Identify the Mission, Values and Key Objectives of an Organization of Your Choice and Assess the Influence of Stakeholders

All the products in the Lime Crime makeup line are cruelty free. Certainly, the New Metallic Velvetines

It is completely illogical to believe that humans will end up having the same defects because of the product as that animal did. Animals bodies and humans bodies are very different and to believe that testing these animals to see the results that it may end up causing for humans is something that makes no sense. The animal legal defense fund states, “these tests have been done already, for years—and none of these cosmetic tests are required by law”( “aldf” par.3). This demonstrates that these companies have been testing these animals for years and they have all had the same results and none of it is required. They keep on harming these animals for no reason because they have been doing it for many years and yet there has been no change to the products. Obviously animal testing needs to be stopped due to the fact that it is a useless way to test products because over 98 percent of the illness are not seen in animals, difference between animals and humans, and because these animal testings are not required by

I’ve noticed over time that products have no animal testing printed on the labels as well as many commercials that indicate they do not test their products on animals either. Researchers have started using other means to test products. Researchers are now able to grow skin cells and create a “lung-on-a-chip” along with other organs. (Erin Bilba) They are also using computer programs to determine the effects of chemicals on the human body. The goal is to cease animal testing in its entirety.

Introduction, animals that are being tested safety of their products that’s been a subject of an intense debate for over 10 years. While, a lot of people that alleged animals, the remained animals are being subjugated by the research cosmetics companies all over the country/all over the world. Even though, the scientists frequently profit from animal research, I don’t think all the suffering, the pain, and the animals dying are worth just trying find out the human benefits from the products.

When she found out that many makeup and hygiene products are tested on animals, she became incensed. She promised to herself that her products would never be tested on animals. Therefore, all of her makeup products come with a tag that specifies that they are "cruelty-free." She has found other ways to make sure her products are safe for human use and even models the products herself as an extra

Cruelty-free cosmetic brands are an advancement that will better the safety of animals and people. To exemplify, the Sydney Morning Herald states that, “It’s very difficult to work out the health hazards of synthetic hair dyes, sunscreens and preservatives using animal tests” (Page 1). Products used on animals will get different outcomes compared to humans. A product that is made for a human needs to be tested on a human to get accurate results. Testing products on an animal can have certain chemicals that humans can withstand while it can harm the animal. People do not go around using animal products on themselves because of the reactions they can get from them. Additionally, in the text, 3D-printing human skin: The end of animal testing, “bioprinted tissues could also make product testing cheaper and more accurate, cutting down the need for tests on animals” (Mendoza 1). Cosmetic lines are taking the initiative to produce products with no intentions of testing on animals. With the worry people have with side effects of products on human trials; scientists want to see where the options of technology can

Revlon and Avon then stopped animal testing. Animal testing will always be debated because cosmetic companies need to test their products before selling them to guarantee they aren't harmful. Animals are most likely their easiest resource to test because testing on humans isn't realistic and more issues would arise. These scientists are more worried about the brand rather than the animals they might be

A rabbit lives its life trapped in a laboratory. It doesn’t get fresh air and has different products tested on it every day. The product can make the rabbit go blind or cause its skin to burn, but there is nothing the rabbit can do about it. This is what happens to animals every day from cosmetic companies who test their products on animals. According to Cruelty Free Kitty (2017), over 30 cosmetic companies continue to use animal testing to improve their products. According to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (2017), “the agency has consistently advised cosmetic manufactures to employ whatever testing is appropriate and effective for substantiating the safety of their products.” This means that if the company believes animal testing is the best option for their product they are allowed to do it. Testing cosmetics on animals is cruel and inhumane, and people should avoid using products that test on animals.

This is an upsetting topic but everyone should be aware of animals being used when purchasing a product. Some products say – no animal testing involved in its development. Product testing is commonly performed on animals in order to measure the effects of the substances used in the making of cosmetics. In performing these tests, substances are placed in the eyes of conscious rabbits to assess damage to sensitive eye tissues. This is very painful for the rabbits, who often scream when the substances are applied and sometimes break their necks or backs trying to escape the restraints.

Products may claim to be "cruelty-free" or "not tested on animals,” but their claims may only refer to the finished product. Most animal testing occurs at the ingredient level which is how companies can get away with labeling their products cruelty free even if ingredients have been involved in animal testing, if the finish product is not involved in animal testing companies can manipulate the standards and falsely label the product as cruelty free. “There is currently no legal definition for cruelty free (FDA’s site). This means that some companies will say things like not tested on animals, against animal testing, never tested on animals, we don’t conduct animal testing, or cruelty free on their packaging, but they may not actually be cruelty free.” If a product with no affiliation or link to animal testing is important to you as a consumer it is vital to be familiar with the definition of cruelty free and other claims not endorsed by organizations or regulated with the help of extensive

There is many other alternatives that are unharming, humane, and also a lot cheaper. Most treatments, cosmetics, and drugs react differently on animals and humans. Plastic surgery operations always have left over skin material, so what scientists did is they have created artificial skin from the skin cells .Be aware of what products that are being tested on animals and know the cause and effects. Brands like Bath & Body Works, Urban Decay, and e.l.f do not test on animals and brands like Mary Kay, Maybelline, and AVON do test on animals. Animals are extremely important and should be treated fairly and respectfully.

According to a result of pressures from animal support groups such as PETA (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals), a number of large corporations have ceased all animals testing in recent years. These corporations include Amway, Benetton, Revlon, General Motors, and L’Oreal were recently added to the list, which used to subject animals to shocking tests. In Against Animal Testing, a booklet published by The Body Shop, a well-known cosmetics and bath company, that uses natural ingredients, like bananas, almonds, aloe Vera, chamomile, and Basil nut oil, as well as others safe for human usage is encouraged instead of testing on animals. According to PETA, all companies included on their cruelty-free list have signed PETA’s statement of

We aim to provide Australian and foreign consumers with the highest quality skincare on the market while promoting sustainable behavior and reducing our ecological footprint.

“Beauty without cruelty” is the outcry that can be heard from animal right activists around the world. The FDA does not require companies to perform tests on animals but if the cosmetic product contains chemicals that can be seen as toxins, testing becomes a necessity. There are currently thirteen safety tests that are performed on animals.

A lot of product labels are not what they seem, and the same can be said of labels that read “cruelty-free”. The term is not defined by a government agency, nor is there a particular set of standards that accompanies its usage, and as such, each company that adopts the label is free to define for themselves what “cruelty-free” signifies. It is easy to see how one can construe that these ambiguities can make these labels meaningless. Cruelty-free can pertain to both the finished product, along with any individual ingredients. Leaping Bunny and People