Impact Of The Missouri Compromise Of 1820

The Missouri Compromise was created by Henry Clay and it was passed in 1820.The Missouri compromise was made between Northern anti-slavery states and Southern pro-slavery states, because they wanted both states to be equal. During the Compromise, the north and south arugued with each other whether the new states should be slave state or free state. There were many effects that caused by the Missouri Compromise. For example, Maine entered the United Staes as a free state and Missouri entered the United Sates as a slave state. But the south lost the chance to admit more slave holding states besides what they owned in the small territory, and in the north Maine was separated from Massachusetts. During that age, slavery was banned in parts of the

The 1820 Missouri Compromise played a large role in the campaign against slavery. In 1819 Missouri became a statehood and congress considered framing a state constitution, with this a representative attempted to add a anti-slavery legislation with it. This is what started the process of the campaign against slavery. Henry Clay made a large contribution toward this compromise in 1820, with his new ideas on how to settle the conflict between the North and the South, which lasted until 1954.All the compromise’s made from 1820's to the Kansas Nebraska compromise

At the time, the land was being put to good use however people quickly began to bring the issue of slavery up in terms of geography. In 1820, the Missouri Compromise was passed to try and keep peace between slaveholders and non-slave holders. The

In 1820 Missouri wanted to join the Union as a slave state. Since it would ruin the balance between Slave states and Free states in the Senate, Henry Clay came up with the Missouri compromise. What it did was make Missouri a Slave state and Maine a free state. “This law prohibited slavery in the Louisiana Territory north of the 36° 30´ latitude line.”(Bibliography source #2) It also allowed the owners to recapture runaway slaves that fled to the North, like wanted posters describing them and how much for the reward. “Runaway from the subscriber, on the night of Thursday, the 30th of September” (Bibliography#3) They limited themselves by only applying the Compromise to the states gained in the Louisiana Purchase, this than led to the fighting after the Mexican war when America gained new territories in the West. This ruined the Missouri Compromise. Historians believe that if the Compromise had been applied to all

The Missouri Compromise was only important for preserving the Union for that small period of time. This is evident through the fact that the Compromise of 1850, Fugitive Slave Law, and other debates occurred even after the Missouri Compromise. Many Americans agreed that slavery would be the issue that led the United States to a civil war and the Missouri Compromise was one of many events that delayed the war.

The Missouri Compromise was an effort by Congress to keep the delicate balance between the slave and free states that would have been upset by the addition of Missouri as a slave state. After a tedious back and forth between the free and slave states, Henry Clay, speaker of the house at the time, orchestrated the missouri compromise in March 1820. The compromise stated that congress would not restrict the admission of Missouri as a slave state but as a result Maine would be added as a free state. Northerners also wanted a prohibition of slavery in the remaining territory of the louisiana purchase north of 36° 30´ latitude line. The compromise was important because it put off the dreaded debate of slavery, albeit not for long. The compromise

The Missouri compromise was a very important event that marked the beginning of the long battle against slavery. In the years leading up to the Missouri compromise tensions were rising between the North and the South. The states were all being divided into slave states and free states. Free states were states that were anti-slavery and were made up of mainly Northern states while slave states were states that supported slavery and were all mostly Southern states. Before the Missouri compromise the amounts of slave and free states were kept balanced. When Missouri met all the requirements to become a state and wanted to be admitted as a slave state, it threatened to tip the balance. The Missouri compromise allowed the admission of Missouri as a slave state while at the same time allowing Maine to be admitted as a free state, maintaining the balance. It also prohibited slavery in the states North of the southern boundary of Missouri. This conflict inspired other people and was the first major battle against slavery. It also kept the number of free and slave states even preventing the balance from being tipped in favor of slavery. One of the arguments that I intend to make to prove that the Missouri compromise was the beginning of this battle is that the Missouri Compromise prevented pro slavery states from gaining majority in the senate. A second point that I will make is that the Missouri compromise opened up serious debates and conversations that otherwise may not have

The Missouri Compromise of 1820: The Missouri Compromise of 1820 was created by Henry Clay. This compromise would benefit both the Northern states and the Southern states. This compromise had occurred when the territory of Missouri wanted to become an official state. The only problem with this was that Missouri wanted to be a slave state.

In 1819 the union was trying to find a balance of power between free and slave states, as tensions rose, people were wanting war but the missouri compromise is the sole reason why the civil war was delayed for over twenty years. The slave states were outraged when the union decided that Missouri would be a free slave state instead of a slave state. This would upset the balance of power between slave and non slave states. As the slave states inched towards a war with the union, the Missouri compromise delayed this act. The Missouri compromise is the sole reason why the civil war was delayed, with congress arguing over the admission of Missouri, the boundary the compromise set up and it helped reduce the tensions between the north and the south.

The Missouri Compromise of 1820, was a new effort by the U.S. Senate, and House of Representatives to maintain power between the slaveholding states and states that were free. The slave holding states feared that they would become outnumbered in Congressional representation, that they would lack the power to protect their interests in power and trade.

The Missouri Compromise of 1820 was made for compromise and it created a geographical line that divided slave states from non-slaveholding states. The Missouri Compromise prohibited slavery in all remaining territories above the 36’30’ parallel and allowed slavery below the line. (Pg. 16). This division of the states still brought disruption between the Union and the Confederacy and by allowing this “compromise” not only brought the states farther apart but the birth of the Abolition Movement and concerns from both sides became public. “Southern complaints struck a sympathetic chord with conservative northerners,” May adds, “who worried abolitionist provocations would estrange slaveholders from the Union, causing its dissolution.”

The Missouri Compromise was passed in 1820. This compromise essentially settled on whether or not Missouri was considered a slave state or a free state. It was to settle the furious debates in Congress on the issue of slavery. This was mainly because the slave states wanted to ensure their power in the Congress. They know that if there isn’t a balance of slave and free states, the free states would have more power in the government. This was also to ensure that the Senate would have a North or South majority to pass laws regarding slavery. This Compromise ended up with Missouri admitted as a slave state, but also made Maine a free state. Although this was controversial, it kept the nation together until the Kansas-Nebraska Act.

The Missouri Compromise, enacted in 1820, forced American politicians to attempt to find a solution to the issue of slavery and its expansion into the territories gained by the Louisiana Purchase. With the addition of new territories being gained by the United States the issue of whether the new states would be slave states or free states arose. Prior to the Louisiana Purchase the states maintained a frail balance of both free and slave states. The North and the South, both wished to keep an equal number of representatives within the senate, and the new territories to the west threatened to undo this balance. When Missouri announced that they wished to join the Union as a slave state, the issue immediately became controversial. The Northern

The Missouri Compromise, from the beginning, was a terrible idea. The Missouri Compromise was made to solve short term problems, so it would eventually have to be demolished. This compromise had to end because there would always be conflict between the number of free and slave states, which would cause imbalance within the government, meaning they had to resolve this problem once again. Not only did the Missouri Compromise increase the conflict between free and slave states, but it added on to the sectionalism in America.

This would authorize the people of the territory to form a constitution and a state government and this was the goal they hoped to achieve. They also set out for the admission of the territory to be in the Union and on equal footing with the original states. By 1819, Congress was considering allowing legislation. This would authorize Missouri to frame a constitution for the state. Missouri wanted admission from the Union and the Northern states opposed it. They felt as if the Southern states that were slaveholding had too much power already. Also, the Constitution allowed states to count each slave as three-fifths of a person. They determined population with these numbers which raised the amount of Congressional representatives the state could have. Thus, the South had an advantage in Congress. After the first petition was applied, a debate occurred over the government’s right to restrict slavery. Since popular support in northern states for the restriction of slavery remained high, northern politicians had strong incentives to oppose the admission of any new states with slavery (Forbes, 2007). The Missouri Compromise came about in 1820. It was an effort for the Senate and House of Representatives to seek a balance of power between the slave states and the Free states. After a debate, the Missouri Compromise was passed in February of 1821. This served notice to the North that Southerners did not want slavery to end and they wanted to expand it. Because of the