“ Humans are naturally virtuous or selfish” becomes a popular topic to the society now day. Humans are mostly narrow-minded because people are indifference towards each other, people injure each other and humans damage the environment awfully. People are apathetic to each other because individual focus on their phones instead of talk with others. People like the things which are good for themselves, so people will always try their best to gain interests although sometime will hurt others, this can prove people are selfish. Animals and plants are all living on the earth with humans, but people damage the environment which humans living in. People not only harm to other people, but also hurting nature. Humans are apathetic about each other, individual does not show amicable to others, people usually put to much efforts on their phone. …show more content…
"Bubble Tea Is Really Bad for You." The Daily Meal, www.thedailymeal.com/cook/bubble-tea-really-bad-you. "China's Poison Milk Kills Three Children and Leaves 6,000 Sick | Daily Mail Online." Mail Online, www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1056151/Chinas-poison-milk-kills-children-leaves-6-000-sick.html. "How Indifference Can Kill a Relationship." World of Psychology, psychcentral.com/blog/archives/2009/02/28/how-indifference-can-kill-a-relationship/. "How Smartphones Could Be Ruining Your Relationship." liveboldandbloom.com/10/relationships/how-smartphones-could-be-ruining-your-relationship. "How Smartphones Could Be Ruining Your Relationship." Live Bold and Bloom, liveboldandbloom.com/10/relationships/how-smartphones-could-be-ruining-your-relationship. "Reversal Of Fortune: Deforestation Of Amazon Rainforest Increased By 28% Over Past Year." International Business Times,
Cell phones and technology are wonderful tools for us to communicate and to grow as society but even though there are many benefits of using cell phones in the various social environments, there is also the greater disadvantage of the usage of the devices. The effects of being rude to one another, “light” unimportant conversations, and weak relationships between peers or family members. In today's world people are way too connected electronically and disconnected emotionally. As there is a lot of controversy to if cell phones are running society's social lives or not, research has shown that they are in fact hurting and affecting how people are interacting and communicating with one another. Between the lack of empathy and the lack of face to face conversations, cellular devices “smart phones” are the major reasons society is seeing a negative effect in people’s social life
Tannen believes that much of this breakdown is caused by the lack of people interacting face to face. She feels that our high tech world infused with social networking, email, cell phones, texting and more has given people a way to communicate without actually connecting with each other. “The proliferation and increasing portability of technology isolates people in a bubble-” warns Tannen.
Human nature is one of the most fought over values of human life. People argue that we can overcome it for the better good while others believe that we will always be looking out for our own
Cell phones are commonly the first and last thing that the people in our society look at before they go to sleep. All over the place you can spot children who "are all hanging out, but instead of looking at each other, they are staring at their phones." (Newsela, From phone-to-phone). In this day and age, people are losing the ability to communicate, and instead of doing so they text each other on their phones. No matter where in the world, kids spend more time "corresponding with their friends through text messaging rather than talking to them in person." (Newsela, From phone-to-phone). These phones are taking away the ability to speak to one another. Not only that, but they are taking away part of what it means to be human. Ray Bradbury sends this message as well in his novel, Fahrenheit 451. One of the characters in this book, known as Clarisse, talks about how she enjoys communication and how she thinks that "being with people is nice. But I don’t think it’s social to get a bunch of people together and then not let them talk, do you?" (Bradbury 27). Bradbury shows that if humans do not talk to each other, even if they are together, they all not being social. Bradbury also expresses the fact that if people do not interact, they will not be able to remember one another. Montag can't even remember his own wife. He tries and tries but can only come up with "my wife, my wife. Poor Millie, poor, poor
Deforestation has lead to terrible living conditions and 38 species have been driven to extinction. John Vidal, author of “The Sumatran Rainforest Will Mostly Disappear Within 20 Years,” writes about the ways logging companies are getting past regulations to take more land and logs away from the forest and natives. Ian Sample, author of “Amazon’s Doomed Species Set to Pay Deforestation’s ‘Extinction Debt,’” on the other hand mostly talks about the affects deforestation has on animals. Vidal has the better argument over Sample because his explanations about its effects on humans and corruption from companies and the government.
Bartel (1976) defines prosocial behaviour as ‘behaviour that intentionally helps or benefits another person’. Batson (1987) defines altruism as ‘helping another person for no reward, and even at some cost to oneself.’ This definition of altruism seemingly depicts the behaviour as selfless, however there is a wealth of research which suggests that this is not the case.
A key factor in human nature is for people to be selfish and it is
Is moral selfishness a decent good hypothesis? Moral pride is the regulation that every individual should seek after his or her own self-intrigue only. As per this hypothesis profound quality depends on everybody advancing his or her self-intrigue or narrow minded thought processes. The contention for moral vanity from Altruism perspective, we are not in a position to know the interests of others. Since we can 't know other 's interests, we can 't attempt to help other on the grounds that it is not to our greatest advantage.
In psychology, altruism and egoism are two contrasting views on morality, one holding that one should value principles/actions that benefit others over oneself, the other holding that not only are we innately selfish species, but that selfishness is how one ought to act. While both theories of morality are prevalent throughout history and cultures around the world, I will be examining the two sides of egoism: physiological and ethical, and how these can be connected to altruism. These theories are essential because they provide a foundation, development and a further understanding of one’s needs.
“The claim that the rain forests are being destroyed "at a rate of 20 football fields a minute" is false . In addition, claims that the Amazon serves as the "lungs of the earth" and that over "450 species" are
The main reason we are losing human interaction is technology. When one talks on the phone or texts someone, they aren’t talking face to face. People can say all kinds of things when they text but when it comes to saying it in person they will not do it. When people order things online, the product is getting shipped to their
Philosophers have debated for centuries the question “Are humans are selfish or selfless?” There are two main arguments for debating human nature, ethical egoists and ethical altruists. Ethical egoists believe that “even though we can act in others’ interests because we are concerned for others, we ought always to act in our own interest” (Solomon et al 2012 p. 460). Ethical altruists believe quite the opposite; ethical altruism is the belief that “people ought to act with each other’s interests in mind” (Solomon et al 2012 p. 461). In discussing the four theories, psychological egoism, psychological altruism, ethical egoism, and ethical altruism, with my husband, there was not a clear dividing line for whether humans are selfish or selfless in nature. After much debate, we concluded that humans are born ethical egoists; however, ethical altruists are made through proper training, care, and nurture.
Over the years technology has been growing fast. Knowing human use communication by texting and calling. It’s careless for humans because not seeing each other could cause them to have problems. Instead of going out together and be active they just waste time on their phones. Humans putting a stop of when they have access to their phones so that they can spend more time with friends.
Human nature is what tells us apart from each other and makes us distinctly human. Our nature and understanding is what makes us different from animals and other creations due to our ability to think and reason. No other creature on this earth has that given ability. Our reason gives us the upper hand and allows us to reflect on our nature and behaviors that allows us to make changes and transform. For example, when facing adversity, we have the choice to continue with our struggles or terminate the situation; if we witness someone else’s misfortune, we have the option to follow in their footsteps or avoid making the same mistake. Human nature, gives us the capability to express our emotions, love and connect. It also allows us to display emotions and actions that are not always appropriate like hate, rape, murder and war. Despite our positive sides, as humans we are capable of destruction, competiveness and greed. Although, I strongly feel that a person’s environment and upbringing will shape their life choices, it does not automatically define who they are or
Selfishness. A personality trait that only bad people have. Incorrect. Selfishness is part of the nature of every living human being. Despite what all humans may believe selfishness is a part of all of us and is the driving force behind everything we do. In order to survive humans must be selfish and think of their own needs above other peoples. We must be selfish to our surrounding environment by using the resources essential to humans that our environment bears. Strangely enough it is often considered an insult to be called selfish.