EXTENDED ESSAY
BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT
RESEARCH QUESTION:
“How effective would the takeover of Motorola mobility be for Google as a growth strategy?”
Candidate name:
Candidate number:
School name:
School number:
Supervisor:
Date submitted:
Word count:
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS.
I would like to thank my extended essay supervisor for her continuous support throughout this assignment. Her guidance and patience have been of great help to me in completing this task.
I would also like to thank my family and friends for their endless support and for always providing me with the encouragement to continue working when times were difficult.
ABSTRACT.
In August of 2011, Google announced that it would take over Motorola mobility in an
…show more content…
However over the years Google has managed to grow into one of the largest public limited companies as they now have various products apart from the search engine. Google has its own web browser known as Google Chrome, it had acquired YouTube in the year 2006 and it has many other services in its portfolio. However there is one recent development that Google has produced which has taken the world by surprise i.e. ANDROID. This is Google’s own operating system for mobile phones.
THE TAKEOVER.
After having briefly introduced the relevant companies, I shall now talk about the merger. The world is increasingly becoming dependent upon quick communication for almost all issues related to life. This is true for the business world as well. The emergence of smartphones has almost sufficiently satisfied the people’s needs mentioned above. One of the very successful operating systems for these smartphones is the android and the breaking news of Google taking over Motorola has caused great speculation that the entire technological universe of communication could be dominated by Google. However there are some eye brows raised questioning whether the takeover was worth 12.5 billion USD5 given that the situation of Motorola mobility is not too favourable. These different opinions are what led me to carry out a research on “how effective would the takeover of Motorola mobility be for Google?”
OBJECTIVE.
The main objective of this
Take each bag of popped popcorn and count the individual kernels that did not pop and record the data on the chart. Perform this for each
It is important to pay attention to those manufacturers that are working with android (Not only concentrate marketing activities in apple or RIM), because the potential growth of the Google’s brand could be an opportunity to grow in smart phones sales, increasing the market share.
I would like to thank the following peer reviewers for their excellent input on my essay.
Executive summary Raising smartphone estimates Forecasting smartphones based on TCO Linking our TCO analysis to the addressable market Smartphone volumes to grow at CAGR of 26% Price point work also shows 1.1bn units long term Significant growth being seen in the low end A specific growth opportunity within China LTE could be a game changer Improving device availability LTE speeds could drive new services Coverage expansion of LTE networks Aggressive rollout plans in US and China An upgrade cycle like none before A war of ecosystems….. Apple – the iOS and Mac ecosystem Google/Android – a one trick pony? Windows 8 – what about the upgrade cycle? Developer dynamics are critical Smartphone economics Carriers have seen margin pressure Smartphone economics What can carriers do? Smartphones – winners and losers Apple scope for share gains exist on multiple fronts Samsung – a strong second Nokia – heading for third position in smartphones Multiple Android vendors may struggle HTC – still bleeding share Motorola Mobility/Google – losing steam in the US Sony – change of
HTC’s competitive position is not sustainable. In fact, the disappointing financial performance in Q1 2012 and the increasingly decreasing operating margin all points to a slower growth. Besides the statistics, HTC also face several imminent threats, such as the popularity of Samsung and Apple’s smartphone offering, the increase in competitors in the smartphone market, the shift in market, from operator push to brand pull, and the ongoing patent war with Apple. However there are also opportunities HTC can take advantage of to keep its competitive position. The opportunities are presented in the high growth rate of Smartphone Market, 61% in 2011, and the lack of well made Android Tablet.
It became available on January 5, 2010 and uses the Android open source mobile operating system
Motorola is a global communications leader that is divided into six business units: semiconductor products sector (SPS), broadband communications sector (BCS), integrated electronic systems sector (IESS), commercial, government and industrial solutions sector (CGISS), global telecom solutions sector (GTS), and the personal communications sector (PCS). Motorola was formed in the late 1920’s by two brothers; Paul and Joseph Galvin, since that time the company has undergone numerous changes. Today they are located in about 70 countries and are still one of the top electronic manufacturers.
Yemen G.; Chatterjee S.; &Bougeois III L. (2003). Cisco: Early if not Elegant (A). University of Virginia. Darden Business Publishing.
Today, Google, Inc. is worth more than General Motors, McDonald's and Disney combined, and the company continues to model the way in the global technology industry in which it competes. In fact, the company's name has become a verb and it is common practice for consumers to "Google" what they want to find online. To determine how Google, Inc. reached this dazzling level of performance in a relatively short period of time, this paper provides an analysis of the three external environments in which Google competes, the general environment, the industry environment and the competitor environment. Next, a discussion of two specific strategic issues as well as opportunities and threats that are facing Google, Inc. is followed by a summary of the research and important findings in the conclusion.
The competition of mobile operating systems usage is a huge factor in the United States. Google provides an operating system for mobile smartphones called Android in that case, Apple decides to roll out a mobile operating system for Apple devices called iOS in the same year. The ratio of people using iOS in the United States over Android in the past couple years has been 6 to 1. However, after Google’s improvements and recently new updates to the operating system which is called Lollipop 5.0 has dominated a big percentage of iOS users to use Android based operating system smartphones. (Fact on Android vs iOS) Take another example by Google, they have invented a web browser in which competes with Internet Explorer. Internet Explorer has integrated with Microsoft’s operating system Windows and has been used quite well. On the other hand, Google decided to invent Google Chrome as a competitor to Microsoft’s Internet Explorer. Google’s web browser
Due to the financial downturn and the emergence of new devices in the global handset
EV: Generally, the threat of substitutes is low in the smartphone industry as there are not definite products that can readily substitute the smartphone. Consumers rely heavily on Smartphone and would not be able to find a close substitute that has all the function of a mobile phone. Furthermore, Nokia is a long and established company with many loyal customers. These people may continue to stay faithful to Nokia and are hence less resistant to change. Also, the perceived level of product
After researching Motorola one of the most delightful things that I discovered is that the biggest opportunity is their wide range of products that are well placed in the market, when the military has a need Motorola is here, when public safety has a need Motorola is there as well as the general population. Also understanding the fact that they have a very strong promotional strategy, by using different tools they tempt their customers towards an exciting era of innovation. The fact that Motorola has been involved in the venture of
Motorola, famous amongst mobile phones, and one of the top cellular phone companies in the world till late 1990, later it was captured by the company Nokia. While writing this case we have thrown light on the challenges and problems faced by Motorola around 2006-2007. One of the ideas incorporated in order to recapture the market in the year 2006 was to slash the prices of almost all the cell phones which impacted the returns of the company. Motorola did announce in the year 2007 that they will revive shortly and would have the market share back.
Apple and Samsung are the major competitors in the smartphone field. We would, like to discuss why they’re leading and conclude which one is better. In the electronic industry these two companies fight are considered as the highest massive ever. They mainly clash for brand image and brand reputation but any consequences regarding this fight, the impact should be faced by both these companies in terms of brand reputation loss and also the loss of huge amount of money over the litigations We would like to discuss the following,