Ice-Fili Swot Analysis

Since their biggest competitor is a foreign entity (Nestle) who uses western manufacturing practices and ingredients, one strategy may be to market heavily on the merits of all-natural ingredients. They have already joined an association which promotes domestic producers over foreign producers and should further capitalize on the gains made by this association. Substitution: Since one of the highest threats in the industry is the threat of substitution, Ice-Fili could look to diversify their offerings. This could mean producing a wider variety of food products, or it could mean selling/renting out unused capacity, particularly cold storage capacity, to other industries. Buyer Power: In order to mitigate the bargaining power of buyers, Ice-Fili may consider shifting a larger portion of their sales to direct-to-consumer channels as well as creating exclusive agreements with resellers. In addition, they could focus their marketing efforts on building brand loyalty. For products for which they aren’t able to secure licensing, such as Lakomka, they could rebrand it as “The Original” Lakomka or something similar that capitalizes on the longstanding popularity of the product. New Entrants: To combat the threat of new entrants, Ice-Fili should continue to focus on developing more efficient ways to produce ice-cream as well as the maturation of their distribution channels. If they are able to further add to

My current product is a variation of ice cream flavours, it is sold in store and can be also taken home if the consumers want it to be. There are many different flavours that can come in a tub, cone, or a bowl.

Ice-Fili is a Russian company which implied that the company knows very well how customers behave and buy. So, the company can easily fit with the Russian demand (i.e. recipe)

To achieve that Ice-Fili will highlight its main asset: the fact that their ice creams are made using only natural products. This corresponds perfectly to the needs of Russian consumers and this is a very differentiating element with respect to its competitors.

This is turning out to be the new generation of producing ice cream and still be able to satisfy customer needs. According to the director of marketing at Blue Bell Carl Breed, “We plan to go after the low carb and Hispanic influence market. But we will continue to provide fabulous tasting ice cream, that appeal to almost every customers and we will never lose sight of the fact that ice cream is supposed to

The Pillsbury Cookie Challenge is a case study written by Natalie Mauro under the supervision of Professor Allison Johnson. The case study creates an open discussion about what the marketing manager of the refrigerated baked goods category for Canada General Mills should do to revive his products. Ivan Guillen, the marketing manager, was faced with tough challenges. He was initially “…faced with the challenge of developing a strategy that would lead to improved business performance on his category” (Johnson and Mauro, p.1, 2011). To clarify, Guillen’s category is refrigerated baked goods (RBG), which means, this category is his marketing responsibility. The issue here is that “RBG was GMCC’s fourth largest category, and its performance over the past two years had been less than stellar” (Johnson and Mauro, p.1, 2011). It is important to note that GMCC stands for General Mills Canada Corporation. Pillsbury has enjoyed majority market share in the RBG category in Canada, however, recently, the market was experiencing only moderate growth. Guillen was disappointed that their goal of 5%-7% market growth was not being achieved mainly in the refrigerated cookie dough segment. To be exact, their volume growth for two years was flat and they were having difficulty reaching new households. There was a shift among consumer’s purchases, which Guillen was challenged to figure out why.

Ice-Fili is the top ice cream producer in Russia. Currently, the company is experiencing tough competition with Nestle, Baskin-Robbins and regional ice cream producers. Its loss in market share due to their poor quality decisions-making after Russia became an open marketing in 1992. Nestle took great advantage of Ice-Fili’s low reaction adjustment and is taking over their market.

Ice-Fili’s marketing approach and product distribution could be seen as weaknesses in the company’s primary activities. In 2001 the firm started its first TV marketing campaign years after competitor’s advertised through the media outlets. To date Ice-Fili is still very inexperienced and far lacking of marketing strategies deployed by Western competitors such as Unilever and Nestle. Not only does Ice-Fili need to market more fiercely against competitors within industry, it must also compete against other consumables such as beverages and snacks. Another weakness is the distribution that is handed over to several distribution companies. There is a much higher chance (twice as likely) to find products of its biggest competitor Nestlé than those of Ice-Fili. Another detriment is how ice cream is viewed socially. Currently ice cream is primarily an impulse purchase. If Ice-Fili can change this outlook, it would result in an enormous

Frozen food division (FFD) is the key contributor to Giant Consumer Product 's (GCP) profits which have successfully grown over the past 30 years. The company has two main products lines, Italian frozen dinner “ DinardoTM”, and organic frozen foods “Natural mealsTM ”. However, recently FFD has encountered a shortfall in sales volume and

Ice-Fili is a famous and one of the oldest ice-cream producers in Russia. Ice-Fili produces ice cream generally loved by consumers because its products contain 15% milk fat, compared to 10% found in the western ice cream. Ice-Fili traditional method of production adds to the unique flavor of its product. Typically, the company produces ice cream with natural ingredients with no preservatives making million of foreigners to consider Russian ice cream to be best in the world. In 2002, Ice-Fili engaged in an aggressive unique product offering, and the company offered up to 170 different kind of ice-cream products, and the company adds other

There are many pros to this offer. Unilever is the largest ice cream producer in the world and like Dreyer’s, already has an extensive distribution network and extensive knowledge of the market. With an offer of $36 (cash), Unilever had by far the best looking offer on paper. They also have a market capitalization of $18 billion and can provide the financial backing that Ben & Jerry’s needs. On the other hand, there are a large number of cons and a huge amount of risk. B & J would have to give up a great deal and essentially “sell its soul” if it were to accept this offer. Unilever has no intention of keeping with B & J’s corporate vision and practices of social responsibility which made B & J a household name in the first place. Unilever is a much larger and more diversified corporation than the others and simply won’t be able to put in the “t.l.c” into the product that Ben & Jerry’s has built their reputation around. As a result, brand loyalty will drop significantly as will B & J’s value. If Unilever were to adhere to B & J’s social charter this would be a much more attractive offer.

Goals- Dippin’ Dots want to be able to expand where they can sell their product. Since retail locations can only offer the product at 10 to 20° below zero, special storage and serving freezers are required, as well as specially designed cryogenic transport containers in order to move the product. This as well as other factors have limited the distribution of Dippin’ Dots to only serve the away from home segment of the ice cream market, which accounts for $13.9 billion. If they can expand where they sell their product, they can increase sales and gain a large portion of the market.

Another option for Cowgirl Creamery is to launch a new brand of cheeses dedicated to another market. This strategy would likely see the biggest return at the grocery stores and other retailers that they sell to. The products that Cowgirl Creamery currently produces are sold to a very specific segment of consumers, cheese connoisseurs. By launching a product more geared toward the average shopper rather than the specialty consumer, Cowgirl Creamery could greatly increase the consumption of their products. The drawback to this option requires cost cutting in other areas to develop a new products because Cowgirl Creamery currently cannot secure bank loans. Cutting segments of their product line to make this an option could sway some consumers to Cowgirl Creamery’s competitors. Closing their own retail stores would also provide additional revenue, although, it may also reduce the products relevance in the market without their own retail store. Even if launching a new brand was affordable, this strategy would also require a supplemental strategy to increase the likelihood of success. In addition to launching a new brand, this approach should be combined with including new features to maximize the success of a new brand.

At the beginning, this market segment represents about 30% of the total potential sales. In the current years, there are few ice-cream produces on the markets that are designed for this segment, because of there are increasing group of consumer in this segment are more concerned and aware of the implications of diet on their health. Most of there consumers do not buy ice=cream as a consequence, such as they thought ice-cream have high calories and not good for

According to What is SWOT Anlysis (2011), SWOT analysis is an analysis used to identify the internal factors (strengths and weaknesses) of the company as well as external factors (opportunities and threats) of the company.