Humanistic Theory Analysis

In contrast to Freudian and Lacanian psychoanalytical theory which posited the unconscious as the driving force behind human action to which the self had little control, 'humanistic theory instead focuses on positive attributes t0 what they considered it to be human. To better understand some of the attributes and notions of humanistic theory the following paper analysis's two humanistic theories in turn. Specifically Maslow conception of self actualisation and Roger's phenomenological based personality theory. This is followed by discussing some strength and limitations to humanistic theories in understanding relationships, others and the self. In Katie's case she has a loving family and a sister who loves her but she still have this eating

In discussing two of the chosen theories, I made my decision to choose Humanistic and Behaviorist. In the Humanistic Theory, people are often looked upon as to handling their lives and actions, and they have the freedom and will to change their attitudes and behavior. Two important humanistic theorists and psychologists were, Abraham Maslow and Carl Rogers.

Carl Rogers, born in 1902, was the originator of the Person Centred Approach or Humanistic Theory. His work was influenced by his experience of being a client and a counsellor (Casemore, 2006) and he believed a trusting

Personality Theories Paper Anthony J. Hebdo Ohio Christian University May 30, 2018 Personality Theories Paper Psychodynamic theory is the view of personality with the focus on the unconscious and the importance of childhood experiences (Myers & DeWall, 2014). These theories view human behavior as an interaction between the conscious and unconscious mind. Psychodynamic theory focuses on trying to get inside the head of individuals to make sense of their relationships, experiences and how they see the world. Sigmund Freud was the leading psychologist of his time, and is best known for developing the theories and techniques of psychoanalysis.

Personally, I believe everything we achieve is earned. If we have a particular outcome in which we desire, then we will simply put forth the effort it takes to receive whatever that aspiration may be. One of my favorite sayings is “life is what you make it”. One can decipher that phrase, in such way that everyone has had troubled times in their life, but it is how one responds to those times that shapes them into the person they are today. Prior to knowing all of the modern perspectives, if asked, I would have assumed I shared only the same characteristics as the humanistic perspective. With that being said, after reading the first chapter in the book, I consider myself sharing some of the same outlooks as John B. Watson, as well. Obviously,

Humanistic psychology was created as a response to the limitations of the two forces already established, psychoanalytic and behaviorist psychology. One of the biggest differences between humanistic psychology and the other disciplines is that it views humanity in a holistic and optimistic manner rather than in fragmentations. One of the most significant and founding theorists of this humanism force was Carl Rogers. His contributions to the field, research on personality, and his psychotherapy techniques continue to expand and influence many researchers, psychologists, and counselors.

to allow the individual to gain awareness of self, whatever the identity is presenting at the time. This

Humanism is one of the most discussed theories of psychology, attracting criticism and acceptance in equal measure. I find the humanistic approach to psychology more appealing. The humanistic perspective holistically analyzes human behavior by focusing on the creativity of the human being, free will, personal responsibility, values, self-worth, and personal growth. Abraham Maslow and Carl Rodgers are the notable proponents of this theory. They both argue that a deep understanding of personality needs a focus on human desire for personal growth (Weiten, 2017).

positive state of mind rather that “l am sick” frame of mind. In order words

Humanistic approach focuses on human existence, where people have unique qualities that include creativity, freewill or freedom, potential and personal growth. People like Carl Rogers who have brought about person-centred theory and Abraham Maslow who has developed a hierarchy of needs, where he emphasized on self-actualization. There is an evaluation on both Rogers and Maslow theories, on how they are based on their own assumptions and views, and I apply Maslow’s theory of self-actualization into my own personal life.

Humanistic psychology is refereed as the '3rd force' in psychology it was an alternative to psychoanalysis and behaviourism. Humanistic psychology was instead focused on each individual's potential and stressed the importance of growth and self-actualization. A fundamental belief that people are born good but that this can be distorted through social interactions and life experiences. In this essay I plan to explain Carl Rogers’s theories of person centred and how I have linked them to myself. Carl Rogers stated that there was many key aspects which make up a person’s personality.

Augustine was a saint and philosopher. Some of Augustine’s thought can be related to the practice of humanistic psychology. My professional focus is the psychotherapy category called Humanistic-Experiential. Humanistic-Experiential therapies are, “psychotherapies emphasizing personal growth and self-direction” (Butcher, et al, 2006). The humanistic approach places primary importance upon human interests, values, and most importantly the belief in human potentials (Schultz & Schultz, 2009, pp297). Augustine’s idea of knowledge and understanding confront human problems of thinking and behavior. Humanistic psychology is able to help address the complexity of happiness and love according to Augustine.

The second concept being assessed is the Humanistic theory. Humanistic theory can be applied to other disciplines like sociology if an individual wants to enhance the understanding on how an individual behaves in the larger realm of society. Everyone deals with his or her own internal struggles that can ultimately affect other individuals around him or her. This view argues that an individual is free to choose his or her own behavior, rather than reacting to environmental stimuli or reinforce. In order to have a positive self concept an individual has a certain needs that must be met. These needs are basic needs, Safety, love and belong, achievement, and Self- Actualization

It all begins with the central idea of phenomenology and the idea that all people have free will (Funder, 2012). Another assumption is that all people are basically good. They have an innate need to make the world and themselves better. This lends itself to the idea that the approach is optimistic and is routed on the human capacity to persevere. Rogers and Maslow viewed personal growth and life fulfillment as the basic human motive. Which can be reduced down to the notion that each and every person seeks to grow and enhance themselves, psychologically.

As a member of the Canberra Humanist society, I felt a spark this year when I heard that some of the members had been investing energy into a program called the Humanist Chaplaincy. This service provides ethical and moral support from a non-religious perspective in institutions such as hospitals and universities, employing the most important tool available-- the art of listening. While the title ‘humanist chaplain’ sounds like a contradiction in terms to some ears, others have not overlooked its potential and significance. There is not only the positive function this role can serve in the community, but the scope for other community work that would only be limited by our imagination. If Aristotle thought ‘it is the mark of an educated mind to entertain a thought without accepting it’, I think it is the mark of an open mind, to entertain a thought without rejecting it. I know from experience how powerful the art of imagination can be. As an incredibly fortunate specimen, I somehow found myself capable of reaching beyond the confines of my narrowly defined identity and noticing a seed of intellectual enlightenment grow after decades of darkness. If that seed can grow at 30 years of age, with literally no prior interest in the Sciences, History, Art, Philosophy, introspection and discourse-- then it can happen to anyone, any time.