The International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) are a set of uniform, principle based standards that, in theory are applied consistently by companies in adopting countries. (Hail et al, 2006). Proponents and standard setters assert that IFRS adoption will produce a number of benefits including improved financial reporting and transparency, international comparisons, market efficiency, cross national information flows and global integration of local firms. (Gornik-Tomaszewski and S Showerman, 2010). There are other schools of thought which also have strong arguments against the adoption of IFRS. These arguments include that IFRS will not bring true comparability, that the IFRS will not be suitable for other countries, that …show more content…
Empirical studies support this argument and provide evidence that better disclosures reduce information asymmetry and increase market liquidity (Healy et al;1999;Leuz and Verrecchia, 2000;Bushee and Leuz,2005. In addition, better reporting and disclosure can affect the cost of capital. First, there is the notion that investors require a higher return from less liquid securities, which is in essence a liquidity premium (Chordia et al., 2000). Better disclosure can also lower investors’ estimation risks, that is, make it easier for investors to estimate firms’ future cash flows. This effect can directly reduce the required rate of return of an individual security as well as the market risk premium of the entire economy ( Lambert et al., 2007). Better disclosure can also improve risk sharing in the economy, either by making investors aware of certain securities or by making them more willing to hold them, which again reduces the cost of capital (Merton, 1987; Diamond and Verrecchia, 1991). Empirical studies generally support a link 2 between reporting or disclosure quality and firms’ costs of capital (Botosan and Plumlee, 2002; Hail and Leuz, 2006), IFRS and cross border investment Differences in the accounting standards are also viewed as an impediment to cross-border investment (Aggarwal et al., 2005). Thus, the global movement towards IFRS reporting may facilitate
Before deciding to fully adopt IFRSS, in 1996, the AASB issued Policy Statement 6 International Harmonization Policy with objective to ‘pursue the
IFRS’s are a single set of accounting standards at a global level for all sectors. Accounting standards are trustworthy statements is the reflection of financial statements to be presented to the stakeholders . United kingdom has already adopted IFRS since 2005.I would be discussing on adoption of IFRS by United kingdom for this paper. The United
In a situation where the investors are very certain that company A’s cash flow will be closer to what their value expectations will be. The result of their actions in trusting company A will drive the stock prices up in the company. As a result, company A stocks will definitely be higher than company B.
The U.S is moving toward IFRS (Forgeas, 2008). In the near future, all US company may need to report financial statements under IFRS. This makes the adaptation of IFRS unavoidable. Recently, some large multinational
Mullainathan, S., & Shleifer, A. (2005). Market for News. American Economic Review, Vol. 95 ,
There will be more applicability and flexibility in the implementation of the IFRS as it is principled based (Paul & Burks, 2008).
In theory, the reason is that these investments are more difficult to sell to clients.
Still in flux: Future of IFRS in U.S. remains unclear after SEC report. (n.d.). Retrieved January 16, 2015, from http://www.journalofaccountancy.com/Issues/2012/Sep/20126059.htm
* We assume the cost of capital to be a stated annual rate to facilitate calculations;
of a firm; therefore their decisions play a large role in the cost of capital calculation.
a) Weighting of Capital Structure: Use of book values of capital rather than the market values
On February 24, the SEC unanimously agreed to publish a statement of continued support for a single set of high-quality global accounting standards. The SEC acknowledged that IFRS is best positioned to be the global standard. Even without a set conversion timeline from the SEC, IFRS has been affecting
It takes into account not only market risk but also the other risks like liquidity risk, political risk, credit risk and operational risks.
IFRS addresses practical application issues that any entity is supposed and expected to encounter within the standards. These practical issues provide a comprehensive analysis. For instance, IFRS 1 provides extensive guidelines “…and addresses practical application issues that a first-time adopter of IFRSs could expect to encounter when transitioning to IFRSs”. (KPMG, 2009). The IFRS, being principle-based, generally do not contradict with Generally Accepted
In their research study, Souder & Myles (2010) identify that risk is chiefly fundamental to investing. Böhringer & Löschel (2008) further add that there is no discussion of returns or performance that is deemed meaningful in the absence of at least some mention of the involved risk. However, the trouble for investors, who have just entered into the marketplace, involves the process of figuring where risk really lies, as well as what the difference between the various levels of risks. Relating to the manner, in which risk is fundamental to investments, a significant number of new