Impact Of Civil Disobedience On Society

The  Civil Rights Movement is a substantial example of civil disobedience for the reason that  they were peacefully protesting while accepting their consequences.  On the other hand, people today believe that they're protesting peacefully however, peace can lead to violence and take away the credibility of their cause. Causing destruction in their community, where civil disobedience impacts society negatively because the situations get out of hand that cause chaotic cases which involves brutality.

Though, I feel strongly that no law should be broken, I do see purpose in the peaceful disobedience provided you are willing to suffer the consequences. Therefore I would have to agree that it positively impacts a free society. We are all under strict laws and it is our freedom to either obey or not, with the latter resulting in consequence. Take for instance, the protest against injustice, the harmless act that took place in the Negro movement with Martin L. King. Not to mention the fact pointed out in Arguments against Civil Disobedience, sums up the fact that if we do not argue a point, another point would never be made. Not all situations are to be defended but some should. It is like a growth among us, which completely leads me to disagree with (as mentioned in the attacks), self-law making. There must be a form of discussion taking place (within certain levels of citizens) in order to advance in changes to laws as they were originally written. That is what makes us a free society.

Peaceful resistance to laws has a positive impact on society. Because it's not harming anybody and they're standing up for what they believe in and they have equal rights to every one else. One example was Rosa Parks. At the time, blacks had to go to the back of the bus and one day she decided she was going to stay in the front of the bus because she was tired. She was also making a statement that people should be able to sit wherever they choose to.

Peaceful resistance to laws positively impacts our free society. It allows us to make our voices heard and spread a message if there is a law that we find is either unfair or goes against our protected freedoms. Peaceful resistance has helped our country grow on multiple occasions. It has always been a part of our countries history and is well protected by our First Amendment rights. Due to this, There is little to know doubt that peaceful resistance has positively effected the lives of many Americans.

Does peaceful resistance to laws positively or negatively impact a free society? In your answer, incorporate the principles and specific examples (including current events) that support your conclusion.

I believe that peaceful resistance positively impacts a free society. Peaceful resistance has been used by activists for hundreds of years, examples being Mahatma Gandhi and even the founders of the United States. Peaceful resistance has consistently been used as a way for people to convey to their government their views and their feelings in a nonviolent and amicable way. It has been used as a tool for people such as the women of the Suffragette Movement, the people of the Civil Rights Movement, and even for people today to stand up for what they believe in and to make their voices heard.

Peaceful resistance to laws positively impacts a free society because it arouses concern and opens the eyes of law makers and others who are obliged to follow them.

Peaceful resistance to laws positively impact a free society because it allows people to protest laws they find unjust without harming anyone in the process. Sometimes we have disagreements with our government and that doesn’t mean that we should start a revolution and over throw the government. With peaceful resistance to the law, there is more freedom and rights given to people.

Peaceful resistance to laws positively impact a free society, because all committed acts of civil disobedience, all but in very different cases. Have shown a positive impact amongst the people by proving to everyone and the government that every U.S citizen has the freedom to fight for their rights and freedom and not let anyone disrespect their human morals.

Peaceful resistents to laws either positively or negatively impacts a free society. I believe that peaceful resistant to laws does positively impact a free society just look at Rosa Parks, Thomas Jefferson and also Daniel Ellsberg they all helped in some type of way by using peaceful resistance to the laws. In some ways civil disobedience does help the government get better and also some says that it destroys the civil society. From the article ,"Is it right to break the law" by Charles Frankel it discuss is it ever right to break the law and in some situations it is but it also depends on how you handle the situation and what your motives are. It depends on if you are harmimg someone and if your taking a stand and wanting to change something for the better. I do not believe that is showing negatively on society

Peaceful resistance to laws positively impacts a free society as long as the person is willing to take on the punishment. If you are resisting an unjust law, then in order for it to be effective no one must be harmed and the resistance must be organized and controlled. Peaceful resistance to laws has been more efficient in general in the history of the United States. If you look at the examples of Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X when they were struggling for equal rights, Dr. King was much more successful in his movement because his movement was peaceful while Malcom X’s movement was violent. The United States government tends to make change a little easier when dealt with in a more peaceful and diplomatic matter.

In my opinion, peaceful resistance to laws positively impacts a free society. The whole point of a "free society" is where the people have a say and are able to stand up for what they believe in. If a law seems unjust to them, they should have the right to protest it or disobey it, as long as it is done peacefully. Martin Luther King is one of the most influential leaders in history. Without his non-violent protests and civil disobedience, the unjust laws of segregation might still be in place. One of my favorite quotes from MLK's "Letter From Birmingham Jail" is when

Does peaceful resistance to laws positively or negatively impact a free society? I think that peaceful resistance positively impacts a free society. Many people used civil disobedience to prove a point in a situation that they believe needs to be changed. There are people such as Henry Throeau, Gandhi, Martin Luther King and Rosa Parks. Many people say that Henry Thoreau is the backbone to civil disobedience. Thoreau was arrested in 1846 for refusing to pay six years of poll taxes in protest of slavery and the Mexican American War. Thoreau believed that individuals could be free only if their actions were true to their own beliefs, with or without the support or approval of the community. Thoreau inspired Gandhi first and then MLK to follow, but these two leaders are responding to more pressing circumstances and responding as members of subjugated classes of people sharply defined by the social markers of race and ethnicity. Another important person who used civil disobedience is the same person who said "You must be the change you wish to see in this world" -Mahatma Gandhi. Gandhi used nonviolent civil disobedience to protest racial pass laws in South Africa and in India's Independence struggle, including the famous Salt

Civil disobedience positively impacts society. I suppose that depends on what you feel is unfair. For instance my mom has given me the freedom to make judgment calls on my own at the age of 16 whereas my brother who often didn't make the best choices wasn't granted this freedom until he was 18 I being 16 had bought myself a car kept a job and passing grades balancing all this i still managed to make time for my family and a girlfriend. To my brother this freedom i have earned was unfair after all, he was older why did his younger brother get more privileges than him? To him it was that our mom just liked me more and to protest he continued to do what he wanted behind or mom's back. This path of irresponsibility on his part put more pressure

Peaceful resistance to laws positively impacts a free society. Rather than having violent movements and harming citizens, it is better to peacefully resist. Once a violence is used, the resistance to the law becomes nulled. People tend to not follow a violence protester. Once a violent riot starts, chaos is everywhere. People forget what they are truly fighting for. They unconsciously run away with the fear of getting harmed and dare not to go back. A peaceful resistance on the other hand leads citizens to join and support. People are able to see what they are fighting for and their real intentions. They are able to stand and cause no problem to people passing by as they are showing their support through silent voices. Many famous activists and leaders are for nonviolence. Mahatma Gandhi, a primary leader of India’s independence