Imc Campaign Honesty

Televisions do an excellent job at broadcasting an entire election to the public. They keep

For several decades, the American people have been skeptical if their votes count due to the uncertainty of various voting methods. The election process is marred with dissatisfaction and inaccuracy in governmental elections. Voting means a lot to citizens because it is what gets the people’s voices heard. There are voters that are uncertain of trusting the candidates that will make their laws and regulations, however, they still have the power to vote them out from office. But when different types of voting equipment have problems those issues affect all voters. There are ways of voting that can sometimes fail, and the discovery of fraud in the voting process can make people question the election results. The right to vote is what many Americans believe is the most essential part of being an American in a democratic nation. To keep the American citizens’, trust the voting operation system must work properly and establish that the people’s votes are counted. The American election administration is facing the new generation of technology that is designed for voting. The management of hardware and software can be a great challenge for many upcoming elections throughout the years ahead. Today, there are several methods of counting votes with equipment that are used for the election system. The voting methods are Direct-Recording Electronic (DRE), Optical Scan Paper

The federal government occasionally passes legislation intended to regulate the amount of corruption that occurs during election season. However, the effects of these regulations have not at all been collectively positive. These regulations have unfortunately encouraged the increase in campaign contributions and spending by various nefarious influences.

candidates buy the election. At first glance, this may not appear to be all too much of a problem.

There are many qualities a presidential candidate should endure, however, as a high school student I believe that if someone wants to rule our country, they should strongly be able to have the ability to create trust, temperament, and persuasiveness. These qualities will powerfully help the presidential candidate to have leadership competence, communication and negotiation skills, hospitality, and take better decisions. A presidential candidate may have a great campaign that will let the citizens have an idea of their priorities, however, they don’t have a political perspective of the difficulties of running our nation. Honesty is a huge conflict between the candidates, because they need to be trusted by the American people; they should have

With the current presidential elections approaching soon, there is plenty of political activity going on in our communities. Many people follow the presidential elections and listen to what these candidates have to say, however, there are other elections going on in our own communities that also have a big impact on us. We sometimes tend to forget about our local candidates and at times ignore what they have to offer for us. I, myself, am able to relate to this. I decided to take action and go out to a local community to do voter registration with the hope that people would not only register, but also go out on November 8 and vote.

America’s history was full of greed, it is not a surprise that we are still struggling with it today. In the YouTube video ”Rory Stewart: Why Democracy Matters”, Rory gives great examples of morality and how democracy should be built with trust. I agree with Roys vision, we should be governed on the basis of honesty. America has elections, but people are easily persuaded with charm and a great smile. How could people really know a candidate’s true intent, the answer is they can not until it is too late.

Our elections are now considered a corrupt and torn apart system and “if our elections get appreciably more corrupt, extending the trajectory they were already on in 2012, the use of the term ‘democracy’ to describe the United States will be inaccurate in even the weakest sense of the term” (Nichols and McChesney). Just in the 2016 election campaigns alone, in between six and seven billion dollars were spent. All of this money was spent to win as many voters as possible to win the election. Some large businesses and other parties donate large amounts of money to the campaign that will benefit their business or values. The winner of the election then may pass policies to benefit their largest donors. It is not fair to the citizens who don't have the money to benefit themselves with policies. Every voter should have the same amount of say in each election, no matter how much money they have to give.

First, you should find out if the candidates are telling the truth. Most if not all of previous and current presidential candidates have lied during their campaign. Goerge Bush Jr. did not tell the truth in his campaign for

Many of today’s politicians dance around their pasts and who they are as a person, this leads to the risk of the people being fooled and voting for an incapable candidate, which could wreak havoc on the government and the country.. It has become an anomaly

This would exacerbate any potential doubts on the electorate’s mind about illegal collusion between candidates and large financial supporters.

complain since they could have tried to stop this person from coming into the office. Therefore, voters

Besides that, there were complaints about the use of indelible ink in the 13th general Election. Oppositions and clean-polls activists reported that the ink could be easily washed off (Election ink under scrutiny in Malaysia, 2013). To avoid the issue of phantom voters and to reduce human error when checking the voter’s information during the election a new modern polling

Some voters cast their ballots based on the emotions such as trust rather than on the candidate's experience or policy. These voters lean toward those candidates who appear to share the voter's concerns on the political issues at the time. They vote for a candidate that appears to be honest and have integrity (Schmidt, Shelley, Bardes, 2011, p.196)

Political corruption is parasitic; it finds a host, and can almost always find a way to survive. Eventually, people grow dependent on this corruption as a means for income, thus forming a symbiosis between the people who benefit from it, and the elites that regulate it. People sometimes ignore the corruption surrounding them, feeling that as long as the politicians do their jobs well, their ‘extra salary’ can’t hurt (BNS).