Humorist Synthesis Essay

There are over 7 Billion people in the world each with their own individual thoughts, ideas, and innovations. Based upon this fact, it is evident that there will be disagreements and conflicts amongst peers. In order to present these problems and arguments within the world in an entertaining, but informative way, satires are used. Satire is the use of humor, irony, exaggeration, or ridicule to expose and criticize people’s stupiditiy or vices particularly in the context of contemporary politics and other topical issues. Through the use of exaggeration, humor, irony, and a variety of other similar techniques, controversial topics involving things such as politics can easily be presented.

Humorists are often seen as insignificant contributors of society. People consider humorists no more than just “entertainers”, willing to make fun of anything in order to make a crowd laugh, however, has the audience ever contemplated why humorists are the some of the only people who are allowed to critique anything that crosses their mind without consequences? Alain de Botton, claims the vital role of humorist is, “to convey with impunity messages that might be dangerous or impossible to state directly.” I agree with Alain de Botton’s claims, that humorists do hold an important role in society, which is far more than to entertain. They break the ice on delicate topics, communicating the messages to society. Political cartoons and the Colbert

In Status Anxiety, author de Botton correctly claims that humorists are expected to not only entertain their audience, but to make statements about controversial events that may be too sensitive to say directly and causally present them in a way that is easy for the public to understand. This is demonstrated through various forms of media such as television shows and political cartoons.

America is a culture that enjoys having some time away from the reality of political issues within society. Comedic entertainment has found ways to also inform its audience about important political statements that is used to “refer to any act or nonverbal form of communication that is intended to influence a decision to be made for or by a political party”( Wikipedia), or ideas through a comedic point of view. Comical news is what brings our attention with ease because listening to straight political debates can lead a person to not want to sit and become informed on latest political topics. The culture that society has developed into became accustomed to finding it better to have a laugh about serious news because through humor an audience

Humorists are present through multiple mediums such as talk shows, blog columns, and political cartoons. The different platforms humorists’ use lends different purposes for their content. For example, political cartoon artists have the creative liberty to create offensive content on certain political issues. The political cartoons

Historians and academics offer definitions which underlie today?s humor. In 1937, Walter Blair, whose 60-year study of humor focused on the nineteenth century development of the genre, stated that American humor was neither produced only in America nor contained characteristics privy only to Americans. He offered instead that American humor meant ?humor which is American in that it has an emphatic ?native quality??a quality imparted by its subject matter and its technique? (92). H. R. Haweis, half a century earlier in 1882, had defined the technique of American humor as the three shocks of contrast: business and piety, Aboriginal and Yankee, and the bigness of American nature versus the smallness of

Through the use of adynatons and juxtapositions Daniel O’Brien and M.S. Mason were able to portray the true meaning of the comedian community by explaining the use of political satire and the importance that serves. When comparing the work of the two authors, one notices how the use of the word comedian or comic is prevalent and prevails through the texts in order to talk to one another. They both define this word as someone who is able to poke fun at a given situation no matter where they are located, weather this was school for Bart Sampson or in a holding cell being interrogated by government agents for O’Brien. By poking fun they don’t just mean nice jabs at an opportune moment but they go as far as to mean parodying the whole political

SNL considers the advantage of being able to ridicule people in politics with the use of satire to ultimately persuade audiences

Politics are something that carries a lot of importance in today’s world, as it affects how different groups and countries interact with each other. Recently, the use of satire has been integrated into politics, using the once formal media as entertainment. Hosts are known to make fun of politicians for a variety of different reasons, whether it be petty or not, and use this method to send a message across or just to make people laugh. In Saturday Night Live’s segment, “Celebrity Family Feud: Political Edition”, the performers effectively demonstrate the problem with how politicians avoid answering questions by using parody and sarcasm to further accentuate their point.

There are many things in Time magazines We joked. You decide. the article that shows how different people use their power and what they are trying to achieve. They use an example of politicians try to use their power to influence the general public into getting votes, while the comedians are using their power to mimic and mock things that are incredibly outrageous from these politicians; presidential candidates especially. Looking through the article we see examples and statements of how comedians are viewing the election of 2016 and their personal thoughts behind most of their sketches of the satire nature.

This paper will focus on American and western humor which is a broad range filled with many types of jokes, humorous situations and satire. My basic argument will be that the average American will be more prone to engage in the morally problematic humor that Morreall describes. The basis of my argument is founded on several principles: most Americans are stupid, and finally most Americans are selfish. These statements are critical assessments based on observation and will need to be assumed as truth to understand the distinction I will later make between comedians and everyday Americans. While some may dispute the ‘stupid’ label and claim that it stems from an elitist academic ideology, I believe that there is overwhelming evidence of this

Discussion/ Conclusions: The article states that humor is a tool that serves to enhance the impressions we have on others. Much of the research done on this subject only focuses on how adaptive styles of humor yield positive characteristics for people. In contrast, this article offers that plus information on how maladaptive styles of humor yield negative traits in people.

The event that I and my partner went to was ComedySportz Improv Comedy present by CSzSacramento. CSzSacramento is located on Arden Way in Sacramento, California. They are open Thursday to Friday at 7:30 pm to 10:00 pm. Also, on Saturday at 6:30 pm to 10:00 pm. However, the show that I went to was held on Saturday and start at 7 pm to 8:40 pm. The entrance room was small but relaxing. That room have a few couches, a big white board where I can doodle on, and it is where I can purchase admission tickets and foods. The admission ticket cost $10 for students, seniors, and children and $12 for general admission. The foods they have for sale was popcorn, soda, water, and candy. Popcorn and water are each $1.50 and soda is $2.00. The room after the

In Hoffman and Young’s article, Satire, Punch Lines, and the Nightly News: Untangling Media Effects on Political Participation, Hoffman and Young observes the effects of participating in the observation of both Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert on their individual late night political satire comedy shows. From the article, it is shown that those who may view these late night television shows that focus on political satire, are positively affected by the television shows as well. This supports our idea of just how does satire and comedy effect politics. There is a correlation between the use of satire and politics with political involvement and it appears that it is, overall, positive. What this means is that the use of satire and comedy does in fact assist with political involvement, leading to a better political understanding of current issues within today’s world, as well as current national political issues (Hoffman & Young,

Resistance that exploits the non-seriousness of humour conjures images of bombastic colour and the carnivalesque, from the giant ‘puppets’ of anti-globalisation protests to clowns mocking the Pope. Yet as Barry Sanders suggests in his musing that, ‘play is so basic to animals – humans and nonhumans alike – why shouldn’t it inform the very foundations of communication itself?’, the relationship between humour/play and life is fundamental and generative (cited in Shepard 2005, 64). This essay considers that the simultaneously non-seriousness and life-generative nature of humour makes it a particularly effective, and indeed potentially indispensable, tool during micropolitical resistance -- especially in the face of capitalism’s intimidating