Importance Of Violent Video Games

Video games have become a major occupation of majority of the youth these days. They spend hours on end concentrating on video games, some of which are apparently very violent, yet this is actually the whole idea. Coming from the horse's mouth is an argument in support of video games coined from a video programmer's point of view, stating that violent video games allow people to do what they can not do in reality- virtual reality. ( http://www.theroc.org/roc-mag/textarch/roc-15/roc15-08.htm ) For instance, someone said to be having a bad day could use a violent video game to release stress by shooting down a couple hundred bad men than actually taking an AK-47 and spilling down a few brains down the

Since violent video games, like Mortal Kombat, were created, adolescents who play these games become more aggressive than before. To me, playing violent video games is unsafe for these people since they have the negative influence on these people. I believe that researching on that topic would help us get the sense of what problems to avoid. I wish to know what are the possible effects of violent video games on adolescents’ aggression. The independent variable is violent video games, and the dependent variable is adolescents’ aggression. My hypothesis is that adolescents who play violent video games become very aggressive than those who don’t. For this essay, I would like to present the findings from each article that will answer

Are violent video games directly correlated to teen violence? This is the burning question many researchers are dedicated to answering. The common form of the question is “Is the increase in violence in games creating killer kids?” The simple answer is no. Instead the opposite has occurred, as games became more violent, the players became calmer. The games create a “safe” outlet for any anger or angst that young people possess. Crime rates in the teen population have lowered and violent teens admit to having little to no interest in violent video games. The games that most people fear are destroying the youth may actually be one of the things helping them grow and become “normal” members in society.

In the article “Why We Need Violent Video Games” by Ethan Gilsdorf, we are introduced to an all-time controversial topic regarding the influence of violent video games on impactful national shootings in America. In the article, Gilsdorf goes on to support how violent video games help decrease such destructive behaviors and are not primary responsible for such shootings but instead leave such violent tasks as part of our imagination. Although, Gilsdorf holds his own opinion throughout the article, he does not fail to mention the beliefs of certain political leaders about the violent video game industry and the national gun control. Leaders such as Vice President Biden and President Obama were known to try and pass a specific program, proposals

“What happens if an intruder gets in the classroom?” or “ Will I ever be the intruder?” Violent Video games are dangerous to humans in so many ways. One way that Violent Video Games affects humans is how they wash away emotions and sympathy for other people. Even though the shooting and killing is in the video game, they also stimulate a violent behavior and can lead to violence later on. Studies have shown that many shooters (mass or single) or adults who seek violence, have played multiple, or even just one, violent video games. Violent video games affect the left and right side of the brain. Children who play violent video games

The focus of this essay will be on the controversy of violent video games and their effect on youth behaviours. The goal is to examine the two different arguments presented in the case of the video games and compare and contrast them to form a critical analysis. The two views being discussed in regards to violent video games are as follows: authors who have researched and found evidence to support the claim that violence in video games encourages violence in youth. In the opposing side are the authors who have researched and found evidence that opposes the idea of violent video games creating violent youths. The conclusion will focus on analysing the sources used and relating the research back to course material to create a detailed and critical

Video games have become a popular topic of interest to many people,not just the youth community.Video games,especially violent ones,are also a popular way of entertainment to many who enjoy the thrill of being involved in a story or event.Though there may be detrimental details surrounding video games,violent video games are beneficial because video games improve a persons mental release and improve various skills and abilities.

A video game is “an electronic game in which players control images on a television or computer screen” (Merriam-Webster). Video games have been entertaining and challenging gamers since the Game Boy to modern console games. Despite the simplicity of the definition of video games, a video game, especially ones containing violence can have a large effect on the gamer. Because of the realism and advancements in the video game industry, video games can influence the player, and can make the gamer more aggressive, even if the game is not a violent video game. Even though video games have grown in popularity over the past decade, some have not been too popular with parents, for the reason that they are too violent. Violent video games affect

First of all, most teens who love violent games spend most of their time playing video games. In addition, “an even more direct link of video game to real-life violence occurred in 2006. Alabama teen Devin Moore was arrested by local police on suspicion of the car theft. While in custody at the police station , he suddenly attacked an officer, stole his gun, and killed two officers and a 911 dispatcher.” (Ramirez page 14). It feels good

Violent video games have been a popular pass time for American teenagers ever since the first ones were released. The most popular of these games are Grand Theft Auto, Call of Duty, Mortal Kombat, and Doom. It has become a popular belief that these games are directly linked to violent behaviors in our youth. Numerous scholars have set out to determine the validity of these assumptions through vast surveys and studies in America. All of these scholars share the belief that violent video games affect the minds of teenagers in some way, but they do not necessarily agree on whether the effects are constructive or deconstructive in the development of young minds. Russell Laczniak, author of Parental Restrictive Meditation and Children’s

Over 85% of video games contain some type of violence; some video games showing stronger acts than others (Carnagey et al. 1). The exposure to such violent content affects the way humans perform regular actions in their daily life and their perspective on those violent actions. These video games are everywhere, thus being available to anyone who would like to enter a virtual reality where they have control. The more people are exposed to it, the more addicted they become, and the harmful effects become more noticeable. Video games with violent content are harmful to American society because they affect the mental health of the player.

The possible harmful side effects of violent video games has been long debated for many years, especially in light of recent tragedies such as the Columbine shootings which was initially thought to have been caused by excessive violent video game play. Over the years, many professional health associations have joined in agreement of these harmful effects (Anderson, Ihori, Bushman, Rothstein, Shibuya, Swing, Sakamoto & Saleem, 2010). Past research has revealed evidence that violent video games and media violence increases the likelihood of aggressive and violent behavior in both short and long term contexts (Anderson & Dill, 2000). However, because video game violence is a newer phenomenon with this technology emerging in the late 80’s and early 90”s, research is still very limited (Anderson et al., 2010). Nevertheless, Anderson and Dill (2000) produced two quantitative research studies in their published article, “Video Games and Aggressive Thoughts, Feelings, and Behavior in the Laboratory and in Life” using the General Affective Aggressive Model formulation, which revealed a correlation between video game violence and increased aggressive behaviors in both long and short term frameworks.

The arrival of violent video games and the media covering recent mass killings, an emotional debate has developed about the impact of video games on aggressive, violent, and criminal behavior. Findings from certain research are contradictory: some studies show an increase in aggressiveness, while others suggest a decrease in criminality. The increase in the diversity of game platforms makes playing violent video games easier to play, which is a source of concern. Video games are not solidly anchored in the popular culture, while in the past an eccentric pastime no longer exists (Fournis 1). In 1971, the First Amendment was adopted to primarily protect speech critical to the government; in contrast to the English seditious libel laws, which allowed punishment for true speech derogatory. The Supreme Court decided that violent video games cause aggression in children solely based on the First Amendment instead of scientific evidence (Bushman 306). Both sides of violent video games have valid points, but they are missing the one key and most important point, which is the psychology within the household.

Video games are a common way to pass time in a young adult's life. Instead of going outside and playing with friends teens chose to play violent games that can change their behavior. Depression, anger, and mental health problems can be caused from these violent games. Some may argues these games are helpful to a teen's development but in reality they can be deteriorating. Teens should not play violent video games because they make kids aggressive, teaches teens how to use guns, and makes children dull to emotion and reality.

According to the article “Shooting in the Dark” author, Benedict Carey, states that studies today on violent video games show no concrete evidence on actually long term negative effects on gamers. Mr. Carey is not a researcher or scientist but is a veteran writer of neuroscience, neurology, and psychology. Throughout this article he gives factual evidence and quotes from scholarly sources such as doctors and researchers in the fields of behavior and psychology. The author gives ample explanation on evidence used from his sources to give the optimal understanding to the reader of the results and/or findings given by the sources. The article connects to the modern age of gamers with examples from big name video