Importance Of Freedom Of Speech

          The bigger issue regarding our right to free speech has to do with censorship and what may potentially become of it. If we continue to strive for a society where we can say whatever we would like, just as long as it doesn't offend anyone, we are losing our rights altogether. Rauch quotes Salman Rushdie in his defense to allegedly offending millions of people, where he asked: “What is freedom of expression? Without the freedom to offend, it ceases to exist”(6). Simply stated, it is nearly impossible to say anything that wouldn't offend someone; Everyone has their own perception of what they consider offensive. Being asked to refrain from using offensive language basically disables you from speaking of anything controversial and therefore we are forced to be idle-minded automatons. Our search for truth and reasoning will be forced to halt as we will no longer be allowed to wonder out loud. If the intellectuals, geniuses, and scientists of our past hadn't been free to ponder the unreasonable, one could assume we wouldn't be where we are today. For no reason should we be forced to silence our thoughts or not speak of anything unacceptable; the result could be far more disastrous than offending people.

Freedom of speech gives people The right to free speech, which is one of the most precious rights an individual has as a citizen of the United States of America. This right gives people the opportunity to speak their mind and give their opinions of what they think should happen. These rights have been questioned and exercised throughout history and have produced extremely positive things in a lot of cases. The questioning of these rights are

The first amendment, the right of freedom of speech is one of the most important classic fantasy to almost anyone living in the United States, building the foundation of our nation. This right gives us plenty of different opportunities to express our opinions and political viewpoints on any issues in America. But it comes with a price, people have been protesting multiple different events trying to prevent people from expressing opposing opinions or political viewpoints on that has issues in America. For the minority of people, expressing a different opinion should be protected no matter how controversial or insensitive it may be.

Free speech is by far the most commonly recognized freedom in our everyday lives. The freedom of speech allows us to voice our own opinions without the severe repercussions of some countries. It allows us to say what we really feel and helps us learn how to communicate in true and meaningful ways. Along with this freedom, we must remember that there are limits to this freedom. While being arrested “you have the right to remain silent” and anything you say can be used against you in court. This freedom is not one to be taken for

"The First Amendment states, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” I am a strong supporter of free speech. Often times I am in complete disagreement with what is being said, but I realize others have just as much right as me to share their thoughts and opinions. If they are stifled, I will be also.

The First Amendment, freedom of speech, has proven to have made a tremendous impact on our history and the course we have taken. Our country has been transformed throughout history to appreciate the different cultures, religions, and traditions; from a simple act as speaking up to what we think is right we have seen our nation grow and prosper. As citizens, we are entitled to express our opinions and this right must be respected. However, we have taken advantage of this amendment. Nowadays, freedom of speech has become more destructive than supportive. Freedom of speech means giving everyone a chance to speak up; this does not give us the right to harm other individuals.

In order to resolve the issues of hate speech, one should address the necessary balance between personal liberties and public safety. However, some restrictions must be placed on hate speech, including the expression of hateful ideas. It is imperative that hate speech is limited in some cases, such as those where it could pose a serious threat to the surrounding environment. The only way hate speech can be controlled is with strict guidelines and probable hate speech situations left up to a case-by-case basis.

Free speech is the backbone that holds democracy together.  Without a free speech, ideas would not be challenged, governments would not be kept in check, and citizens would not be free.  John Stuart Mill said once that, “If all mankind minus one were of one opinion, and only one person were of the contrary opinion, mankind would be no more justified in silencing that one person then he, if he had the power, would be justified in silencing mankind.”( Roleff, 21). The right to free speech is essential to “egalitarian democracy,”(Tsesis) however, this right is not absolute and must be limited in certain situations.

Firstly, I would like to talk about Free Speech Amendment. The bill of Rights States that, “Congress shall make no law… prohibiting the… exercise of… freedom of speech.” Even though this amendment has helped our society nowadays, I feel as if the amendment was made too strict. These amendments protect individuals from having their speech limited by government action, which is intended to stop a government from silencing speech it doesn't like. However, there are some special cases (later discussed in this letter) which make it hard for the government to do their job at times. Due to this, the amendment should have been

In the United States, the First Amendment grants citizens Freedom of Speech. It is one of our most basic rights as human beings which is why the Founding Fathers saw it fit to put it in the very first amendment of the Constitution. However, people often take their rights to the extreme and sometimes even too far. Just because someone has the right to say something, it does not mean they necessarily should. Freely sharing opinions is a good thing, but not if it prevents others from gaining their own personal and true opinion as is

I know free speech is a touchy topic with arguments detailing many issues relating to speech, but, there have been problems with both sides. To my knowledge, free speech is an essential part of most democratic countries, outlining what speech is okay. Freedom of speech being important to the safety of citizens and helping to protect their rights. Although freedom of speech

Firstly, the first amendment is freedom of speech, thought, and religion. The amendment is protected by the constitution for the people. For example, the constitution protects us from the government and how they could try to take advantage of us. Thus having a constitution for our amendments the government set limits on certain amendments such as the first one. Secondly, a person is allowed the, therefore they are technically allowed to say whatever they want. For instance, you can say whatever you please besides "fire" in a crowded area. The reason for that is because somebody could get hurt, and it is unsafe. Thirdly, in any situation a person could get hurt because of your words is a limit on your freedom of speech. To illustrate, Amnesty International an online source stated, every person has the right to seek, receive and impart information and ideas without fear or influence (Amnesty). Hence, not having all the freedom of speech but limited of speech. For all these reasons. There is no need for

Freedom of speech in America is a right the American people are given through the First Amendment in Constitution but finding a balance with that and also protecting others from harassment is very important. Because the Constitution was written way before there was an internet and other technology, the time has come to put in place laws which honor our right to free speech while protecting us from the potential harm from criminal threats, cyber stalking, cyber harassment, sexual invasions of privacy and bias intimidation which is now possible and how it is even

Hatred is blind inveterate anger. There is no intrinsic value in hate speech since it does not lead to the development of society. Victims of hate speech are silenced daily, “intimidated and subject to severe psychological and physical trauma by racist assailants who employ words and symbols as part of oppression and subordination.” The intent of hate speech is never to continue a conversation but to end it. Hate speech is neither mere offense of the other, nor the expression of dissatisfaction with people. Offending one another is the price of free society, but that is not what is in question. According to Mari Matsuda, hate speech is a racist speech that has to with “perpetuation of violence and degradation” of minorities. It is unjustifiable freedom that curbs others liberty by stifling their views. It relies on false facts, ignorance and bigoted ideas. As Matsuda contends, even though hate speech does not curtail all speech, it does “inhibits some expression.” Outside the context of hate speech, we can acknowledge that words are powerful: they have the ability to create both positive and negative psychological effects. For instance, compliments can build confidence, and repeated critiques can break one’s belief in oneself. In the case of hate, speech words can degrade an individual, incite fear and lead to violence. They can traumatize some from

Freedom of speech is unlimited; or is it? You may think that you should be able to say anything you want, using the right of Freedom of Speech. Freedom of speech means you can say whatever you want without holding anything back. Even though the First Amendment to the United States Constitution provides the Freedom of Speech, it also states that ¨Freedom of Speech is not an absolute right; there are many ways in which personal expression can be limited for safety, privacy, and other concerns.¨ Even though people have the right of freedom of speech, they abuse it. There are many types of harmful speech, such as character assassination. My opinion is that freedom of speech should be limited so that people would not get hurt by other people.