Importance Of The Naturalization Civics Test

The first step into becoming a citizen is to determine whether or not are eligible to become a U.S. citizen. You do that by reviewing the naturalization eligibility worksheet. Basically, this work sheet provides you with questions to help you decide if you are eligible to apply for citizenship. According to the worksheet, you must be at least 18 years old, have been living in the united states for at least 3-5 years, have traveled outside of the US for more than a year, stayed in the state that you are applying to be a citizen in for the last 3 months, know basic English, know U.S history and e.t. This is important because it helps you

Over a century ago, the 14th Amendment of the United States Constitution was implemented to grant citizenship to individuals born within the country. This was the first time that it was defined what it means to be a citizen in the U.S. While the amendment was created to address the citizenship of slaves, it is currently under speculation in regards to granting U.S. citizenship to children born to undocumented immigrants (Gans, 2012). While there have been many arguments to place restrictions or eradicate granting children of undocumented immigrants U.S. citizenship, the constitutional right remains the same: if you are born on U.S. land, you are a citizen (Angelo, 2013). This paper argues that the birthright citizenship of U.S. born children of undocumented immigrants should continue to be granted based on the underlying principles of the 14th Amendment and the possible implications of ending birthright citizenship. First, this paper describes birthright citizenship and the 14th Amendment, as well as its use in several Supreme Court cases that are significant to this issue. Then, various implications of eradicating birthright citizenship are discussed. Before discussing the possible consequences of eradicating birthright citizenship, it is imperative to discuss the history and principles underlying it.

Many people have different theories. As mentioned earlier, this clause in the Constitution is to protect the United States from influence from outside countries. What this means is that a group can form a conspiracy in which they plan to become the POTUS (President of the United States) and other major parts in government to keep the conspirators in power. This could lead to tyranny in the nation and utterly destroying what America stands for, Democracy. There are, however, good things that can come out of the removal of the Natural Born Citizen Clause. These foreign leaders could bring in new ideas and philosophies. This would be beneficial, but would you take the risk of being ruled by another country? I don't think you

To be able to understand the controversy surrounding the natural born citizen clause in the constitution, it is important to know why it was added to the constitution in the first place. The original purpose of this clause was to prevent the British rule from coming to America and taking charge (Hulse). The National Constitution Center staff quoted the natural born citizen clause in the constitution saying that “no person except a natural born citizen or a citizen of the United States at the time of the adoption of this constitution shall be eligible to the office of president” (“Natural Born”). This clause also allows children that are offspring of United States citizens that are born internationally to obtain citizenship (“Natural Born”). At the time when the

Constitutional guidelines. The Constitution lists two specific references to immigration and naturalization that the Government May intervein. The government Can protect us from ourselves, and themselves. First, Article I, Section 8 references that creating the authority of Congress, by establishing a uniform Rule of Naturalization or immigration. Secondly, the 14th Amendment states that, all persons born or naturalized in the U.S. are citizens in the State they reside. In the long run, the intent of the founding fathers was whether born a citizen or naturalized

This law made the rules to be followed in order to be granted national citizenship.

Before the United States declared independence from Great Britain on July 4, 1776, any person who traveled to settle in the 13 colonies would not technically be considered an immigrant because the 13 colonies were still under British rule. A majority of these people who made the journey to the New World were British, Irish, Dutch, German, Swedish, and Finnish. According the article “A History of Immigration Reform” by Andrew Soergel, the “Naturalization Act of 1790 that the federal government developed” finally enabled the U.S. to have some sort of organized course of action for naturalization. Under this act, only free and white immigrants were granted citizenship after two years of living in the United States. Due to the Naturalization Act of 1790 having so many restrictions on who is able to become a citizen, other naturalization acts were implicated in the future. During the times of the Civil War (1861-1865) and Reconstruction, immigration

The modern conventional wisdom of the phrase “natural born citizen” in the presidential eligibility clause referred to anyone who was a U.S. citizen at birth either by a U.S. statute or via the Constitution. The Constitution has no “definition” section, and subsequently the Supreme Court has stated that when the Constitution is silent the law “must be interpreted in the light of the common law, the principles and history of which were familiarly known to the framers of the Constitution.” My argument is simple, it is reasonable to assume that the framers, most of whom were well-trained lawyers, purposely did not define the term ‘natural born citizen’ believing that the controlling common law principle was Jus Soli, and that Congress would pass corresponding statutes to accommodate any exceptions to this principle similar to the practice that occurred in England with Parliament.

Civics is the study of of what it means to be an American citizen. Everyone in America

Also in the past citizen of the United States, didn't become "real,natural citizen, until you answered this question: “What is the most important right granted to U.S. citizens?” The correct answer, according to the United States government, is , “The right to vote.” But that “right” has always been on shaky ground. Just as the Constitution once countenanced slavery, it also allowed voting to be restricted to property-holding white men. The Thirteenth Amendment expunged the stain of slavery from our basic law, but the Constitution has never fulfilled the democratic promise we associate with it. In 1868, the 14th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States granted citizenship and equal civil and legal rights to African Americans and

There are various eligibility requirements that they need to pass. They have to be able to understand the basic English language such as read, write, and speak common words and phrases. They also need to know the basic knowledge and understanding of the United States history and government. There are three primary ways to become a United States citizen, if your parents are United States citizens and you were born out of the country, or if they are born in the country, the second way is the “acquisition” of citizenship, the third and last way is

A naturalized citizen is one who, being born an alien, has lawfully become a citizen of the United States under the constitution and laws. They have equal rights to a natural born

In the year of 2015 The United States fell to a devastating natural disaster. Major earthquakes swept from state to state destroying most in its path. After all the earthquakes stopped the remaining people met all together in Washington D.C. They determined that it would take 65 years to fully recover. 20 years to set a foundation necessary to recover for, 30 years to recover half of what was lost, and 15 more years to fully recover. They also determined we lost about 80% of our natural resources so we were way too overpopulated. So we made a naturalization test to determine who stays and who leaves. If we keep all of the people we risk our chances of survival. I know we should keep these people because the test is flawed, They have skills

During the years after the Revolutionary War and the earliest days of the republic there was, on average, 6000 immigrants per year. The earliest versions of Congress didn’t have much power to control immigration as they left that power to state governments. However in 1790 they passed the first Naturalization Act, which stated "…any alien, being a free white person, may be admitted to become a citizen of the United States..." effectively ending any hope at the time for free black people, indentured servants, or Native Americans of becoming citizens. It also provided for citizenship for the children of U.S. citizens born abroad,

Within the article titled “What’s the right way to teach civics” by Vauhini Vara the topic of discussion is how should schools teach civics or should schools teach civics at all. As a future educator, I believe that the knowledge of civics is very important to educate students with. Students are Americans and as teachers it is our job to give students the tools there need in order to become good citizens. In the article the author discussed what the Joe Foss Institute wanted to make a change to. “The Institute decided to try and get states to make laws requiring that, before graduating, students pass a version of the exam given to aspiring citizens before they are naturalized” (Vara, 2015).