Imaginary Belonging

A fundamental part of human existence and interaction is the notion of belonging or identifying with a group. Groups form and exist for various reasons and purposes, comprising of individuals similar or diverse in nature, that often work together toward a common goal (Stanhope & Lancaster, 2014). In 1902, the American sociologist by the name of C. H. Cooley, made distinction between primary and secondary groups. Cooley (1902) classified primary group to have intimate and comparatively permanent associations as one might find in a cohort of close friends, or a family. The groups or associations in which individuals related to each other through formal and often legalistic rules, were classified as secondary groups (Nolen, 2010).

Peaceful protesting is one of the biggest positives that come from police brutality, and there are not many positives at all. Even though many feel this is not helpful it gives officers less of a reason to disturb your constitutional right. It is hard to practice this form of protesting with so much anger built up inside of you. If you simply look back into history during the times of MLK, Ghandi, and Nelson Mandela you see the success in peaceful protesting. They made a monumental dent in history. They fought against such things as Police brutality and mistreatment of their

Taking a look at history, there are many events that have been recorded that involve some type of protest. It usually seems that those who exercise their right to peacefully protest have had a greater impact than those who protest in violent and uncivil manner. Protests that evolve into riots and ensue police brutality have no positive impact on society, rather they cause damage and a strong controversy between people and society and the government. For example: the riot that exploded in ferguson Missouri when Michael Brown was shot. The only thing that resulted from a protest such as that

Peacefully violating the law isn't being a bad person only if we have respect towards what we are doing and in return we get ours. When we have what goes around comes around we came to halt that nothing comes out of being completely justified using our fist. Thats when we use words to heal the wound and change something we think is not moral. To approve a law peacefully by resisting is to protest with a group that belongs together that knows who the person or audience they are aiming for. But this is an impact that depends on the situation protesters are in. If they peacefully resist the laws, then of course it will positively influenced the free society of this era because everyday there is always something new to

Resistance to laws positively impact a free society. The ability to resist and protest is a freedom in itself, and gives the government feedback from the American citizens. Without peaceful resistance, our government would not know what to change and people would get progressively more mad every day.

This is another reason why peacefully resisting the law is a positive thing to a free society because it gives an example on how to lead properly and gain enough respect to be heard. In more recent times, there has been another civil rights movement in the American Society. What the people are angry about now is the police brutality towards minority groups across the nation. The "Black Lives Matter" movement was sparked at people began using their voices, but in the wrong way. The American flag is being burned, National Anthem disrespected, and innocent police officers killed. This is also getting widely televised, but not for the same reasons the peaceful protests were in the 1960s. Back then, protesters were not doing any harm to show exactly how they were being treated, which eventually did not continue because no one felt threatened or the need to fight back. Now protesters are doing a great amount of harm and all it is doing is worsening the sole issue instead of making it better. Today's protesters are being hypocritical and therefore it makes people not want to support them or even listen. If they want peace, then they need to provide

The authors explore the "Belonging Hypothesis" as proposed by Baumeister and Leary (2009) who based it on the idea that humans were made with "the need to belong" after their extensive review. The authors split the hypothesis into 3 parts as follows -- 1. The larger a person's "need to belong" is, t he larger the effect of homesickness. ; 2. By the substitution hypothesis, the more close friendships made in a new place, the smaller the effect of homesickness. ; 3. Feeling more adapted to a new location will decrease the effects of homesickness and the need to sustain existing relationships. The authors carry out 2 studies to help support the "Belonging Hypothesis", one correlation based and the other experimental based. The correlational

Just like Rosa Parks who refused to give up her seat, peaceful resistance may be taking small steps, but it all leads to the greater good. Back during times of slavery, slaves would show resistance, not through fighting or rebelling against their masters, but slowing down the time they were working by breaking tools and running to the northern states. All these things plus the terrible things the owners of the slaves did to them piles up and spread across the north, eventually leading to the north wanting to free slaves and ending slavery which caused the civil war period. All these non violent things the slaves did was worth doing, if they had used violence, I don't think the north would have had as much sympathy and compassion for them to help ensure their

Peaceful resistance to laws impacts a free society in a positive way. If people were to resist laws in a destructive manner it would cause a great outburst of violence not solving the problem at hand. I believe that when people resist laws in a peaceful manner they get respected and followed by almost everyone, like the protest led by Mohandas Gandhi. Gandhi protested for India’s freedom from the British rule which began on March in 1930, he had a history of fighting for Indians’ rights, this was just one of his many battles that he won.

My interest in this topic dates back in high school when I realized how much effect sense of belonging had on my education. During elementary school, things used to happen just like I wanted. Teachers, other pupils were quite friendly. In fact, school was the most exciting place I always wanted to be. I was always the best performing pupil in continuous assessment test and end of year’s exams. Things changed when I went to high school. Everyone was very busy with their work. Teachers and fellow were quite serious. I found that my grades were not as excellent as in elementary school. Nothing motivated me. My behavior worsened and at some point, I even wanted to drop out of school as I felt that I was completely out of place. I believe that

In this day and age, change is vital. In order to see change, we must stand up for what we believe in. By speaking out against laws we believe to be unjust, we can make a difference. As long as we act with peace and respect, it is possible to change the law if your reasoning is sensible. Due to this, I wholeheartedly believe that peaceful resistance to laws has an overall positive impact on a free society. I came to this realization during my attendance at a local “Speak Up, Speak Out” rally in which our main goal was to protest against racism, police brutality, and to essentially speak up for those being oppressed by our society. Due to the resurgence of racial inequalities in America, police brutality has been a major issue this year in politics.

First, this peaceful resistance is healthy for our communities because it allows for altering unjust laws. Many issues that require nonviolent protests are forgotten or ignored matters. According to Martin Luther King Jr., the government’s indifference towards those problems forces people to “dramatize the issue that it can no longer be ignored” (Luther). Thus, peaceful protesters mean to create tension in the community that propels others into listening to their message. This attention for to the given matter, if strong enough, ultimately leads to an amendment in the constitution. Altogether, civil disobedience is appropriate because it purges our government of unconstitutional

Peaceful resistance to laws negatively impacts a free society, because it sets forth restrictions on that society; while at the same time it positively impacts society by keeping the violence out of their protesting. Peaceful residence to laws began before the birth and crucifixion of Jesus Christ, and continues today with Trumps immigration policies.

The idea that peaceful resistance can positively or negatively impact a free society is a topic that requires much thought. Our basic freedoms in this country allow us the right to peacefully protest an injustice that has been done and permitted. One can stage arguments that favor both points of view. The difficulty comes in questioning which laws are debatable and which are not. Do we peacefully resist to laws that protect life or do we resist to laws that seem unpalatable to us personally? I believe we, as Americans, need to be very clear on where to draw the lines. The laws that our nation has adopted are extremely important to the functioning and growth of a proper and stable society.

In history and in many current events we see many people who have peacefully resisted the law. When someone goes against the laws they are doing so because they feel the specific law is not right. They are trying to show the law-makers that the law is not right. Before someone has decided to resist against the law they have tried other methods before. We can look at Rosa Parks.