preview

Igneous Petrology of Cape Granites Essay

Best Essays

Geological Setting
The Cape Granite Suite formed about 560-520 Ma during the Saldanian orogeny which occurred between 780 to 510 Ma (Harris & Vogelli, 2010; Villaros, Stevens & Buick, 2009). This orogeny formed as a result of the convergence of the Rio de la Plata and Kalahari cratons during the formation of Gondwanaland (Harris & Vogelli, 2010). The granitoids of the CGS were intruded into the three terranes of the metasedimentary and metavolcanic Malmesbury Group which are divided by distinct north-west trending shear zones (Scheepers, 2000). These terranes include the southwestern Tygerberg terrane, Swartland terrane at the centre and Boland terrane to the north east (Fig. 1) (Scheepers, 1995). The Saldania mobile belt comprises of …show more content…

Field and petrographic characteristics
The S-type granites
The S-type granitoids dominate phase 1 of the intrusion sequence of the Cape Granite Suite. They are volumetrically the most important plutons and batholiths in the Cape Granite Suite (Scheepers, 2000). They outcrop on the southwestern side of the Colenso fault as seen figure 1 (Scheepers, 1995). Harris et al. (1997) used oxygen isotope geochemistry to suggest that the S- type granites developed from an isotopically different source from the I-type granite. S-type granites were formed from a metasedimentary source and have metaluminous to moderately peraluminous compositions (Scheepers, 2000). They are subdivided into three categories namely Sa1, Sa2 and Sb granites. The Sa1 granites include batholiths like the Darling biotite granite, Darling coarse porphyritic granite, Stellenbosch coarse porphyritic granite and Langebaan granite (Scheepers, 1995). They are mostly syn-tectonic (Darling biotite granite and Stellenbosch and tend to be more deformed than the Sa2 and Sb associations (Harris et al., 1997). The Darling batholiths are generally well deformed and tend to exhibit well developed ductile and mylonite structures due to their proximity to the Colenso fault (Scheepers, 1995; Villaros, Stevens & Buick, 2009). The Sa2 granites intruded into the surrounding Sa1 granites are less abundant than the Sa1 granite (Scheepers, 1995). They include batholiths such as the Contreberg granite and

Get Access