The authors are criticizing two major but different ideas in each book, the hypocrisy of “civilized society” and the individual versus society. Twain really despises the society that surrounds Huck. For example the judge allows Pap to keep custody of Huck. This shows hypocrisy because while the judge is supposed to be doing what benefits Huck by keeping him safe, he is giving Pap, a drunken father, the right to custody over Huck. The author criticizes the judge because, back then, the right to property was put before the welfare and freedom of a person. This can also be compared to how black people were mistreated, because they were seen as property. The freedom of these slaves weren't a priority because they were in fact slaves and shown no …show more content…
To summarize Twain is criticizing the fact that instead of maintaining the collective welfare, the society is being selfish and demonstrating a lack of morals. In Romeo and Juliet, the two main characters struggle against public and social institutions that earlier are for or against the existence of their love. With parents who did not approve of their love, the two had to rebel against their families in order to be with each other. The situation Juliet had found herself in will not be considered an easy one. Coming from an inherent of the Renaissance family, the father had a big amount of control over the family's actions and the family members, especially women. Juliet’s father wanted her to marry a man held highly in their society in such a short period of time, this made her situation very compromising. Also, because they uphold the traditions of Christianity, the two lovers had to wait to get married before consummating their love, a love that is so powerful, Juliet calls Romeo “the god of my idolatry.”
Huck always disliked Miss Watson, but now that this society voice plays a part in Huck?s judgment his views are changed. This society views allows Huck to see Jim, a friend, only as a slave and Miss Watson, almost a foe in his young views, as a dear friend. Twain is showing the reader the gross injustices of slavery in this little incident, as well as his moral opposition to slavery. Twain wants the reader to see how slavery ideology changed people, even those who didn?t understand it fully. Twain wants the reader to see how unfair slavery was in how it could even change Huck?s thinking, whom the reader had never before seen voice ill conceptions about black people. When Huck?s mind can be so radically changed to such opposing ideas and morals, the reader sees these horrors plainly and knows Twain?s opposition to slavery is right.
This quote shows how ignorant Huck really is, not only using racial slurs which was deemed okay by a majority of society during that time period and not even realizing how contradicting it is to say what he said. Twain's take on law vs morality is put to the test and Huck makes a lot of...choices because it's not in my place to say what is right and what is wrong. However it can be said that Huck does have some morals which is why he is seen as more appealing, because Huck debated whether or not to give Jim up just for an easy buck, but Huck made the right choice by deciding not to do so. Twain pushes Huck to utterly
Similarly, another display of faulty logic would be when the new judge rules that Huck should be in Paps custody, despite Pap’s history of alcoholism and abuse. These events and moral misjudgments serve to make up the society that Huck inhabits. The message that Twain is expressing with this kind of atmosphere is that, no matter how “civilized” a society might claim itself to be, it cannot be civilized or just so long as it enacts the practice of slavery. When terrible acts of injustice go unpunished but minor offenses result in execution, the society cannot be just.
In the novel, Adventures of Huckleberry Finn by Mark Twain, Twain uses irony, sarcasm, and satire to show that slavery and racial discrimination are morally wrong and that people shouldn’t be treated differently because of their ethnicity and race. Twain’s use of irony and ridicule exposes and criticizes the society’s viewpoints of what is right and wrong in contrast of Huck’s conscience and his experience on the journey with Jim to come to find what he believes is right or wrong. While writing the novel, Twain was living in a society where racial tensions and discrimination had a great impact during these times. Twain illustrates the stupidity of slavery and racial discrimination by mocking many different aspects of the society in which Huck grew up in. Throughout Huck’s and Jim’s adventurous journey down the river,
At the start of the novel Huck is forced to go back to his abusive father,Pap, because the new judge value’s Pap’s rights over Huck’s well being. This is ironic because at this point in the novel Huck believes that slavery is morally sound, but still resents the judge for infringing upon his rights and taking him from Miss Watson. Twain alludes to the callowness of the law enforcement by relaying a conversation between two officers regarding a steam boat accident. The officers are informed of the steam boat accident, ask if anyone is injured, and upon hearing that only a slave died are relieved that no one was hurt. The sense of irony that Twain surrounds the law with shows that the law within the south was useless, and could not control or instill a strong moral code within
Throughout the book, Twain uses various themes such as social ostracism to comment on human nature and its role in shaping society. Sometimes mainstream society is not as right and moral as it believes, and when individuals try to justify it they push away their own humanity. Twain demonstrates this through the various lifestyles, comparing the intellects and beliefs of different social classes, and Huck’s conforming
Twain’s larger purpose here is to criticize the society and the beliefs it holds, because blaming something bad on luck and not being strong enough to take credit for the incident is cowardly and needs to be changed.
Natalie Myren Thesis: In Mark Twain’s Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, Huck, the protagonist, is confronted with a multitude of moral choices that lead him to challenge the ‘sivilised’ morals and nature of his society. Huck’s attitude towards adult characters as they attempt to educate him demonstrates how Twain is critical of the superficiality and hypocrisy of adult moral standards within society. Twain uses Huck’s interactions with the Widow Douglas and Miss Watson to demonstrate how Huck is unable to independently develop as people that reflect society’s superficial standards influence Huck through the enforcement of their lifestyles upon him.
“Americans are so enamored of equality that they would rather be equal in slavery than unequal in freedom (Alexis de Tocqueville).” Throughout the Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, Mark Twain uses satire, setting, and symbols to show the lawlessness and slavery in south. Twain depicts in the novel that while, people are still breaking natural laws like Slavery the laws of the land can never be abided by.
Second of all, Twain also shows how southerners act toward their slaves and how racism is normal for them. The whites in the south are horrible to the African Americans, they treat the slaves like dirt. Huck is supprissed when Jim starts to cry about his daughter: “It don’t seem natural, but I reckon it’s so” (Twain 155). Huck was raised to think that African Americans are not human so when Jim cries Huck is surprised. The southerners are so blinded by their racism that they think that only the matter of skin color makes them a superior. The article ¨The Adventures…¨ mentions a State that is trying to enter the union as a slave state: “The furor had begun when Missouri requested to enter the Union as a slave state” (¨The Adventures…¨11). If Missouri is a slave state, then African Americans would not be welcomed. Twain shows the true colors of the white slave owner or owners and how they treat them like crap. The attitudes of the southerners are disgusting because they think that the African Americans are property not people. Twain describes this mental state that the slaves are not human through Tom’s aunt: “‘Well, it’s Lucky; because sometimes people do get hurt’” (Twain 221). Tom’s aunt is only concerned about Huck because he is white but she could care less about any slave.
The novel conveys the civilized way of life in the Southern States, where African Americans are viewed as slaves, without any logic and emotions. By communicating, Huck is obeying his own moral compass and helping Jim to escape, he points out society’s flaws, lack of morality and education about civilization, racist lifestyle. For him to satirize the South’s living standards and lifestyle, Mark Twain speaks up and supports African American’s human rights and freedoms, which probably led African Americans and later women to fight for their political (voting rights, public offices), social (role in society), and economical (equal job wages)
Shakespeare understood that with young love came rebellion, (which upon Juliet’s marriage to Paris being advanced ahead of time), made the lovers more determined to defy their scorning families and the chain of being. Had their families ceased their feud and with time, let their children get to personally know each other, their young love might’ve extended into true love. Shakespeare presents the complexities and faults with young love in the play with rebellion and time as catalysts in their downfall, suggesting a negative view of the human nature.
I’d like to address the way twain criticises the society in the book and the actions Huck make, which isn’t heroic to society.Twain criticises society in this novel through the narrator, Huck, in which is an outsider who views society from the outside looking in and with almost constant bewilderment. Being young and isolated in society as the son of a non successful drunkard (but the Widow Douglas does try to give him a helping hand), he emits a trait of innocence which gradually leads him to question society's frame. He relates events and characters as he encounters them, simply and clearly, and this causes him to present a picture of social hypocrisy, prejudice and violence. Due to his youthful innocence he isn't always able to grasp
Mark Twain, in his writing of “Advice to Youth,” reveals what he believes to be relevant instruction to guide the youth to success. These statements in regard to who he’s speaking to is are as pertinent today as it was in 1882 when the speech was given. This didactic oratory, as it was written to the young, is expressed in the vernacular which allows for a sense of relation from Twain to those he’s speaking to. In addressing this advice, Twain uses several literary techniques including satire, diction, and hyperbole among several others. Specifically used by Twain is Juvenalian satire which bitterly and ironically criticizes society, in this case how children are raised to think and act.
Consequently, “it is appropriate that his spokesman, Satan, who is beyond good and the evil, beyond pain and happiness, should sneer at Moral Sense” (Parsons). Although it is possible this was a factor in Twain’s judgement that society in general is dissolute, the way in which he approaches this proves he is not submitting to the opinion that this is okay. Again, the reader must refer back to Twain’s original “Notice” before the novel where he reminds the reader to read beyond the surface. In this case, he wants the reader to understand that the irony he repeatedly emphasizes between what the community encourages and what is humanely the right thing for Huck to do is meant to condemn the neglectfully fraudulent ways of society, definitely not to allow them as this opinion suggests. Because of this, the anomalous nature of these decisions made by Huck and how his society would react to them bring up many questions regarding what the reader themselves has been brought up to believe which was indubitably Twain’s