" The Biased Eye" is all about how humanity with out thinking makes stereo types and wants its self to look better then others. "WWYD" is about the same things but tested in real life situations, it makes us ALERT to what life really is. To see what real life people would do in real life problems. Because when it comes to it humanity is all about the ego. But is that a FLAW? Starting with homeless violence, many people just walked by and stared at the NEGLECT. The only reason they didn't help was because they didn't want to get involved with someone that is viewed as dirty or lesser. There was a DEARTH supply of people who actually did something and that was because they felt bad and they didn't wanting that to happen to them. So even though …show more content…
When people didn't help it was they "didn't want to get involved." Or "its not are plane, glad we aren't on that plane." Then when people did help it was because they would want someone to do the same if it was their flight. At the end of the day no one ENTREATED the pilot to stay. Either its not their flight to what if it was mine people are the same. The NOVELTY is they only do thing threw the act of them selves. Last is children on leashes and how people will react. When people where PRUDENT it was because they saw it as embarrassing because they they would be embarrassed. Then when people just walked by it wasn't a big deal because no one was a big threat of danger at that point in time.especially at the beginning it was very CIVIL, until they brought the dog in. Back to when people did help it was because they could relate, like one girl had kids so she felt uncomfortable and at dismay. Humanity we are full of ego we only do anything with are selves in mind. Always making sure that are life is how we want it be and that we look good. But is that bad if every one like are PEERS does it and most the time with out thinking? Some people are more OBLIGING to get involved. We show are egos ing different way but the common thread is are life and everything we do is revolved around are
“I ain’t a southern negro,” he said. “I was born right here in California." With these
There are times when a disaster for horrific event brings out the best in people not the worst. We see this right here at home when there is a tornado or a hurricane. Many times people band together to help others through the hard times. People will donate clothes, food, blankets, all to families who have lost everything and have nothing. Also as i said before families did take jews in to protect them. An article from healthland.time.com in 2011 says, “Everyone is on edge, of course, but it also pulls people away from a lot of trivial anxieties and past and future.”(Solnet) Sometimes disasters bring us together as communities in a way nothing else can. Our first reaction is to take care of ourselves but when the smoke clears we tend to help each other out. However this is rare it always seems to be that more people take care of themselves first and that's why it is such a big deal when people put others first. Whenever somebody does something good there is extensive news coverage and a large amount of conversation about it. This shows that it is not the normal thing. We are so used to people not helping but hurting others that we are blown away when somebody does something good. Really bad things tend to take our minds off the everyday problems and stresses that we have. We put all of our effort and attention into the bigger problem and tend to stop solving our smaller ones. This can be a good thing because it relieves our stress but it also helps us procrastinate and let some of our responsibilities
So why are people like this? The world may never know but it can be assessed that maybe people just don’t want to have the responsibility of someone’s life on their hands. Like why would you? If you attempt to save them and fail then you are forever haunted by the memory of the look in that persons eyes when the light leaves them. If you succeed you are hailed as a hero and the crushing amount of attention that the media places on your head will crush you and eventually lead to your untimely demise at the hands of suicide or your loved ones finding you hanging from your second story banister, so either way it ends
Do you really think people in our society today accepts everyone even after they have met them? The book "Of Mice and Men" shows society does not accept anyone they are unfamiliar with. Most people do not accept different, but there are others here in our society that actually accept these unfamiliar people. Some people are here to help you through life and some are not.
Today's world is filled with both great tragedy and abundant joy. In a densely populated metropolis like New York City, on a quick walk down a street you encounter homeless people walking among the most prosperous. Unfortunately, nine times out of ten the prosperous person will trudge straight past the one in need without a second thought. A serious problem arises when this happens continually. The problem worsens when you enter a different neighborhood and the well-to-do are far from sight. Many neighborhoods are inhabited only by the most hopeless of poverty - ridden people while others downtown or across the park do not care, or are glad to be separated from them. Such is the problem in New York City today and in Mott Haven in Jonathan
The 20th century was a of time of hardship during which humanity confronted some of its most significant challenges and choices. Conflicts between world powers emerged and choices were made that affected humanity tremendously. However, during the time, many achievements in science and literature were made, instilling hope as well as faith in people. John Steinbeck was one of the influential authors whose writing inspired and taught people about flaws and virtues of humanity and its past. In his writing, he conveyed ideas that he felt would stimulate change that would help make the world a better place. Of Mice and Men was one of his novels that described some of the worst in humanity, including the powerlessness of the oppressed, and societal
In life human nature can be known to be thought of as a high quality and/or low quality. Naturally, human nature is there without thought about what it actually is. In the novel Of Mice and Men by John Steinbeck, the author sprinkles clues and evidence of how human nature was and still is today. The themes that Steinbeck used throughout the novel were, for example friendship, loneliness, and weak vs. strong.
In the 1930's discrimination was still commonplace in society. It is almost a polar opposite of the 21st century's view. It's amazing and sad in a way that Of Mice and Men's prejudice issues still have relevance in today's society. The novel is littered with racism, sexism, and other types of discrimination, but I have chosen three very diverse characters. Crooks is an injured African American who works on the ranch. Curley's wife is the wife of the Boss's son. Candy is old an injured worker who was forced to work as swamper because of his injury.
All three novels: The Awakening, by Kate Chopin, The Grapes of Wrath, by John Steinbeck, and 1984, by George Orwell, deal with notions of human emotion and more specifically, amiability. When one is turned away from his or her peers and social structure, depression is soon to follow. The aforementioned works showcase the negative repercussions of disregarding human interaction and kindness, and in turn highlights how necessary these traits are to live. In The Awakening, there is a clear lack of tolerance from society regarding Edna’s new desires, and she kills herself. In The Grapes of Wrath, the family is turned away and shunned, and as a result, their lives are miserable and many of them end presumably sooner than if the family had not been shut out. In 1984, the entire government is void of any true emotion, which diminishes the quality of life so much to the point where it is almost not worth living, which one might argue is even worse than death. Compassion is vital to survival, and these novels encompass and demonstrate the importance of empathy.
Money is power. A timeless expression, one that often proves true. But money doesn’t always automatically grant one power, or prevent being powerless in a scenario, like in the face of racism or sexism. Something that money does do, however, is change the way that prejudice affects one, whether its by making dreams difficult, or tipping the scales in a power struggle. In his novella “Of Mice and Men”, John Steinbeck portrays this power imbalance by showing that those who are oppressed, but wealthy, experience prejudice differently that those who are oppressed and poor.
The novel Of Mice and Men by John Steinbeck displays prejudice with many of the characters in the book such as Candy, Crooks, and Curley’s and shows the reader multiple ways people can be discriminated, how it’s wrong, and it hurts people. Steinbeck displays Curley’s wife’s loneliness by “I get lonely, she said. You can talk to people, but I can’t talk to nobody but Curley” (Steinbeck 87). This shows the reader that no one is talking to Curley’s wife because she is a married woman so she is isolated from the other men. Crook is the only black character in the book. He is stuck in a little shack by himself separated from the other workers. For example, “I ain’t wanted in the bunkhouse and you ain’t wanted in my
Stereotypes and prejudice abound in America at all stages of societal development. Lenny, in Of Mice And Men, frequently becomes misunderstood and ill treated because of his mental afflictions. His penchant for petting soft things and desire to hold onto objects when frightened mark him as a deviation from the norm. However, the injustices done towards him remain obviously specific to the events of the plot, and cannot provide evidences of a broader societal condition.
?Over the past year, over two million men, women, and children were homeless? in America. (NLCHP) Homeless people face an intense struggle just to stay alive despite the fact that society turns its head from the problem. The government makes laws that discriminate against homeless people, which make it, illegal for them to survive. The mistreatment of homeless people is an issue that is often ignored in our community. When you see a homeless person on the streets how do you react? Do you turn your head and ignore them? Do you become angry that they are living on the streets? Do you feel frightened and avoid the situation all together? Or do you see these people as human beings and treat them in that
Eyes, both human and animal, appear as a predominant motif in John Steinbeck’s “The Snake.” Eyes serve not only a descriptive function, but signify two different modes of looking. One mode, embodied by Doctor Phillips, is scientific; the other, embodied by his female visitor, is bestial. Doctor Phillips uses sight to exert control over his environment; the woman’s way of looking proves more powerful, however, by achieving a truer understanding of the irrational impulses that govern the natural world.
What we see today is that organizations paint this image of morality and striving to help the homeless, when really what they preach compared to their actions are very incongruent. For example, Mr. Gladiator is a Muslim and he was praying outside of Kroger and was asked to leave because he was supposedly disturbing customers, but in reality he was just praying for them. This ties into commercialization where businesses will kick homeless people out of their properties establishment to appear more high quality. This is contradicting because they boast about what they do for communities, yet the situation such as this says otherwise.