Ideologies And Developments Of World Wars

As liberalism ideology evolved and championed by the economic leaders, it pose a threat to the existing social settings such as the presence of the nobility, and the church. The attempt to defend existing social arrangement is what brought about conservatism. Conservatives stood against the ideas of liberals in a rational for maintaining existing traditional political structures and the centralization of power. They stood against transferring political responsibility to the common people under the disguise of equality (Shively, 2014).

People’s views on a wide range of issues are influenced or determined by the kind of foundational belief systems they hold. Therefore, the difference in the nature of opinions among individuals or groups of people alludes to the existence of distinct belief systems. In the course of history, the distinction between Liberalism and Conservatism has become more vivid particularly in the political arena where various players have expressed opposing points of view regarding the nation’s future. It is indeed undisputable that the foundational beliefs of Liberalism are diametrically opposed to those of Conservatism. This essay will give a definition of each term and describe how the two oppose each other.

Over the course of time we as people have experienced adversity and the effects that come from it. Adversity can have positive and negative impacts, many times when people struggle with adversity, it leads to chaos. We have seen this in the present, past and fiction. Adversity is shown in the present in form of a natural disaster, for example, the earthquake in Iran, adversity is seen in the past, explorers faced it, we also see adversity in the book Lord of The Flies by, William Golding. All of these examples show how adversity can have a negative impact that can turn peaceful societies into chaos.

The New Right has significantly revised the relationship between conservatism and tradition, however. The New Right attempts to fuse economic libertarianism with state and social authoritarianism. As such, it is a blend of radical, reactionary and traditional features. Its radicalism is evident in its robust efforts to dismantle or ‘roll back’ interventionist government and liberal social values. This radicalism is clearest in relation to the liberal New Right, which draws on rational theories and abstract principles, and so dismisses tradition. New Right radicalism is nevertheless reactionary in that both the liberal and conservative New Right hark back to a 19th century ‘golden age’ of supposed economic prosperity and moral fortitude. However, the conservative New Right also makes an appeal to tradition, particularly through its emphasis on so-called ‘traditional values’.

​War takes a toll on those who fight, or are affected by it, this is undeniable. Over the course of the 20th Century, within the U.S. Military and Psychiatric Community the way that this effect is identified and treated has changed many times based on the conflict and the mindset of the American public. The purpose of this report is to discuss the history of the mental effect of the trauma created by US involvement in wars within the 20th Century and the steps that were taken in those eras to predict, prepare and treat for those effects.

The book Rise of Conservatism in America, thoroughly presents important topics in modern American political history. The background the author displays helps the audience to understand each document provided. According to the text, the conservative movement expanded from economic conservatism to social conservatism. Liberal domestic programs were accepted which opened new opinions as opposed to traditional. Abortion has been one of the most controversial issues in America. The stand on abortion caused a strong political reaction bringing together a wide range of organizations during the conservative movement. Many of these organizations supported the pro-life movement and merged together to end abortion. Indeed, due to opposition to legal abortion, the conservative movement gained in popularity.

Conservatism ideas and teachings initially developed in the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries as a response against the developing pace of financial and political change which from numerous points of view that was symbolized by the French revolution (Heywood,2015). The conservative new right or neo-conservatism highlights society’s profound fragility and cautions against the spread of liberal and progressive values and the development of good and social differing qualities. Neo-conservatism regularly requires a reclamation of power and social order and a reinforcing of traditional values and national identity. Conservatism views human instinct critically in threefold. To begin with, individuals’/ human beings are constrained, dependent and security seeking creatures. Secondly, they are ethically debasing, spoiled by selfishness, greed and hunger for power. Human rationality can’t adapt to the vast complexity of the world (Heywood,2015). Conservatism view power as the premise for social attachment, contending that it gives individuals a feeling of who they are and what is anticipated from them and mirrors the progressive way of every single social organization. Conservatism values property since it gives individuals security and a measure of autonomy from government furthermore urges them to respect the law and the property of their fellow neighbours. The opposite of conservatism is democracy, and scorn for democracy is a consistent string in the history of conservative argument. Rather, conservatism has contended that society should be composed in a chain of importance of

“The world must know what happened, and never forget” (Eisenhower). This quote came from General Eisenhower in 1945, before he became president in 1953, as he visited Nazi death camps at the end of World War II. Eisenhower indicated that the horrific events that occurred throughout World War II in which military technology advanced far too rapidly for people to control should not be slipped from the memories of society, but recognized so that it can never happen again. But the majority of society did try to forget about the dreadful affairs of World War II through materialism and conservatism. These two philosophies were used to conceal the emotions brought upon society during the war in order to live unaware and ignorant, although ignorance

Conservatism is any political philosophy that favors tradition (various religions, cultural or nationally defined beliefs and customs) in the face of external forces for change, and is critical of proposals for major social change. Some Conservatives seek to preserve the status or to reform society slowly, while others seek to return to the values of an earlier time. (Philosophybasics.com, 2016)

Humanity must see the need for change in order to achieve it, and the most efficient way to precipitate change in history is war. War is the catalyst of change, war is what changes history. Change needs to been seen and needs to be acted upon with great force in order to be made. A great action and great force must occur for history to be changed, that action is

The World Wars are great examples on why this world doesn’t need conflict. These wars show how the evolution of technology can be scary and always be used for evil. Even though these wars were fought completely different they both had the same out outcome. Because war, war never

War is controversial, unfortunate, and certainly misunderstood; it is a transforming agent, a catalyst for change. Nonetheless, many people focus on war's negative consequences, while positive effects are downplayed. War is a necessary evil in the sense that it stabilizes population, encourages technological advances, and has a very high economic value. Without war, the overpopulation of the human race is inevitable. It is this reason that war is a useful tool by not only Mother Nature, but also humans themselves to institute population control.

The novel Demian written by Hermann Hesse analyzes good and evil through Emil Sinclair, a German man, reflecting back on his childhood. According to his older self, Sinclair begins his childhood in a world of pure goodness and light but as time progresses, he begins to become more exposed to the darkness the world can offer. On his journey to adulthood and self-actualization Sinclair encounters a few captivating people that help or hinder him along the way and they come to be known as his mentors. However, his most influential mentor is Demian, a boy who is only one year older than Sinclair yet is ridiculously mature, who believes that good and bad are not absolute nor is anything in the world therefore

WWI was it truly a global conflict? Yes because even if the country was not “in the war” they technically would be because the major powers would force their way through a certain country and if the allies were to here that a army there fighting against are invading a country they were to have a alliance with they would go to the country and start a war with the invading country and cause a conflict in the “Neutral” country and an all-out war would begin in the country either hurting the people of the land or damaging the country itself crippling towns and peoples business with the point it shows that everyone in the war would be affected even if they wanted nothing to do with the war with this info its should help us with our current status showing people that want to go into WWIII that if its only with two countries it’s never truly just two other country’s will end up getting involved even if they don’t want to so at all cost we should avoid any more World War in the future.

At present day, our worldwide civilization of the human race continues to surpass many achievements of other past societies. Everyday, new technological advances are being achieved and the population is growing faster than it ever previously has. We must look back at past civilizations and analyze them to understand what is in store for us in the future. In the pursuit of progress, human societies create problems they do not have the resources or political motivation to solve, for fear of short term losses in status or quality of life, which prevents further advancements and sometimes leads to collapse.1 Three factors that have enabled past civilizations to fall into progress traps and ultimately contributed to the collapse of those