Humans Need An Omnivorous Diet

In the world today there are 16 million vegans. But what are Vegans? A Vegan is a herbivore, meaning they do not eat any animal products such as, meat, dairy, poultry, fish or honey and for some who are more extreme, do not use leather, silk, fur, wool, and any other product that contains animal byproducts. So why might someone want to be Vegan? There are a number of reasons for someone to pursue veganism. For some it is ethical, and others environmental or health reasons, but there has been a recurring question on whether Vegans are getting enough iron and protein. Organic Authority said, “that per calorie kale has more iron than beef.” In regards to protein, a 100 calorie portion of steak, contains 5.4 grams of protein, whereas a 100 calorie portion of broccoli, contains 11.2 grams of protein (Hite 2013). Clearly eating a Vegan diet does not mean that there will be a deficiency of protein, iron or any vitamins besides B12, which has to be supplemented. Environmentally, agriculture is very damaging as well. As stated by Cowspiracy “64% of greenhouse emissions, are a result of livestock, their byproducts, and transportation of the

Since time immemorial, meat has always been the human’s primary source of food even way before plants were discovered to be edible. Humans won’t

In the introduction to “The Omnivore’s Dilemma, Our National Eating Disorder,” author Michael Pollan argues that many American’s in today’s contemporary society have lost touch with where their food comes from and which foods actually are nutritious. We have become an unaware society and allowed our daily simple routine of eating healthy meals to become a complex mess of fear for being unhealthy. I feel that Pollan is making an effective argument in stating his beliefs and factual knowledge on the confused relationship our nation has with food by using factual knowledge and evidence to persuade the audience that he is credible.

It is very difficult to obtain the necessary protein from a limited source of vegetables plants only. This experiment should had a balance of animals and plants. The selected animals have to be able to produce enough quantities of proteins and at the same time, able to consume small amount of food sources. The selected plants, should had the characteristic of growing with little water, small space, and able to produce enough nutrients for humans consumption and animal consumption. In the other hand, there are many other ways to obtain the necessary protein from plants alone, but some of them required long process and a large open areas to be plated and harvest. Even with the limited production of food sources from animals, in their case the members of this project struggle with weight lost, hunger and fatigue. I believe that a combination of both is possible. Any trash or unusable matter from plants and animal could be use reuse through a bio regenerative process.

Animal meat has all necessary nutrients, especially protein that is necessary for the human body to grow and function properly. Besides, it plays a vital role in brain development. As suggested by Smil (2013), “Killing animals and eating meat have been significant components of human evolution…have inevitably contributed to the evolution of human intelligence…” (p.1). According to the findings of the University of Colorado (2012), anthropologists have excavated a toddler’s “skull fragment” in Tanzania that is the abnormally tiny size of skull, due to a protein deficiency in the diet and led to youth mortality; this condition was very rare in 1.8 million years ago. This indicates that animal meat is a paramount in the human body, without the essential amino acids that exists in animal meats; human evolution cannot happen (p.1).

Meat is part of a balanced diet. If humans stopped breeding animals for meat, then we would have to hunt all the wild animals for food. The wild animals will be hunted into extinction because of gluttonous meat-eaters. Because of factory farming, meat is now available at all time at the super market. This makes meat convenient to obtain and eat nutritionally. Meat contains all the essential amino acids that we need every day to remain as healthy individuals. Minerals and vitamins that are also beneficial to the growth and development of the human body are found in meat too. Eating specific types of meat such as fish provides healthy natural oils that cannot be found anywhere else. Abandoning meat as a source of nutrition means we will need to compensate with another source of sustenance.

They therefore may feel the need to follow a vegetarian diet which means they do not eat meat, poultry or fish (unless pescetarian who do eat fish) but do still eat dairy products and farm produce e.g. eggs.

As my thesis states we don’t know what to eat because we can eat everything. That is a problem because as he states on page 103 “ Today the modern omnivore has almost no culture to fall back on” Culture is important because it tells us what to eat. And it tells us what our ancestors ate.For lot of other people like mexicans, they have always ate rice and beans. “For some animals there is no dilemma at dinner”(101). For years the fisher cat has just ate meat and the crow has just eaten and seeds and mice. Because that is all they need. But we have too many options to choose from, and we don’t need all of them.

Omnivores are very interesting creatures. We are able to digest most plants and animals and therefore have

What am I exactly eating? Where does our food come from? Why should I care? “The Omnivore’s Dilemma” may forever change the way you think about food. I enjoyed Mr. Pollan’s book, “The Omnivore’s Dilemma” and learned a great deal of information. Pollan’s book is a plea for us to stop and think for a moment about our whole process of eating. Pollan sets out to corn fields and natural farms, goes hunting and foraging, all in the name of coming to terms with where food really comes from in modern America and what the ramifications are for the eaters, the eaten, the economy and the environment. The results are far more than I expected them to be.

It is very easy to be amazed at the variety of products that can be found in today's supermarkets, all over the world. The United States in particular is a society of consumers, and many in this country would expect no less than full shelves of everything from produce, to meats, to snacks, etc. However, what most consumers today fail to realize is that the variety seen in most supermarkets in this country is really not too varied at all. In fact, the point that Michael Pollan aims to make in the first chapter of his book is just that: everything comes from corn. The paragraphs below will detail this author's beliefs in relation to today's consumer market, and focus on the ways in which most of us consume the products we are offered (often without questioning anything). Pollan's point will be stressed in this paper as well; namely, that today's society is suffering from poor nutrition and a lack of variety, due to the fact that 'everything boils down to corn,' as Pollan states, as well as the relative lack of education about the places from which one's food comes.

Amidst giant supermarkets and effortlessly accessible meals, Americans eat whatever is in the grocery store. But the question remains, where did that “cage-free” chicken really come from? Americans are lost in their understanding as to where their food actually comes from. The author of The Omnivore’s Dilemma, Michael Pollan, asserts that Americans are facing a modern-day version of the omnivore’s dilemma wherein they don’t know what to eat. This is because of fickle science that influences confused Americans, America’s lack of a food culture, and people’s unfamiliarity with the food process.

There are two main lifestyles that we as human beings practice that impact our eating habits. One being a Vegetarian, a person who chooses not to eat meat. The other being a Meat Eater (also known as an Omnivore), a person who chooses to eat both meat and vegetables. A controversial debate continues to go on, evaluating the pros and cons of each group, along with the reasons behind their choice. In the end it all depends on the individual’s outlook on life that makes the decision.

The diets of Homo neanderthalensis and Homo sapiens are very different. The diet of the Homo sapiens shows how they were learning to adapt better to their environment, while the Neanderthals were very set in how they gathered food. Studies of nitrogen preserved in the bones of Neanderthals have shown that they consumed a substantial quantity of meat; “comparable to that eaten by contemporary wolves” (Delson et. al 2006). The current interpretation of the Neanderthal diet is that they “were most likely hunters rather than scavengers” (Delson et. al 2006). It was once thought that the Neanderthal diet was comprised mainly of meat due plant life being seasonal in the cold climate they inhabited. Evidence suggests however that the “Middle East Neanderthals ... living in the relatively warmest climate consume mostly meat” (Sawyer et al. 2007) proving that

The first argument that is brought up about the two opposing lifestyles is the food that one is able to consume and the health benefits that come from eating said lifestyles. In terms of an omnivore, one is able to eat any and everything without restrictions; This includes meat, seafood, starchy and non-starchy vegetables, fruits, legumes, grains, and nuts. However, on average, omnivores do not consume enough healthy fruits and vegetables, tending to consume mainly meats, dairy, and grains. Meat, especially beef, is high in harmful cholesterol and fat, which is not good for the body. In addition, this also means that, on