Id NYC Case

This is no surprise due to the major expansion that CC took on in 2001. Lastly, the long term debt to capitalization ratio slowly decreases which is just showing how CC is not being risky with their capital through debt.

There is no doubt that the attacks on 9/11 caused Congress to pass the Real ID Act in order to prevent foreign nationals from fraudulently obtaining a U.S. driver’s license. Congress said the Real ID Act is about security, not stigmas. The law was intended to set principles for states that issue licenses and to procure acceptable documents. However, due to budgets, there are not enough resources to verify the accuracy of these documents from foreign countries. This is based solely on three 9/11 hijackers being able to obtain state identification cards while using fictitious documents. In total, thirty three hijackers acquired state driver’s licenses. Unfortunately, stern stipulations have gradually decreased due to several states and local governments allowing Identification cards to be issued without distinguishing from an authentic driver’s license (Jeunesse, 2015).

Whether protecting and expanding voting rights through permitting more valid vote identifications is a controversial topic during the presidential election of 2016. Many people believe that the current voter ID law makes young, women, minority groups, and seniors hard to access to the ballot box, and thus, should be revised to broaden lists of acceptable forms of voter ID. On the other hand, the supporters of the Voter ID law argue that the law is effective to eliminate undocumented immigrants and noncitizens to make a fraud when voting. Janell Ross, in her article “Hillary Clinton declares war on Voter ID,” uses examples and professional language to demonstrate the negative sides of the Voter ID law in a polished manner. In the article, “Here’s what Donald Trump thinks about Voting,” Zachary Roth uses strong reasons to make a clear argument on the necessity of implementation of the Voter ID law. A valid and persuasive argument should be able to appear to reason, writer’s character, and emotion. Therefore, although Ross and Roth both clearly present their opinions in a professional manner for the audience, they lack validity in providing credible sources to back up some of their ideas.

On 10/28/2015 Officers were called to 2701 S. Cherokee ST. Muskogee, OK in reference to a possible homicide. Officers made contact with the reporting party Elias Quintana, who stated that Jackie Keen had admitted to him that he had killed James Beard.

WOOSTER — Wooster City had authority to remove nearly 50 cats from a Lucca Street property and the animals' owner, currently hospitalized by court-order in another matter, has until Aug. 11 to pay more than $14,000 for upkeep of the cats, which, otherwise, will be turned over to the Wayne County Humane Society.

Youngstown was the industrial heart of Ohio with a thriving steel industry that lasted for several generations. However, Youngstown’s Industry began to deindustrialize in the late 1970s with steel companies moving down to the south of the country. Deindustrialization meant the removal or decline of industry within an area. For example, the steel mills of Youngstown closed and never opened again creating thousands of unemployed workers. It all began with September 19th, 1977, the day that created the domino effect that would create the downfall for the Youngstown’s industry and other steel mills across the mid-west states of Michigan and Indiana. This day, know as Black Monday, was “the beginning of the end” according to Steven High (102). It began with the closing of the Campbell Steel Mill and several months later the four remaining steel mills closed and moved to the south creating the new Sunbelt. As a result, Youngstown became a Rustbelt with a declining population and failing steel industry.

Holder it was determined that times have changed since the 1960’s, yet the new state voting ID laws show how minorities continue to be oppressed by the dominant race. According to states like Alabama, Texas and Mississippi they are enacting these voting ID laws to prevent voter fraud during elections, yet evidence has shown that voting fraud is almost non-existent(The Voting Rights Act: Hard-Won Gains, An Uncertain Future). Also, the states do not take into consideration inequalities that these laws will reveal. These actions made by the states show their unequal treatment towards the minority class because they will be the most affected by these laws. There are a variety of reasons why people would not be able to obtain an ID, the most common one will be financial hardships. It is evident that there is a wage gap in the U.S economy and that minorities earn less than the average white American. It was an unjust decision of the Supreme Court to take away the law that gave them equality and did not require them to make extra prerequisites in order to be able to vote. These regulatory measures are another way to keep these minorities oppressed and ultimately keep the social hierarchy as it is, dominant race at the top and the minorities at the bottom, having to work their way up the social ladder. The supreme court decision was unwarranted due to the knowledge of discrimination still happening in the

Texas’ voter ID law is one of the strictest in the nation. Discriminatory evidence the majority opinion might see is in the list of acceptable forms of identification. There are seven acceptable forms of identification, which includes a handgun license, but not a student ID. This can be seen as discriminatory towards students who possess a student ID, but not one of the forms of identification specified by the voter ID law. On the basis that younger voters tend to lean towards Democratic opinions. Certain Justices of the Court, like Ginsburg, might find this as proof that with the voter ID law, Texas legislatures are trying to refrain from demographic changes of the state. The law is discriminatory against minorities and poor voters in that not all of these individuals have one of the acceptable forms of identification. Accessing one of these forms of identification could be costly and inconvenient. In order to obtain a Texas ID or drivers license, one must visit a DMV. This can be difficult for individuals who live a significant distance from a DMV and those who do not have a

Undocumented immigrants in the United States cannot obtain a driver’s license since they do not have social security cards and other essential identification documents. A few states, however, have enacted laws to permit illegal immigrants to drive on the states’ public roads and highways. Such states, through their Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV), issue driver’s authorization cards (DAC) to these immigrants (Nava par. 1). The policy gives the immigrants driving privilege and helps states to collect more revenues and reduce cases of uninsured motorists. At the moment, Nevada and ten other states and the District of Columbia have enacted laws that permit the issuance of DACs to undocumented immigrants within their borders (“Ten States and DC” par. 1). Most states legislatures, including Florida’s’, are yet to enact laws that allow for the issuance DACs to immigrants in those states. This paper discusses the DAC policy in details and makes recommendations to Florida States’ legislators to adopt the policy in their state.

In this particular case, Hassan v. City of New York, a variety of issues have been raised that intersect with the idea of government surveillance on these Muslim Communities. This case does not utilize a federal or state RFRA, but rather focuses strictly on determining the legal validity of the government surveillance program of Muslim Americans. The Plaintiffs have argued that the NYPD’s government surveillance program has violated the equal protection, establishment, and free exercise freedoms of the constitution. To understand these issues, it is important to examine each of these issues one by one.

Life can be strenuous and arduous. Throughout American history, immigrants have struggled to live equally amongst the rest of society. In 1882, the Chinese Exclusion Act suspended the immigration of all Chinese workers to the United States and barred Chinese immigrants from becoming U.S. citizens. The federal government believed the Chinese threatened the job market in California and disapproved their cultural practices. As a result, Chinese immigrants lost their life, liberty, and property. In 2002, the federal government established the National Security Entry-Exit Registration System (NSEERS) that singled out Muslims and Arabs. The government was determined to fight terrorism, but discriminated innocent people. Today, Congress continues to ruin American culture by deporting immigrants. Yet researchers have shown the positive effects of immigration. Immigration is beneficial to America because immigrants provide cultural diversity, supports the economy, and eliminates uniformity that creates a dystopian society.

Howard Morton’s article discusses the problems with investigative detention and street checks. Key legal issues that are raised by Morton about the practices of street checks are that individuals do not understand that they have the right to not provide identification or answer questions. Also, that officers falsely state that individuals match the description of a suspect in a criminal investigation, they make threatening and aggressive remarks when individuals do not show identification or answer questions, and they have no authority to detain individuals to demand identification or to run it through a database without having a reasonable suspicion that they have committed a crime (Morton, 2015, p.192).

Based on J.C.Penney’s current situation, and the above issues, we recommend the following strategic models.

A few weeks earlier, John M. Case, board chairman, president, and sole owner of the

As Star River is a private company and has not issued stock, we need to make several assumptions when calculating market value of equity and price of equity. Analysis of similar companies reveals that Wintronics, Inc. and STOR-Max Corp. are the most similar firms in the market. To calculate Star River’s market value of equity I used market to book value method. I found M/B for Wintronics to be 4.4 (market price per share/book value per share) and 3.9 for STOR-Max. an average M/B ratio is 4.15, so multiplying Star River’s book value of equity of 47004 by 4.15 I found Star River’s market value of equity to be SGD195,066.6M. Average beta of these two companies is 1.615. The global equity market premium is 6%, and I use 10 year Singapore T-bond yield of 3.6% as my risk free rate.