Identification Of Communication Skills Styles And Effectiveness

policy for a nonprofit. She states that women cannot have it all due to the way the work place is

In the article “Lean In: What would you do if you weren’t afraid,” Sandberg modernizes feminism for the woman of today. Sandberg addresses many points of gender inequality that are still present in today’s society. She urges woman to not fall into passive gender roles, but rather, to be “Ambitious”. Her goal is that young women just entering the work force will not only continue, but also aim high. One point that

I think the whole book is revolved around the Acquired needs theory too. This is because this theory is the need for achievement, power, and affiliation. Many business-affiliated women strive for such qualifications. Sandberg’s book is how to achieve such goals, also how it is okay for women to be at the top of a company. As many things change in the world; the way people see women leaders have changed too. This book is about how it’s okay for women to run company’s not just households.

Following her brief career on the MSNBC, she took a step forward in her career, as she began to guest appear on the numerous TV and radio talk shows, such as “American Morning”, “Real Time With Bill Maher”, “The Michael Medved Show” and others. She slowly build her career as a controversial personality, which benefited to her popularity, but as well to her net worth, due to the increased media attention.

Also revealed is her evaluation of people and their behavior and relationships in the workplace. She evaluates how men describe their success and how their success is accepted much better then when women achieve success. This creeps into gender expectations within communication because when women speak on their success they will relate it back to others instead of taking the credit for themselves (Sandberg, 30). She admits that she has been at fault of doing this but it is something that needs to change similar to people view gender bias.

What do she stand to gain is in this quote “It’s the only way to give millions of capable women the ability to recalibrate the time that they devote to work at different stages of their lives”. The author wants to see more talented women become top corporate executives without the long hours and high quotas.

Given these points, both women agree that there is a problem with equality in our society. They understand that not as many women are being recognized and are in positions of power. However, both women do not address the same reasons why. As Sandberg puts the reason for the lack of female leadership in corporate jobs and careers is because the lack of motivation that comes from the women in the workforce. This is so from fear of risking stability of finance, work, and home-life or contentment with them all. Hooks instead believes that our society that is dominated by white supremacist capitalist patriarchy only allows for certain white privileged females such as Sandberg to rise to power, enabling her to push a faux feminism agenda that only

and I'll learn by doing it.” Society was thought as men doing everything for their family, only the wife stays home, only to take care of the kids, or a women needs a man to live their life, and depend on them. Sandberg explains that the mentality of a women needs to change from thinking the certain simple things they can achieve are impossible, the mentality of a women needs to change by attending actions where people don’t see much womans doing, Sandberg uses examples like CEO positions, like not many woman are CEO of a corporation, there isn’t much of a woman figure for them to look

The first op-ed I examined was “Sheryl Sandberg on the Myth of the Catty Women”. The main argument of the op-ed is that women support each other personally and professionally. The op-ed started off by debunking the Queen Bee Theory. The Queen Bee Theory is described as a female in charge should have a negative impact on other females trying to move up the job ladder. Contrary to belief, the queen bee theory is not common. Yes, woman can go against and support other women. Sandberg and Grant go

In 2013, Sheryl Sandberg released the best – selling novel, Lean in, that calls on professional women to “lean in” by aiming for leadership positions in their jobs and examines what factors prevent woman from doing so. Last year, her non – profit organization launched a public awareness campaign, Lean In Together, or #LeanInTogether, to partner with the NBA and WNBA. This campaign was focused on men’s roles in reaching gender equality. However, the book and campaign has faced its criticism. Reviewers have deemed the book too narrowly focused on women like Sandberg who are educated, white, and provided with opportunities out of the reach of an average female. Other critics have questioned Sandberg’s relevant guidance to the average woman, since

Feminism has been a huge part of women’s lives. People argue what is equal and what is right for the women population. In the articles “Lean In: What Would You Do If You Weren’t Afraid?” by Sheryl Sandberg and “Dig Deep: Beyond Lean In” by Bell Hooks, both authors address issues that women face such as educational opportunity, economic standings, and societal pressures, from different perspectives.

As a part of my assignment to identify the styles and different skills of communication by studying Brian Krzanich actions and behaviour. Next part is to perform a critical analysis on the identified communication styles and skills by comparing and contrasting strength, weakness of a selected person.

Sandberg’s “Lean In” vs. Hook’s “Dig Deep” are two articles that are similar, but they have differences. Sandberg’s main point is that women are over looked for executive job positions, and there is extreme sexism in play, while most job fields are ran by misogynists. She also feels as though women are looked at as second class citizens, and are only worth to either stay at home and cook and clean. She makes a great point by giving a personal example, when she stated that her grandmother had to drop out of school to take care of her family. Hook’s article is opposes Sandberg’s because Hook feel as though the main issue with female equality is racism, poverty, and cultural patriarchy are the main reasons why women are undermined,

Sandberg is trying to say that women in today’s society are not as expected to workers outside the home as they are inside the home. Sheryl Sandberg gives the illusion that the meter of a woman’s success is solely defined by her status as an employee. Another writer by the name of Bell Hooks disagrees, saying, “[Sandberg] sees women’s lack of perseverance as more the problem…” (Hook 662). Hook is trying to say there are other factors holding women back from this leadership

Sheryl Sandberg expresses her feelings very easily in the form of words while delivering any speeches or interviews. Sheryl is a good communicator who easily connects with the audience through her extraordinary interpersonal skills. While researching I have gone through her personality, socialization, education and experience. She has very effective communicating skills which includes clarity along with other vital factors like courtesy, conciseness, completeness and correctness.