Impact of Us Aid on Pakistan Economy

Should the United States increase foreign aid? This is a topic that has come up many

Pakistan gained its independence in 1947, and was mostly under martial law until 1984, four years before the IMF started granting loans to Pakistan that would never be repaid. Despite having a historic culture and ample natural resources, Pakistan as a country cannot seem to keep it’s head above water financially. Doctor Ehtisham Ahmad of the London School of Economics says,“11 out of 12 IMF programs since 1988

Many skeptics challenge the reasoning for investing so much money into helping so many other countries when that money could instead help us improve internal affairs. After all, foreign aid spending has increased to $50 billion a year today, which could be put towards funding education to ensure that more kids go to college and possibly affecting the innovation of the future(Morris). Giving more than you receive is nice, but when it involves a country 's financial crisis, maybe it 's best if Santa cuts back some of this year 's presents. And although the argument may be valid, lending out a helping hand can create more allies than enemies to help us in return when we need it. In fact, foreign aid only accounts for 0.5 percent of the federal budget (Stearn). Compared to all the other matters at hand that the government is worrying about, the amount of spending put into aiding poorer countries is positive in both a moral aspect and a political aspect.

Ever had that one friend? The one who tries to help, but no matter how hard he tries, he just aggravates the situation. This friend, Steve, insists he is helping, and those around, too, would support that he is indeed helping. But Steve is actually worsening the circumstances. He is like countries who provide foreign aid to less developed countries. Foreign aid, defined as “the international transfer of capital, goods, or services from a country or international organization for the benefit of the recipient country or its population,” can be military, economic, or humanitarian (“Foreign”). It is often granted to less developed countries in order to evoke government reforms or to stimulate economic growth. However, foreign aid neither elicits government reform, nor does it consistently and reliably stimulate economic growth; therefore, the United States should discontinue providing foreign economic aid.

Throughout history and present day times, many countries such as Germany, France, and Canada have provided assistance and aid to underdeveloped countries to help alleviate poverty. The United States itself issues aid to developing countries which include Israel, Afghanistan, Nigeria, and Ethiopia; this has been an American practice since 1947 after World War II. During the time period from 1947 to 1949 the United States, under the Marshall Plan, provided both financial and technical assistance to Europe and Asia after the war. As a result, Europe was rebuilt both politically and economically. Today the United States continues to provide aid to underdeveloped countries, helping them evolve and strengthen their economy. Many Americans believe that America is doing the right thing in issuing aid, while others hold the opinion that the United States should not issue aid, and that the issue of money to developing countries needs to stop.

The foreign country receiving aid needs to receive the correct type of help for them to get out of poverty. If they received affordable education and studies, they will be able to obtain skills needed to improve and stabilize their country. When they receive certain skills, they will be more prominent to get jobs to help provide for them. With better education, they will be able to form a strong country and become wealthy. The United States has many resources already, so much that the government pays farmers not to grow crops.

The United States of America gives billions of dollars in financial aid each year to help support a myriad of different countries to include Afghanistan, Pakistan, India, and multiple African nations. It is morally and ethically correct to help countries in times of true emergency, but how much help is considered too much? Are we as a nation hindering our own growth and future preservation by contributing to this worldwide aid? The answer is very clear when put into perspective.

In an article title Military Aid Should Do No Harm by William D. Hartung, the author is

The CIA has played a prominent role combating radical Islamic groups in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and the Middle East since 1979. After the soviet invasion of Afghanistan in 1979, the CIA even funded some of these groups in order to embarrass their main enemy at the time, the Soviet Union. They did not, however, account for the fallout that would occur after the Soviets left. To a certain extent, the terrorist attacks on 9/11 were a blowback from CIA policies in that region, and the attacks, arguably, could have been prevented.

I think it would depend upon the situation and who it affects. If it affect the United States allies then they should intervene. But if it is something that another country can figure out and doesn’t affect US, then there should be no intervention. It should more than likely be in the best interest for the US. In many cases in which the US interfered with foreign affair often lead to Wars. By making a deal with Spain, they took Philippine’s and interfered with their national affairs which lead to the American-Filipino war. Another example would be the intervention with Cuban affairs. This country wanted to create an independent constitution and the Platt Amendment was created and allowed the US to take over naval bases for their benefit and

The arguments on aid have been seen largely from two perspectives: idealistic and realistic points of view. The idealist arguments are normative, with no real possibilities of assessing their validity. In contrast, evidence can be gathered to test the economic consequences of aid although different interpretations of the evidence are always possible and disagreements over the conclusiveness of the test are

In 1954, United States of America started to help developing countries by operating the new assistant program. America gave farm surpluses to developing countries and succeeded to stabilize farm prices. Later on, United States of America provided the biggest monetary help to developing nations. Especially in 2004, America accounted 54% of the world’s foreign aid. Also, since 2002, America is supporting more than 65 countries with more than two billion dollars in average. However, some people are criticizing about the American way of supporting developing nations. Since America gives developing nations money and food supplies, this can undermine developing nations’ self-reliance and make them wait for other nations to help them. Thus, America is finding ways to help developing nations to become independent economically. Some American organizations are even teaching them proper ways to farm and grow crops to help them become gradually

American foreign aid, when utilized appropriately and with a clear organization and planning, ultimately does help U.S. national interests. However, when the United States doles out foreign aid carelessly and with little prior planning and foresight of possible negative consequences, American foreign aid can also hinder U.S. national interests. Such an example of inadequate planning can be seen in the humanitarian relief given to Haiti, where much of the aid was utilized inefficiently and mostly spent on relieving Haiti’s debts and just barely keeping people alive. The United States’s mistake in this regard was that it had only planned for a short term humanitarian aid package to Haiti, while not considering how to map out a developmental aid

"To what extent did events and policies during the Cold War involving India and Pakistan determine their growth till 1991?"

This piece of writing will provide evidences and determine whether trade is the key to economic growth in developing countries but not aid. While trade is the key to economic growth in developing countries, good governance also plays a vital role in economic development. Nevertheless, aid and trade are aimed at different goals. This assignment starts with investigating the connection between aid and development with providing an evidence of its negative impact. It also compares the effect of trade and aid. Secondly, it