Hybrid Software Development Methodology : Business Technology Consulting

Agile Project management is one of the industries dominating methodology for project management in IT. It is an incremental and iterative way to manage the build and design activities for constructing an IT product, services, and project development in manner which is highly interactive and flexible. In this methodology, scope is defined in granularity that is appropriate with time horizon and checked with the agreement on each feature with the customer. In this methodology work steps are divided with feature breakdown structures. In order to track the progress of the project progress charts are used instead of Gantt charts. Cross-functional and test-driven development teams starts working from the very beginning of the project to provide

Cost and resource needs are higher for traditional than Agile due to Waterfall’s sequential development phase of all requirements determined in the beginning, software design and finally implementation of master design. The need for all information up front takes substantial time to gather and the sequential design does not allow for project changes as the flow enters into the programming stage. With Agile, costs remain low because there exists an incremental and iterative approach to the project, meaning less time is used to collect all requirements up front, the

The preferred methodologies for managing a software’s lifecycle are a major factor in deciding how a firm reacts to market demands. The major SDLC frameworks followed are the waterfall model, Agile methodology (scrum) and Kanban. We will discuss this answer

One of the initial steps in researching a problem is to know exactly what the problem is and compose a problem statement that unambiguously identifies and defines the problem to research. Sekaran (2003) said, “No amount of good research can find solutions to the situation, if the critical issue or the problem to be studied is not clearly pinpointed” (p. 69). The area of research for this paper focuses on software development, in particular, the study of agile software development methodologies and if these methodologies are successful in delivering software on time, within budget, and includes the requested features.

It has been observed that in software development, change is unavoidable and must be accommodated for in the life cycle. A number of alternative process models have been introduced in order to attempt to fix the issues in the Waterfall model. An early modification to the standard Waterfall method introduced prototyping as a feedback and discovery mechanism to identify misunderstandings and omissions early on in the process (Neill, 2004). Other process models attempted to further get rid of the risks of misunderstandings by breaking down projects

In 1970 Winston W. Royce created the “Waterfall Method” which eventually became very popular with managers due to the logical flow from beginning to end. Winston’s original design involved 6 steps; requirements, design, implementation, verification, and maintenance it was later on when people started to customize the design and changed the requirements phase into the idea phase or just split the requirements phase into planning and analysis. As we move into the future the Waterfall method is very popular in software development since it is ridged, systematic, and sequential.

Waterfall development has distinct goals for each phase of development. This case because, due to difficulty of returning to an earlier phase. The model shown here is one of several more or less equivalent alternatives.

In order to be a successful Project Manager, one must know how to go about managing projects successfully. Not every project is the same therefore not every project should be handled the same. A project manager must decipher all factors and determine what is most important, how the project will be handled and then and only then can an appropriate project methodology be selected and implemented. Like the sands thorough the hourglass, so are the days of project management, ever-changing. Not all projects will fit into just one methodology that’s why there are literally dozens of methodology practices to choose from, this paper will detail five of those options: Adaptive Project Framework, Crystal Methods, Joint Application Development (JAD), Projects IN Controlled Environments (PRINCE2) and Waterfall (Project n.d.). Cavemen evolved over time to meet the challenges faced before them, project management methodology has done the same. It has evolved from the fixed rigid models to a more adaptive model that ebbs and flows with the project needs. Just like a project has to start somewhere, we will start with Adaptive Project Framework.

There are many ways to develop software. A very popular and preferred method of software development today is the Agile development methodology. One of the original development methods is the Waterfall method. When comparing the two software development methods, Agile fluid process are preferred to the rigid traditional Waterfall development methodology’s created back when computers were very large physical behemoths, taking up entire rooms.

The Agile (“Manifesto”) Software Methodology approach was developed in the early 90s to counter many of the shortcomings of Waterfall. According to the authors of the Agile Manifesto: “We are uncovering better ways of developing software by doing it and helping others do it. Through this work we have come to value:

An integral part of ensuring that any organization runs smoothly, is ensuring that they have the proper software necessary to perform daily functions effectively and efficiently. No two-software developed will ever be the same, and the same goes for its updates. This leads me to my next point which is, since software programs are developed to meet the different needs of different organizations, it is difficult, better yet nearly impossible for there to be just one type of method for software development. Thus, software development can take form in using anyone of the three categories. There is the Rainfall method (also referred to as the traditional method), the Agile, and the Hybrid. This paper will feature the comparisons of two

As the world keeps evolving day by day, technology has become an essential thing in our daily lives. Many tech-companies have been established due to huge expectation from people who are always enthusiastic about new inventions. However, not so many companies could survive in very competitive markets like PC computing, software, hardware, etc. In the early 1990s, as PC computing began to proliferate in the industry, software development faced a crisis. Expected estimated the time for a startup business to have a shippable application in production was about three years. This was even worse when it came to others area in the industry. For example, in aerospace and defense, the average time for a typical complex project could easily be more than 20 years. As a result, many projects ended up being cancelled in the middle of the development phase. Some were complete but did not meet all the business’s current needs. Conclusively, project management is the primary cause for those failures. Fortunately, the agile process management has been established from a small group of software leaders to solve the management issue. Agile is a set of development methods which promotes adaptive planning, early delivery. Not only that, it also encourages rapid and flexible responses to requirements changes at any phase of the development process. It is true to say that agile process has given companies, businesses a more sophisticated

The following paper will explore project management as it relates to budget, time and user requirements. These are all important aspects to be aware of when developing or managing software projects. There are various online resources available to give guidance on how to properly meet these requirements. Budget is met in various ways and after considering many factors. These include failure to recognize cost for resources used on the project, not leaving room for the unexpected, and not continuously monitoring cost throughout the project. Time is influences by elements such as unrealistic budgets, improper planning, and unknowledgeable staff. These are all variables that if not considered can cause a project to fail. Understanding user

A software project is capable of becoming a monster of missed schedules, blown budgets and flawed products”. An approach to achieve meaningful deductions in software costs is to acquire an existing software system as opposed to creating another particular case. Often, though, the available software systems will not provide an exact fit for the problem at hand. Software that solves a same problem might be available, but such software may need to be modified in some way before it can be reused. These changes may involve restructuring the software. As the software is enhanced, modified and adapted to new requirements, the complexity increases and

I selected this topic because it is vital to anyone who wants to develop software to understand the various types of software development models. Software development models guide developers from start to finish for any given project. They encompass areas of development such as research, planning, design, coding, testing, setup, and maintenance (Liviu, 2014, pg.39-40). Various software models exist so it is also important for developers to know how to select the proper one that will be the most effective for their particular project. Although many models exist, for this review I will focus on two of the most commonly used software development models, which are the waterfall model, and the incremental model. HOW EACH MODEL WORKS. In this