Implementing The Plan And New Change

Daft explains Organization Development as a three-step process that involves unfreezing, changing and refreezing (Daft, 2014). Overcoming resistance to change occurs during the unfreezing stage where “people throughout the organization [are made] aware of problems and the need for change. This stage creates the motivation for people to change their attitudes and behaviors” (Daft, 2014). Participation of those directly affected by the change has been shown to be the most effective technique in reducing resistance to change and minimizing the disruptive period of organization readjustment that naturally follows any change in the workplace.

In the era of Globalization, where organizations are struggling to get competitive advantage, a good leader and his leadership style might be identified as the key factors that drive the company to its success. Even though the concept of leadership has changed throughout the years and it is still evolving, it can be defined as “ a process of social influence, which maximizes the efforts of others, towards the achievement of a goal” (Kruse, 2013). However, how can a good leader be recognized? Which is the most successful leadership style? Are leaders “born” or “made”? According to one of the greatest business leaders of the contemporary age, Jack Welch, “Before you are a leader, success is all about growing yourself. When you become a leader, success is all about growing others.” The aim of this essay is to critically analyse the above quote and to examine Jack Welch’s leadership style in comparison with the most relevant leadership theories, which have been developed over the years.

In order to successfully and effectively implement change all of the employees should have a good understanding of how the changes will benefit the organization, their positions, and how it might impact their routines. To many employees the implementation of change is not always properly communicated, and the process of change on paper as it is being implemented can be threatening as well as confusing. Also, the people behind the scenes making the changes may not have taken specific details into consideration regarding effective changes that perhaps the employees

Implementing change in an organization is complicated. It is important that a manager understands their role and responsibilities for which could very well be the success or failure of an organization. A manager should know how to handle staff resistance, and the areas that require change. There are processes that help management with assisting their staff members with adjusting to change and concentrate on the areas of importance. This process includes planning, assessment, implementation, and evaluation. The difference between a failed organization and a successful manager is when the manager has the ability to implement change with little disruption to

Some many organizational change efforts fail to reach their intention, but the high-ranking sponsors often blame the disappointment on the employees and manager struggle to change at times. They really don’t know how difficult it is to lead and implement change effectively (Robbins, 2011). A good change does require good people skills. Employees resist change because employees can be very unsure about the loss of status or job security within the organization. This would mean the employees and there manager as well as their peers will resist technological changes. The employees will also endure fear of failure that could cause employees to doubt their ability to do the job/ or their duty. Those type of change employees are resisting because the employees are too worried about learning the new requirements. Peer pressure can be endured as well for employees when the employees start to resist change to protect their co-worker, and so will the manager to protect their work group. The human resources roles are planning and implementation, planning would be evaluation of

The first step in driving the necessary change within the organization is to secure an outside consultant to serve as a change agent. The change agent will facilitate and guide the organizational development (OD) through process consultation intervention. In this process, it will be necessary to identify sources of resistance through Force field analysis. Once the sources are identified, one-on-one meetings and group meetings will be conducted to educate the employees on the changes and the reasons why change is necessary. This step will find the management team working to re-define the vision of the organization. As part of motivating the

Not only were the leaders impressed by the employees insights, they took action to address all of the problems. As a result, participation increased, communication improved, relationship between employees and management improved, and access to training and development opportunities were wide-spread. But most importantly, once the original change initiatives were introduced, employees embraced the initiatives, offered insights on how to improve their outcomes, and ensured their success.

Large scale change is not a simple matter, the complexity and many moving parts can be distilled down into a couple models, however pulling off a successful transformation is extremely challenging. Unfortunately, the odds are not good for change. Research by John Kotter revealed that only thirty percent of change programs succeed. The main reasons for the failures are not related to resources or budgets, but behavior and more specifically, employee resistance and management behaviors that do not support the intended changes. These are the two leading causes that result in seventy percent of failures. Kotter first reported on this dismal success rate back in 1995, and quite honestly, there has been little progress at advancing the success of

Achieving organizational change that produces results is not just a managerial challenge; it is a cognitive challenge, too. Managers, like people generally, find it difficult to think about dynamic events like feedback loops and time delays. It is easier to pay attention to immediate effects and visible changes. The outcome is a focus on the short-term and local not the longer-term and global results from change, a problem that organizational incentives amplify. Thus, local improvements in cost reduction or efficiency are assumed to benefit the firm as whole, while little attention is given to actually ensuring results for the firm.

Managers have to bring changes into a company because some of the old ways of doing order or working with employees need to change. The manager responsibility is to make sure the changes which the company is implementing are done at a right pace and all the employees know the reason for the change. Some people at an organization are use to one way and not want to settle for anything they are not use to. It is up to the manager to change the minds of the individuals who do not want to make the change. The manager has to show the older way of the company is in need of change and if they do not change, it

It is here where the staff is encouraged to participate in the change process. In order to do this effectively groups of employees that were found to have similar strengths will be assigned to projects that match their attributes. It is also important to have a feedback program in which the staff members can easily communicate their concerns, ideas or problems with the managers. The manager will know how to create these teams and programs through the data collected during the assessment stage (Sullivan, 2009).

Week 3, the lecture on Managing Change describes organizational changes that occur when a company makes a shift from its current state to some preferred future state. Managing organizational change is the process of planning and implementing change in organizations in such a way as to decrease employee resistance and cost to the organization while concurrently expanding the effectiveness of the change effort. Today's business environment requires companies to undergo changes almost constantly if they are to remain competitive. Students of organizational change identify areas of change in order to analyze them. A manager trying to implement a change, no matter how small, should expect to encounter some resistance from within the organization.

Defining and organizing change is not an easy feat. Many things need to be considered before management can move forward with the implementation phase of the change process. Organizational leaders and managers will need to monitor and evaluate employees throughout the change process to ensure successful change implementation. Organizational leaders have access to several programs that allow them to analyze the effectiveness of the implemented change. Collecting comparative data will further demonstrate the effectiveness of the implemented change. Comparing data provided before the implemented change and comparing it with new data will demonstrate the effectiveness of the change.

Implementing change in a department of organization can be difficult. Management must have a plan before implementing the change. The manager’s role and responsibility in implementing change within a department is very important. The manager’s role is to assess the change that needs to take place, come up with a plan to implement a change, implement the change, and evaluate the change in a timely order. To have a successful implementation of a new process, the manager must be involved in each step. The manager must keep the staff involved and let the staff know why the change is taking place and how it will affect the work process. The manager faces many challenges such as meeting the organizations goals and working with staff members who

Companies need leaders to effect changes and to improve business performance. Changes are necessary for survival, as competitors might force a company out of business if it chooses to remain