Humanitarianism

A Harvard study conducted across 100 countries found that whether rich or poor, people who give to charity are happier. Perceived happiness increases, even more, when we see the impact of our gift has on someone.

The humanitarian wanted to use government to pass stronger health and safety regulations; they saw science as a means to eradicate poverty and disease, and as professionals they sought to bring social order through the uplifting of the oppressed. They were the champions of educational programs for the immigrant, social welfare programs for the impoverished and improved health care for both. As humanitarians they sought to promote orderliness by investing in America's greatest resource-its children.

Humanitarian action is what the world turns to in case there is a crisis in any part of the world. But as David Rieff suggests in his book, “A Bed for the Night: Humanitarianism in Crisis,” there is a crisis in the humanitarian world and space. He draws from first personal experience in places like Bosnia, Rwanda and Kosovo to tell how some of the challenges humanitarian organizations face; including their struggle to be neutral and apolitical.

The next virtue, generosity is as important to the happiness and well being of a man’s mind as a hearty meal and exercise are to a man’s body. Without selflessness comes a loss of community and consequently, with a loss of community comes a decline in quality of life. With generosity, however, comes selflessness. The fulfillment that is gained from helping another human being is one of the purest forms of happiness that can be achieved. It is a broad, communal happiness that enriches the hearts of all involved. To live the good life is to be morally upright and to be morally upright is to help those around you simply in debt to the fact they need help, even if it is at some cost to you. Putting generosity on the backburner shows a wanting of concern for the well-being of the community and therefore obstructs happiness and delayed one's chance to taste the “good life.” from a utilitarian perspective a dismissal of generosity when generosity is possible can be akin to murder. Peter Singer gives a bright example of this when he equates not donating to a child in need to taking a child’s life for the purpose of trafficking their organs (Source 2). While one has a more sinister, direct, and clear motive with the other being

It is possible to improve the lives of locals simply by donating time. Organizations and charities like soup kitchens and clothing/food drives can help immensely. Raising awareness on certain issues can also ameliorate people’s lives and requires little to no money. For example, the ALS Ice Bucket Challenge, a social media challenge, made a colossal difference and some partakers didn’t even have to donate a cent of their money. “The ALS Association announced that donations related to the ALS Ice Bucket Challenge — the social media-powered video challenge, where participants pour a bucket of ice water on their heads and dare others to donate — have topped $100 million in the past month” (Diamond). The patrons that didn’t donate money simply posted the video of the challenge which spread awareness and caused others to donate. This just goes to show that altruism can be effective even without

In today’s world people are rather selfish and ungrateful, they help those who will eventually be helpful as well. They help others only with a desire and motive that they will also be helped in the future i.e. they will be repaid for their assistance. On the other hand, some individuals help others to only show their society and community that they are good people and are helping people although they do not necessarily intend to do it full

Like the video said: people who give with no purpose might not be helping much, but when people give because someone else needs it, needs can be satisfied. These people wanted to help because that is what they were taught to do: it is hardwired into their brains. Children are taught morals by their parents and the world around them, and they grow up using these morals to make judgements and decisions (pg. 72). These hardwired morals are why some people are more likely to help than others. They not only accomplished the goals of helping children but they also instilled in them that helping other people is ethical. It was indeed worthwhile, because now these kids will now grow up knowing what helping others can do, so they will continue

According to Klein, people selflessly give because they not only care about the issue, but believe the solution is the correct one (Klein, 2011). My experiences in giving based on Klein’s statement were definitely the reason I gave in the first place. I have been fortunate to give to many causes. I gave to my church to fund a certain event, I also gave to support those in another country that is less fortunate and destitute, and then there were smaller events like toy drives during the holidays.

The incentive offered for a charitable act helps the person whom is offering help. Any great work should indeed be rewarded. There are benefits from both sides, the charity gets what they need and the person gets a reward. This is no complicated situation, this is the problem with

I feel very compassionate about helping others, My children and I have been fortunate to volunteer for Habitat for Humanity, food pantries, mission work in Mexico, food distribution at Christmas and Thanksgiving through my church and assisted with clean up in the 2011 Joplin Tornado. Volunteering for me is my way of showing compassion for others in need and letting them know they are not alone and they

The reason why people donate to charity is to help other people out that are in need. Some wealthy people donate to the homeless. People donate either clothes or food maybe

When you smile, I smile. When you are not smiling, I will crack a joke, speak soothing words; otherwise my smile might fade. When I volunteer, I relish in spreading smiles. They say volunteering is selfless, but is it really? Yes, I volunteer because it enhances lives, but it also fulfills me. I have been blessed with intelligence, strength, and diligence. I feel my abilities would go to waste if I do not use them to improve lives. Giving back is part of who I am, and I would hate to live a life where I do not give back.

I didn’t truly understand it at the time, but as I grow older and mature I am beginning to understand more and more. Also, in that same conversation, my father told me about some of the people he works with and works for, and how they give back but often only in the spotlight. They will donate money when the attention is on them, or they will do charity events when the media is involved. Looking back at it, this is a very selfish idea. When do we hit that point in our life where we are so selfish that we can not help others; is it a conscious decision or are we just not aware of our actions? I have seen this same of idea of selfishness in my own experiences. I went to a very wealthy private school, with many students coming very wealthy families. Often these families would donate money to the school, but in return they expected a plaque or they expected something to be named after them, some kind of recognition. Some people will say this is not selfish because they are giving back; however, others will say this is a selfish action because they are only giving looking for a return.

Hugh (1898) further argues that people recognize that they are motivated, in most if not all cases by their need to advance their self-interest. However, when they reflect on this issue, they are mistaken by the urge to believe that the truth is the centrally of this. Actions that are meant to show concern for other people, such as helping the needy are self-satisfying to the actor, and they expect that they will their reputation in the society and obtain returned favors. A good example is that of political aspirant who might engage in a lot of philanthropic activities in his community to win the support of his constituents.

Humanitarians were people who believed in improving the conditions in which people live. In the 18th century, they belonged to many professions such as being politicians, writers and industrialists. They believed that slavery was unnecessary and evil and that it violated the true natural state of man – Freedom e.g: such humanitarians were