IV Therapy Complications

It can also occur during blood transfusion or during dressing change. The insertion of central catheters can occur in the Interventional Radiology or sometimes at the bedside. Regardless of the where the insertion process occur, a sterile field must always be maintained and sterile techniques must always be employed to prevent any organisms from being introduced to the central line into the patient. According to The Joint Commission (2013), many organizations such as Michigan Keystone Intensive Care Unit Project and Institute for Healthcare Improvement are actually adhering to insertion bundles to reduce the CLABSI rates. The bundles include hand hygiene, maximal barrier precautions, chlorhexidine skin preparation, avoidance of femoral vein, and prompt removal of central catheter. Furuya et al. (2011) studied the effectiveness of the insertion bundle and how it impacts the bloodstream infections for patients in the Intensive Care Unit. As a result, lesser infection have occurred when the compliance is high. As mentioned, the site of the catheter also needs to be considered in the insertion process. Avoiding areas such as the groin to access the femoral artery is recommended because this area can be easily contaminated with urine or feces. In addition, after the insertion of a new central line, all the used IV tubing

Only when it is absolutely necessary should a catheter be inserted into a patient. Every patient is assessed for the need for a Foley catheter. If the Foley is inserted, assessments are also then done daily to see if the need is still valid. If the reason is not justifiable the catheter must be removed from the patient (Joint Commission releases new NPSG for CAUTI, 2011). Nurses must follow guidelines while inserting indwelling catheters as well. Aseptic technique is critical to maintain during this process. The use of sterile equipment and a sterile procedure helps to reduce the risk of CAUTI. If in any way the catheter becomes contaminated during the process of insertion, the nurse should discard of the entire catheter and start with a new, sterile kit. Proper hand hygiene is very important before and after contact with indwelling catheters to decrease risk of infection. Maintenance of a close drainage is system is also important that way bacteria are not able to get in and cause infection (Revello & Gallo, 2013). Decreasing the number of times Foleys are inserted and how long they stay in for can help reduce the risk of CAUTI since the longer a Foley stays in, the higher the risk of infection becomes. Nurses must keep the catheter line patent, with no kinks to allow urine to flow freely through into the collection bag. When a urine sample must be obtained it must be done in a sterile

Lewis et al. explain in Medical-Surgical Nursing, a central line is a catheter placed into a large blood vessel for a patient who requires frequent or long-term access to the vascular system. The authors explain that catheters are used for the administration of high volume fluids, medications that are irritating (such as chemotherapy), long term pain medication, blood products, parenteral nutrition, and hemodialysis. Kaiser policy states four different types of central line used for patients: Centrally inserted catheters, peripherally inserted catheters, injection implanted ports and hemodialysis catheters. Centrally inserted catheters

Usage of indwelling urinary catheters in critically ill patients can seem to be a permanent fixture in intensive care units. Most critical care nurse expect their patients to have an indwelling urinary catheter (IUC) in place without much regard to the risk of catheter associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI) or the ability to implement IUC alternatives. Critical care patients may require IUC usage due to diagnosis, need for accurate hourly intake and output measurements, or other specified documented reasons. The risk of acquiring a catheter associated urinary tract infections is a result of IUC usage. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Guideline for Prevention of Catheter-associated

Until recently it was not uncommon for patients admitted to an acute care facility to have an indwelling catheter anchored for unnecessary reasons. Patients that came in thru the emergency department typically were sent to the units with unnecessary indwelling catheters in place and it was not unusual for a surgery patient to have an indwelling catheter anchored before or during a procedure. Once a patient was admitted and was transported to the units nursing would also anchor indwelling catheters for multiple unnecessary reasons. These Catheters could be

The procedure was done emergently because of the patient’s critical condition. His right IJ area was prepped in the usual fashion. It was very difficult to visualize his right IJ vein, even though his habitus should have allowed us to do so, but the patient was, I believe, severely intravascularly volume depleted, and his vein was collapsing. I have attempted to access the right internal jugular vein multiple times, both under real-time ultrasound guidance and even later on blindly. I was able to get blood return and hit the vein; however, I was not able to advance the guidewire. I was able to advance it one time and put the catheter in, and it was nonfunctioning. I had to take the catheter out and tried multiple other times on the right IJ vein without success. That procedure was terminated. Pressure was applied. There was no cervical hematoma whatsoever. The patient was uncomfortable because of the length of the procedure but did well otherwise. Hemodynamically, he was unchanged, and his oxygen saturations remained stable.I prepped the IJ vein area in the usual fashion. One percent lidocaine was used for local anesthesia. Again, the left IJ vein was collapsing. With deep inspiration, the vein could be well visualized on the real-time and ultrasound guidance, after which I could get access to the left IJ vein. A wire was advanced without difficulty while the

PICCs lines have become well recognized as reliable central venous access devices (VADs), with lower potential for complications than short-term central venous catheters. PICCs first gained popularity in the 1980s, and their use has grown steadily since then. They were initially popular in many parts of the United States due to the need for venous access in home care patients. They have grown in popularity because of their reduction in potential complications and costs compared with short-term central venous catheters, and because PICCs can be inserted by registered nurses who have been trained in the procedure.

Conducted over a 108-day span at the Hospital Clinico ‘San Carlos,’ a university hospital in Madrid, Spain, this randomized controlled trial evaluated both open and closed safety PIVCs, replacing the PIVC only as clinically indicated. Qualifying patients were 18 years of age or older, had a clinically planned PIVC (non-emergent), no other peripheral or central lines, and a temperature less than 38C. The sample included 1200 catheters to eliminate possible effects of IV insertion learning curves. Random computer selection generated the sample group into closed-system (COS) PIVCs and those with open-system (MOS) PIVCs. (Lopez et al., 2014)

IV therapy is used because it is fast acting, works effectively and if there are any side effects then the treatment can be stopped instantly (Hopkins 1999 p13); (Mallett & Dougherty 2000 p822).

P in the PICOT is patients with Foley catheter inserted at admission causing patients catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI). The aim is to build a nurse-driven protocol to remove Foley catheters early on will help reduce additional days of having the use of an unnecessary indwelling urinary catheter. For every extra day, a Foley catheter increases the risk to develop hospital-acquired catheter-associated infections in our patients ("AACN Competencies and Curricular Expectations for CNL Education & Practice,"

Pt requires 20 gauge IV for _______. 20 gauge catheter inserted to the right anterior forearm, first attempt. Flushed with 10 cc normal saline. Stat lock in place, covered with transparent dressing. Pt tolerated well with no complaints of pain or irritation upon flushing, no visible swelling or bruising. Sharps placed in approved container, patient’s bed lowered as far as possible and assisted to comfortable position. Reassessed in 5 minutes for bleeding , none noted.

Intravenous (IV) fluids were bolusing; however, when blood pressure was only obtainable manually and revealed that her blood pressure was 74/34, the decision was made to send the patient to the intensive care unit (ICU). There, coagulation studies revealed an elevated PT, PTT, D-dimer, and a decreased fibrinogen count. She received a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC), a transfusion of two units of packed red blood cells (PRBCs), as well as cryoprecipitate therapy during her treatment in the ICU.

Peripheral IV catheterization is a painful and potentially anxiety-provoking procedure for the patients. The interventions to reduce the pain caused by venipuncture were explored in the past decades (Oman, 2014). The majority of the studies reviewed in this summary included one level 1 evidence of meta-analyses (Oman, 2014), three level 2 evidences of randomized controlled trials (Beck, 2011; Deguzman, 2012; Kahre, 2011) and one level 3 evidence of controlled trials without randomization (Levitt , 2013). Many studies have demonstrated that 1% lidocaine intradermal injection before IV insertion can reduce the pain significantly (Oman, 2014). Kahre and his colleagues’ study indicated bacteriostatic normal saline (BNS) group had lower pain score

Brusch says, “Once a indwelling catheter is placed, the daily incidence of bacteriuria can be between 3-10%.” Another large problem that results CAUTI’s is that at times, catheters are left in a patient longer than necessary. Prolonged use of

The use of intravenous therapy in the hospitals is now considered a routine therapy. In 2016, DeVries and Valentine stated that 70% to 80% of hospital patients have peripheral intravenous lines at some time during their stay. A peripheral intravenous (PIV) line is a small hollow tube (catheter) that is inserted into a vein and can be connected to special tubing. PIV line is commonly used to administer medications or fluids directly into the vein. The article “Intravenous Therapy: A Review of Complications and Economic Considerations of Peripheral Access,” states that the history of intravenous (IV) therapy dates back to the Middle Ages. Dr. Thomas Latta pioneered the use of IV saline infusion during the cholera epidemic and in the 20th century, two world wars established a role for IV therapy as routine medical practice (Dychter, Gold, Carson, & Haller, 2012).