Hyperglobalist And Transformationist Perspective Of Globalization

Globalization is one of the most discussed and controversial terms in modern history, while many people believe free trade drive global economic growth, create jobs, and lower prices for consumers. Contrary, others argue global cooperation mainly abuse, underpaid their employees lastly benefits from tax havens. Regardless of someone’s personal view, globalization is an ancient and profound system based on international strategies of which economic, political, and sociocultural relations are interconnected across long geographical boundaries. This Integration occurs as technological advances simplify and facilitated the trading of goods and services, the flow of capital, and migration of people across the globe. Lughod Provides a comparative

Although the first use of the term ‘globalization’ can be traced back to the 1940s, it was only after half a century that this concept stormed the public consciousness. The buzzword ‘globalization’ exploded into the ‘Roaring nineties’ because it captured the increasingly interdependent nature of social life on this planet. Earlier the concept of globalization was viewed as a techo-economic juggernaut spreading western culture and the intellection of capitalism and quashing local beliefs and national traditions. Thus, it was viewed as a ripple of Americanization. One corollary of the propagation of this perspective created fears in the minds of people, who had utter love and affection towards their own culture.

Kofi Annan, a UN diplomat, once said,“...that arguing against globalization is like arguing against the laws of gravity.” He is undoubtedly correct in this assessment. Indeed, globalization is no longer something to be skeptical of, it is very real and is changing our world exponentially. The affects of globalization, however, continue to be a heated topic for debate. Proponents praise the overall economic lift provided by free trade, the diffusion of cultures, and the spread of democracy and capitalism. Critics cry foul at the loss of national identity, the accelerated and uncontrolled use of natural resources, and the redistribution of wealth into the hands of a few very powerful people and corporations. Globalization is a

After we understand the meaning of globalization, we need to figure out what is the phase of globalization, especially the third phase of globalization. According to Friedman (2006), he mentioned that, there have been three great ears of globalization. The first lasted from 1492-when Columbus set sail, opening trade between the Old World and the New World-until around 1800.1 would call this era Globalization 1.0. During the Globalization 1.0, the countries and governments were influenced by religions and Empire hegemonies, they used

Globalization has recently become one of the words which define our aera. So what does globalization mean? When writing this book the author M. Steger must have come across many challenges associated with writing. The term globalization describes a number of accelerating economic, cultural, political, and historical and many other processes which are dramatically quickly changing our society. Many writers who are trying the explain globalization focus mostly of one aspect of the term. However, globalization is a set of interconnected social processes and the author Steger has realized it. Therefore he explains many aspects in order to keep his readers constantly aware of the cooperation between the individual processes which are responsible for globalization as a concept.

Globalization is the process by which the world is interconnected through technology and powerful infrastructure for the purpose of communicating and managing resources. Globalization seems to talk about several vibrant phenomena(s) which ensure two major components.

To begin, globalization is a process of nations, corporations, and individuals moving from a national level to an international level. James Rosenau states, "Globalization seems appropriate to denote the something that is changing humankind's preoccupation with territoriality and traditional arrangements of the state system (Purkitt, 15)." As globalization enters our political, economic, and cultural worlds, it has both costs

Globalization is an expanding, vague term that constantly crosses disciplines. Integral to economics, sociology, psychology, and political science, the term is not rigid, with definitions and uses ranging in department, creating a puzzle within the term. Scholars agree that it is a process that crosses country borders through the sharing and flow of goods, services, economics, culture, technology, and more (Guillen, 2001; Held et al, 1999; Castells, 1996; Kobrin, 1997; Gilpin, 1987). I look at

Globalization is the process whereby which there is integration and interaction amongst people, organizations, companies and governments of different countries. The process of globalization started a long time ago with the initiation of foreign trade with different countries. In recent years due to great advancement in technology, effective communication and better relations Globalization is a very common aspects of businesses, governments and other social segments of society. The process ‘has’ and ‘is’ effected by the social, cultural, economic and political aspects of different countries around the world. According to Thomas Friedman, globalization today is “farther, faster, cheaper, and deeper.”

One of the key processes of the world economy at the turn of XX-XXI centuries is progressing globalization, i.e. a qualitatively new stage in the development of the internationalization of economic life. Ambiguous attitude towards globalization, and sometimes diametrically opposed. Some see it as a threat to the world economy, and other means of further progress. But to begin to talk about the positive and negative features of globalization, the first thing we should do is to understand what globalization is? What are its main characteristics? How it manifests itself in the modern world?

Globalization as an idea has been developed as a part of both constructive and adverse route by diverse individuals in unique circumstances. Everybody takes a look at the idea from his or her perspective and hobbies. On the other hand, there is an understanding among all academics that globalization has had a tremendous effect on social orders on economic, political, and social levels. From the writing on globalization, it appears as though everything is globalizing in this world as a consequence of the change of the world to a little town, a worldwide town. This implies fringes are not any more unusual obstructions to any sort of association furthermore, mix between countries. It is contended in the writing that such effect of

Globalization is the procedure in which individuals, thoughts and merchandise spread all through the world, impelling more connection and joining between the world 's societies, governments and economies Globalization includes financial joining; the exchange of strategies over outskirts; the transmission of learning; social steadiness; it is a worldwide procedure, an idea, a revolution and establishment of the worldwide market free from socio-political control. It is the procedure of world shrinkage, of separations getting shorter, things drawing nearer. It relates to the expanding ease with which some person on one side of the world can collaborate, to shared advantage, with some person on the opposite side of the world. Globalization

Globalization, like most phenomenon, is controversial. It is defined as the “increasing cross-border flow of goods, services, money, people, information, and culture” (as cited in Ariely, 2011). Though, it has been around for many years, the extent at which it impacts economies, international relationships, and everyday life has become more profound than ever before. Due to its controversial nature, there have been many critiques of its process. Postcolonial critics have argued that it is merely the latest stage in a long history of oppression and exploitation by Western nations, and that the idea of “global citizenship” is just another way for the West to impose its values on the rest of the world. This is not the first claim to be made against globalization, with many others throwing around claims of “Americanization”, and “global erasing the local”. This is due to the lack of understanding of globalization as not just a historical process, but also a “conceptual change in which people are aware of world as a single place, … [with] an important effect on various types of social identities around the world (as cited in Ariely, 2011). However, this process does not seek to eliminate local, social, or national identities. “Globalization and localization are inseparably linked” (as cited in Sobol, 2016). It creates a symbiotic relationship between the global and the local, where they complement and aid each other. The process of globalization is not the latest stage of oppression by Western countries, but rather “the global integration [that] hastens the worldwide convergence of cultures” (as cited in Sobol, 2016). Globalization is a phenomenon that benefits our world, as it is responsible for the integration of cultures, the rise in economies, and aids in international relationships.

Globalization is a social process independent of man’s will. It is also a dynamic development process with inner contradictions and a dual nature. Although it provides a rare historic opportunity for many countries to develop, it also creates differences, competition and conflicts of interest. Globalization’s contradictions and dual nature also exert a complicated influence on contemporary international relations.

The term globalization had started gaining prominence towards the end of twentieth century. Over the period of time, it has become one of the most discussed phenomenon. It is not about the process of international integration of nations and their economic activities, but as a matter fact, it is way more complex involving other factors like environmental challenges, politics and other socio-cultural aspects.