel they are not safe, they will take over our jobs, or are uncomfortable with their

There is also the fairness of the industry, in terms of human safety, public knowledge and financial fairness. The use of an astronaut took place long before we had the technological ability to replace humans with robots and now that we have the ability to, should we? Robots have replaced humans in several high-risk industries already, including bomb disposal and radioactive waste disposal. It would be only logical that robots began to transition into all high-risk jobs to save human lives, but the problem is they can’t. Robots are traditionally designed for one task and are not very versatile outside of that, although this has been rapidly changing we have not achieved true versatility as of yet. Given human input they can be modified to do other things, but this does not carry over to the space industry. Communication time between robots and Earth will continue to increase the farther we move away. For example, it would take nearly half an hour to communicate one way from Earth to Mars. This leaves too much delay, that is, by the time the robot receives a response it could be too late. Humans would be required for this task. This does not mean that the space industry requires humans for every situation. In fact, NASA designed a Robonaut in order to do tasks which were deemed unsafe for humans.